Moving Eyes: The Aesthetic Effect of Off-Centre Pupils in Portrait Paintings

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
T. Madsen
{"title":"Moving Eyes: The Aesthetic Effect of Off-Centre Pupils in Portrait Paintings","authors":"T. Madsen","doi":"10.1080/20539320.2019.1587966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Most eighteenth- and nineteenth-century portrait paintings have eyes staring outward at the beholder. A minority of these eyes have slightly elevated pupils in comparison to the iris. These off-centre pupils are not the norm, but they occur regularly in works by skilful European portrait painters in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This article takes a closer look at selected portrait paintings by Danish artists Jens Juel and Constantin Hansen and argues that the discrepancy between the pupils and the rest of the paintings creates an illusion of movement or presence when looking the paintings in the eye. The discrepancy creates an aesthetic effect corresponding with Merleau-Ponty’s concept of internal discordance. According to Merleau-Ponty, visual art can create the illusion of movement by portraying its parts in different moments. These internal discordances make the painting “move” because the beholder unconsciously creates a fictive link between the parts thereby expanding time in space. The article combines presence theory (Jean-Luc Nancy and Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht), phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty) and art theory and perception theory (James Elkins, Dominic McIver Lopes and Michael Fried) in order to study the effects and possible reasons for creating pupils out of sync with the rest of the painting.","PeriodicalId":41067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology","volume":"6 1","pages":"59 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20539320.2019.1587966","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2019.1587966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most eighteenth- and nineteenth-century portrait paintings have eyes staring outward at the beholder. A minority of these eyes have slightly elevated pupils in comparison to the iris. These off-centre pupils are not the norm, but they occur regularly in works by skilful European portrait painters in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This article takes a closer look at selected portrait paintings by Danish artists Jens Juel and Constantin Hansen and argues that the discrepancy between the pupils and the rest of the paintings creates an illusion of movement or presence when looking the paintings in the eye. The discrepancy creates an aesthetic effect corresponding with Merleau-Ponty’s concept of internal discordance. According to Merleau-Ponty, visual art can create the illusion of movement by portraying its parts in different moments. These internal discordances make the painting “move” because the beholder unconsciously creates a fictive link between the parts thereby expanding time in space. The article combines presence theory (Jean-Luc Nancy and Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht), phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty) and art theory and perception theory (James Elkins, Dominic McIver Lopes and Michael Fried) in order to study the effects and possible reasons for creating pupils out of sync with the rest of the painting.
动眼:偏离中心的小学生在肖像画中的审美效果
大多数十八和十九世纪的肖像画都有眼睛向外盯着观看者。与虹膜相比,这些眼睛中的少数瞳孔略高。这些偏离中心的瞳孔并不常见,但它们经常出现在18、19世纪娴熟的欧洲肖像画家的作品中。这篇文章仔细研究了丹麦艺术家延斯·朱尔和康斯坦丁·汉森所选的肖像画,并认为瞳孔和画作其他部分之间的差异在观看画作时产生了一种运动或存在的错觉。这种差异创造了一种符合梅洛-庞蒂内在不和谐概念的美学效果。根据梅洛-庞蒂的观点,视觉艺术可以通过描绘不同时刻的角色来创造运动的幻觉。这些内部的不协调使画作“移动”,因为观者无意识地在各个部分之间创造了一种虚构的联系,从而扩大了空间中的时间。本文结合存在理论(jean - luc南希和Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht),现象学(梅洛庞蒂)和艺术理论和认知理论(James Elkins多米尼克McIver洛佩斯和迈克尔油炸)为了研究的影响和可能的原因造成学生不同步与其他绘画。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信