On the Over-Prediction of Centrifugal Compressor Pressure Ratio in the High Impeller Tip Mach Number Regime

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Bing Qiao, Xiao He, M. Vahdati, Y. Ju, Chuhua Zhang
{"title":"On the Over-Prediction of Centrifugal Compressor Pressure Ratio in the High Impeller Tip Mach Number Regime","authors":"Bing Qiao, Xiao He, M. Vahdati, Y. Ju, Chuhua Zhang","doi":"10.1115/1.4063099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is a routinely used tool for turbomachinery research and development, but it often over-predicts the pressure ratio of centrifugal compressors especially in the high impeller tip Mach number regime. In this paper, the effects of a series of geometrical and numerical uncertainties and errors on the aerodynamic performance of a centrifugal compressor are investigated systematically. The investigated compressor is the NASA CC3 centrifugal compressor under different impeller tip Mach number conditions. The investigated geometrical/numerical factors include the impeller blade fillet, the impeller hub cavity, the impeller running tip clearance, the averaging method in the post-process, the turbulence model, the inlet duct hub rotation, and the inlet turbulence boundary condition. Results show that the uncertainty of the predicted total pressure ratio generally increases with the impeller tip Mach number, and an analytical explanation of such a trend is provided. Among the investigated factors, the averaging method, the impeller blade fillet, the turbulence model and the impeller hub cavity have the most pronounced effects in determining the compressor total pressure ratio. By adopting realistic geometric features, advanced turbulence modeling treatments, and the same averaging method as the experiment, the over-prediction in the total pressure ratio can be alleviated. Detailed flow mechanism analysis with respect to the impeller hub cavity and the turbulence model has been performed. These findings provide valuable guidance for future RANS simulations of centrifugal compressors.","PeriodicalId":49966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turbomachinery-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turbomachinery-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation is a routinely used tool for turbomachinery research and development, but it often over-predicts the pressure ratio of centrifugal compressors especially in the high impeller tip Mach number regime. In this paper, the effects of a series of geometrical and numerical uncertainties and errors on the aerodynamic performance of a centrifugal compressor are investigated systematically. The investigated compressor is the NASA CC3 centrifugal compressor under different impeller tip Mach number conditions. The investigated geometrical/numerical factors include the impeller blade fillet, the impeller hub cavity, the impeller running tip clearance, the averaging method in the post-process, the turbulence model, the inlet duct hub rotation, and the inlet turbulence boundary condition. Results show that the uncertainty of the predicted total pressure ratio generally increases with the impeller tip Mach number, and an analytical explanation of such a trend is provided. Among the investigated factors, the averaging method, the impeller blade fillet, the turbulence model and the impeller hub cavity have the most pronounced effects in determining the compressor total pressure ratio. By adopting realistic geometric features, advanced turbulence modeling treatments, and the same averaging method as the experiment, the over-prediction in the total pressure ratio can be alleviated. Detailed flow mechanism analysis with respect to the impeller hub cavity and the turbulence model has been performed. These findings provide valuable guidance for future RANS simulations of centrifugal compressors.
高叶尖马赫数状态下离心压缩机压比的过度预测
Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS)模拟是涡轮机械研究和开发的常用工具,但它经常高估离心压缩机的压力比,尤其是在高叶尖马赫数状态下。本文系统地研究了一系列几何和数值不确定性和误差对离心式压缩机气动性能的影响。所研究的压缩机是NASA CC3离心式压缩机,在不同的叶尖马赫数条件下。所研究的几何/数值因素包括叶轮叶片圆角、叶轮轮毂腔、叶轮运行叶尖间隙、后处理中的平均方法、湍流模型、进气管轮毂旋转和进气湍流边界条件。结果表明,预测总压比的不确定性通常随着叶轮叶尖马赫数的增加而增加,并对这种趋势进行了分析解释。在所研究的因素中,平均法、叶轮叶片圆角、湍流模型和轮毂腔对确定压缩机总压比的影响最为显著。通过采用逼真的几何特征、先进的湍流建模处理以及与实验相同的平均方法,可以缓解总压比的过度预测。对叶轮轮毂腔和湍流模型进行了详细的流动机理分析。这些发现为未来离心式压缩机的RANS模拟提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
168
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Turbomachinery publishes archival-quality, peer-reviewed technical papers that advance the state-of-the-art of turbomachinery technology related to gas turbine engines. The broad scope of the subject matter includes the fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and aeromechanics technology associated with the design, analysis, modeling, testing, and performance of turbomachinery. Emphasis is placed on gas-path technologies associated with axial compressors, centrifugal compressors, and turbines. Topics: Aerodynamic design, analysis, and test of compressor and turbine blading; Compressor stall, surge, and operability issues; Heat transfer phenomena and film cooling design, analysis, and testing in turbines; Aeromechanical instabilities; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applied to turbomachinery, boundary layer development, measurement techniques, and cavity and leaking flows.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信