Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Catheterization: Perioperative Outcomes After Colpocleisis

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
A. DiCarlo-Meacham, K. Dengler, E. Welch, S. Hamade, C. Olsen, N. Horbach, J. Welgoss, D. Mazloomdoost, W. V. von Pechmann
{"title":"Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Catheterization: Perioperative Outcomes After Colpocleisis","authors":"A. DiCarlo-Meacham, K. Dengler, E. Welch, S. Hamade, C. Olsen, N. Horbach, J. Welgoss, D. Mazloomdoost, W. V. von Pechmann","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Transient postoperative urinary retention occurs in approximately half of women after colpocleisis; however, the optimal strategy for postoperative catheter management is unclear. This study compared length of catheterization and postoperative complications after colpocleisis between planned suprapubic catheter placement and transurethral catheterization. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study including all women undergoing colpocleisis from January 2015 to December 2019 in a large female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice. Women undergoing planned placement of a suprapubic catheter intraoperatively during colpocleisis and women who were discharged with a transurethral catheter after failing an active voiding trial postoperatively after colpocleisis were included. Women with surgical complications requiring prolonged catheterization and those needing catheterization before surgery were excluded. Length of catheterization and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Results Two hundred fifty-eight women underwent colpocleisis during the study time frame and 170 were eligible for analysis: with 78 in the planned suprapubic catheter group and 92 in the transurethral catheter group. Length of catheterization with suprapubic catheter placement was significantly longer than transurethral catheter placement with median catheter days of 11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10–14) versus 7 (95% CI, 6–7), which persisted after adjustment (HR, 2.61, 95% CI, 1.85–3.68, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in overall complications or urinary tract infections. Conclusions Suprapubic catheter placement at the time of colpocleisis is associated with increased length of catheterization postoperatively compared with transurethral catheter for management of postoperative urinary retention. These data can aid surgeons in preoperative counseling and shared decision making with patients.","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"149 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives Transient postoperative urinary retention occurs in approximately half of women after colpocleisis; however, the optimal strategy for postoperative catheter management is unclear. This study compared length of catheterization and postoperative complications after colpocleisis between planned suprapubic catheter placement and transurethral catheterization. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study including all women undergoing colpocleisis from January 2015 to December 2019 in a large female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice. Women undergoing planned placement of a suprapubic catheter intraoperatively during colpocleisis and women who were discharged with a transurethral catheter after failing an active voiding trial postoperatively after colpocleisis were included. Women with surgical complications requiring prolonged catheterization and those needing catheterization before surgery were excluded. Length of catheterization and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Results Two hundred fifty-eight women underwent colpocleisis during the study time frame and 170 were eligible for analysis: with 78 in the planned suprapubic catheter group and 92 in the transurethral catheter group. Length of catheterization with suprapubic catheter placement was significantly longer than transurethral catheter placement with median catheter days of 11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10–14) versus 7 (95% CI, 6–7), which persisted after adjustment (HR, 2.61, 95% CI, 1.85–3.68, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in overall complications or urinary tract infections. Conclusions Suprapubic catheter placement at the time of colpocleisis is associated with increased length of catheterization postoperatively compared with transurethral catheter for management of postoperative urinary retention. These data can aid surgeons in preoperative counseling and shared decision making with patients.
耻骨上置管与经尿道置管:阴道破裂后围手术期结果
目的:阴道炎后约有一半的女性发生短暂性术后尿潴留;然而,术后导管管理的最佳策略尚不清楚。本研究比较了经尿道置管和经耻骨上置管两种方法在阴道炎后的置管长度和术后并发症。方法回顾性队列研究,纳入2015年1月至2019年12月在大型女性盆腔医学和重建手术实践中接受阴道阴道炎的所有女性。其中包括阴道破裂术中计划放置耻骨上导管的妇女,以及阴道破裂术后主动排尿试验失败后使用经尿道导管出院的妇女。有手术并发症需要长时间置管的妇女和术前需要置管的妇女被排除在外。比较两组间置管长度及术后并发症。结果258名女性在研究期间发生阴道阴道炎,其中170名符合分析条件:计划耻骨上导管组78名,经尿道导管组92名。耻骨上置管的置管长度明显长于经尿道置管,置管时间中位数为11天(95%可信区间[CI], 10-14),而经尿道置管时间中位数为7天(95% CI, 6-7),调整后仍持续存在(HR, 2.61, 95% CI, 1.85-3.68, P < 0.001)。在总体并发症或尿路感染方面没有发现显著差异。结论与经尿道导尿管相比,阴道炎时放置耻骨上导尿管可增加术后尿潴留的导尿管长度。这些数据可以帮助外科医生进行术前咨询并与患者共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信