Perspectives of Teachers at Medical Colleges Across India regarding the Competency based Medical Education Curriculum – A Qualitative, Manual, Theoretical Thematic Content Analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jeevithan Shanmugam, Rashmi Ramanathan, Mohan Kumar, Sridhar M Gopalakrishna, Kalanithi T Palanisamy, Seetharaman Narayanan
{"title":"Perspectives of Teachers at Medical Colleges Across India regarding the Competency based Medical Education Curriculum – A Qualitative, Manual, Theoretical Thematic Content Analysis","authors":"Jeevithan Shanmugam, Rashmi Ramanathan, Mohan Kumar, Sridhar M Gopalakrishna, Kalanithi T Palanisamy, Seetharaman Narayanan","doi":"10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum has been implemented in India since 2019 with a goal to create an “Indian Medical Graduate” (IMG) possessing requisite knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, and responsiveness. Objectives: To explore teachers’ perceptions across India at medical colleges on the newly implemented competency-based medical education curriculum.\nMethods: This was a qualitative cross?sectional study conducted among teachers working at medical colleges across India, between February and April 2022 (n = 192). The data collection was done using Google forms online survey platform on teachers’ perception regarding CBME, its specific components, and perceived bottlenecks. We analyzed this qualitative data using manual, theoretical thematic content analysis following the steps endorsed in Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework.\nResults: The majority of the teachers (64.1%) have positively responded to the CBME curriculum’s implementation. However, it came with a caution that the curriculum should continuously evolve and adapt to regional demands. The foundation course, early clinical exposure, and the family adoption program were the specific components of CBME curriculum over which the teachers raised concerns. The need for additional teachers in each department (department-specific teacher or faculty per hundred students ratio to be worked out) and the need for enabling faculty preparedness through adequate training was highlighted. Concerns were also raised regarding implementing CBME with teachers without a medical background (especially in preclinical departments). Conclusion: It is the need of the hour for the curriculum to incorporate a systematic feedback mechanism built into the system, though which such critical appraisals can be meaning collated and acted upon, to ultimately evolve, thereby creating an “Indian Medical Graduate” for the needs of todays’ society.","PeriodicalId":13363,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum has been implemented in India since 2019 with a goal to create an “Indian Medical Graduate” (IMG) possessing requisite knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, and responsiveness. Objectives: To explore teachers’ perceptions across India at medical colleges on the newly implemented competency-based medical education curriculum. Methods: This was a qualitative cross?sectional study conducted among teachers working at medical colleges across India, between February and April 2022 (n = 192). The data collection was done using Google forms online survey platform on teachers’ perception regarding CBME, its specific components, and perceived bottlenecks. We analyzed this qualitative data using manual, theoretical thematic content analysis following the steps endorsed in Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework. Results: The majority of the teachers (64.1%) have positively responded to the CBME curriculum’s implementation. However, it came with a caution that the curriculum should continuously evolve and adapt to regional demands. The foundation course, early clinical exposure, and the family adoption program were the specific components of CBME curriculum over which the teachers raised concerns. The need for additional teachers in each department (department-specific teacher or faculty per hundred students ratio to be worked out) and the need for enabling faculty preparedness through adequate training was highlighted. Concerns were also raised regarding implementing CBME with teachers without a medical background (especially in preclinical departments). Conclusion: It is the need of the hour for the curriculum to incorporate a systematic feedback mechanism built into the system, though which such critical appraisals can be meaning collated and acted upon, to ultimately evolve, thereby creating an “Indian Medical Graduate” for the needs of todays’ society.
印度医学院教师对基于能力的医学教育课程的看法——定性、手册、理论主题内容分析
背景:自2019年以来,印度实施了以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)课程,目标是培养具备必要知识、技能、态度、价值观和反应能力的“印度医学毕业生”(IMG)。目的:探讨印度医学院教师对新实施的以能力为基础的医学教育课程的看法。方法:进行定性杂交。在2022年2月至4月期间,对在印度医学院工作的教师进行了一项分段研究(n = 192)。使用谷歌表格在线调查平台,收集教师对CBME的感知、具体组成部分和感知瓶颈的数据。我们按照Braun和Clarke的六阶段框架所认可的步骤,使用手动的、理论的主题内容分析来分析这些定性数据。结果:绝大多数教师(64.1%)对CBME课程的实施持积极态度。然而,它也提出了一个警告,即课程应该不断发展并适应地区需求。基础课程、早期临床接触和家庭收养计划是CBME课程中教师关注的具体内容。会议强调,需要在每个系增加教师(每个系的教师或教员每百名学生的比例有待制订),需要通过充分的培训使教员作好准备。对没有医学背景的教师(特别是在临床前科室)实施CBME也提出了关切。结论:课程需要时间将系统的反馈机制整合到系统中,尽管这些关键的评估可以进行意义整理和采取行动,最终发展,从而创造出符合当今社会需求的“印度医学毕业生”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Community Health
Indian Journal of Community Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信