Cognitive and linguistic dysfunction after thalamic stroke and recovery process: possible mechanism

IF 3.1 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
S. Obayashi
{"title":"Cognitive and linguistic dysfunction after thalamic stroke and recovery process: possible mechanism","authors":"S. Obayashi","doi":"10.3934/Neuroscience.2022001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thalamic stroke may result in cognitive and linguistic problems, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Especially, it is still a matter of debate why thalamic aphasia occasionally occurs and then mostly recovers to some degree. We begin with a brief overview of the cognitive dysfunction and aphasia, and then review previous hypotheses of the underlying mechanism. We introduced a unique characteristic of relatively transient “word retrieval difficulty” of patients in acute phase of thalamic stroke. Word retrieval ability involves both executive function and speech production. Furthermore, SMA aphasia and thalamic aphasia may resemble in terms of the rapid recovery, thus suggesting a shared neural system. This ability is attributable to the supplementary motor area (SMA) and inferior frontal cortex (IFG) via the frontal aslant tract (FAT). To explore the possible mechanism, we applied unique hybrid neuroimaging techniques: single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (f-NIRS). SPECT can visualize the brain distribution associated with word retrieval difficulty, cognitive disability or aphasia after thalamic stroke, and f-NIRS focuses on SMA and monitors long-term changes in hemodynamic SMA responses during phonemic verbal task. SPECT yielded common perfusion abnormalities not only in the fronto–parieto–cerebellar–thalamic loop, but also in bilateral brain regions such as SMA, IFG and language-relevant regions. f-NIRS demonstrated that thalamic stroke developed significant word retrieval decline, which was intimately linked to posterior SMA responses. Word retrieval difficulty was rapidly recovered with increased bilateral SMA responses at follow-up NIRS. Together, we propose that the cognitive domain affected by thalamic stroke may be related to the fronto–parieto–cerebellar–thalamic loop, while the linguistic region may be attributable to SMA, IFG and language-related brain areas. Especially, bilateral SMA may play a crucial role in the recovery of word retrieval, and right language-related region, including IFG, angular gyrus and supramarginal gyrus may determine recovery from thalamic aphasia.","PeriodicalId":7732,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Neuroscience","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2022001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Thalamic stroke may result in cognitive and linguistic problems, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Especially, it is still a matter of debate why thalamic aphasia occasionally occurs and then mostly recovers to some degree. We begin with a brief overview of the cognitive dysfunction and aphasia, and then review previous hypotheses of the underlying mechanism. We introduced a unique characteristic of relatively transient “word retrieval difficulty” of patients in acute phase of thalamic stroke. Word retrieval ability involves both executive function and speech production. Furthermore, SMA aphasia and thalamic aphasia may resemble in terms of the rapid recovery, thus suggesting a shared neural system. This ability is attributable to the supplementary motor area (SMA) and inferior frontal cortex (IFG) via the frontal aslant tract (FAT). To explore the possible mechanism, we applied unique hybrid neuroimaging techniques: single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (f-NIRS). SPECT can visualize the brain distribution associated with word retrieval difficulty, cognitive disability or aphasia after thalamic stroke, and f-NIRS focuses on SMA and monitors long-term changes in hemodynamic SMA responses during phonemic verbal task. SPECT yielded common perfusion abnormalities not only in the fronto–parieto–cerebellar–thalamic loop, but also in bilateral brain regions such as SMA, IFG and language-relevant regions. f-NIRS demonstrated that thalamic stroke developed significant word retrieval decline, which was intimately linked to posterior SMA responses. Word retrieval difficulty was rapidly recovered with increased bilateral SMA responses at follow-up NIRS. Together, we propose that the cognitive domain affected by thalamic stroke may be related to the fronto–parieto–cerebellar–thalamic loop, while the linguistic region may be attributable to SMA, IFG and language-related brain areas. Especially, bilateral SMA may play a crucial role in the recovery of word retrieval, and right language-related region, including IFG, angular gyrus and supramarginal gyrus may determine recovery from thalamic aphasia.
脑卒中后认知和语言功能障碍及其恢复过程:可能的机制
丘脑中风可能导致认知和语言问题,但其潜在机制尚不清楚。特别是,为什么丘脑失语症偶尔发生,然后大部分在某种程度上恢复,这仍然是一个争论的问题。我们首先简要概述了认知功能障碍和失语症,然后回顾了以前的假设的潜在机制。我们介绍了丘脑卒中急性期患者相对短暂的“单词检索困难”的独特特征。词语检索能力包括执行功能和言语生成。此外,SMA失语症和丘脑失语症在快速恢复方面可能相似,从而表明它们具有共同的神经系统。这种能力可归因于补充运动区(SMA)和下额皮质(IFG)通过额斜束(FAT)。为了探索可能的机制,我们应用了独特的混合神经成像技术:单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和功能近红外光谱(f-NIRS)。SPECT可以可视化丘脑卒中后与单词检索困难、认知障碍或失语症相关的大脑分布,而f-NIRS则专注于SMA并监测语音任务中SMA血流动力学反应的长期变化。SPECT不仅在额顶小脑丘脑回路中发现了常见的灌注异常,而且在双侧大脑区域如SMA、IFG和语言相关区域也发现了灌注异常。f-NIRS显示丘脑卒中出现了显著的单词检索下降,这与后侧SMA反应密切相关。在后续的近红外光谱中,单词检索困难随着双侧SMA反应的增加而迅速恢复。综上所述,我们提出丘脑中风影响的认知区域可能与额顶-小脑-丘脑回路有关,而语言区域可能与SMA、IFG和语言相关脑区有关。特别是,双侧SMA可能在单词检索的恢复中起关键作用,而包括IFG、角回和边缘上回在内的右侧语言相关区域可能决定丘脑失语症的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Neuroscience
AIMS Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: AIMS Neuroscience is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers from all areas in the field of neuroscience. The primary focus is to provide a forum in which to expedite the speed with which theoretical neuroscience progresses toward generating testable hypotheses. In the presence of current and developing technology that offers unprecedented access to functions of the nervous system at all levels, the journal is designed to serve the role of providing the widest variety of the best theoretical views leading to suggested studies. Single blind peer review is provided for all articles and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信