Application of vacuum membrane distillation process for lithium recovery in spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recycling process

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Taekgeun Yun , Junghyun Kim , Seockheon Lee , Seungkwan Hong
{"title":"Application of vacuum membrane distillation process for lithium recovery in spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recycling process","authors":"Taekgeun Yun ,&nbsp;Junghyun Kim ,&nbsp;Seockheon Lee ,&nbsp;Seungkwan Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.desal.2023.116874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The feasibility of using vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) for lithium recovery by concentrating the discharged leachate from </span>spent lithium ion batteries<span><span> (LIBs) recycling process was evaluated. The performance of VMD was compared with that of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) in terms of </span>water flux<span>, concentration rate, membrane wetting, and economic feasibility. VMD achieved a higher volume concentration factor (VCF) of 45 compared to the VCF of 25 achieved by DCMD in the LiCl feed solution. In the Li</span></span></span><sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub><span><span> feed solution, VMD and DCMD were concentrated to VCF15 and VCF 17, respectively, before wetting occurred. The stability of the MD process was verified using feed solutions containing nickel and manganese, which are cathode materials that can cause scaling even at low concentrations. Low concentrations of nickel and manganese did not significantly affect the maximum VCF or wetting; however, high concentrations of nickel and manganese affected the stability of the MD process. VMD exhibited a higher flux and 32 % lower </span>thermal energy consumption than DCMD. Furthermore, the expected cost of Li</span><sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub><span><span> production with VMD for leachate concentration was $8.31–10.65/kg. The VMD </span>concentration process is a feasible option for recovering lithium from the discharged leachate from spent LIBs recycling process.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":299,"journal":{"name":"Desalination","volume":"565 ","pages":"Article 116874"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desalination","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916423005064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The feasibility of using vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) for lithium recovery by concentrating the discharged leachate from spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recycling process was evaluated. The performance of VMD was compared with that of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) in terms of water flux, concentration rate, membrane wetting, and economic feasibility. VMD achieved a higher volume concentration factor (VCF) of 45 compared to the VCF of 25 achieved by DCMD in the LiCl feed solution. In the Li2SO4 feed solution, VMD and DCMD were concentrated to VCF15 and VCF 17, respectively, before wetting occurred. The stability of the MD process was verified using feed solutions containing nickel and manganese, which are cathode materials that can cause scaling even at low concentrations. Low concentrations of nickel and manganese did not significantly affect the maximum VCF or wetting; however, high concentrations of nickel and manganese affected the stability of the MD process. VMD exhibited a higher flux and 32 % lower thermal energy consumption than DCMD. Furthermore, the expected cost of Li2CO3 production with VMD for leachate concentration was $8.31–10.65/kg. The VMD concentration process is a feasible option for recovering lithium from the discharged leachate from spent LIBs recycling process.

Abstract Image

真空膜蒸馏法回收锂在废旧锂离子电池回收过程中的应用
对利用真空膜蒸馏(VMD)对废旧锂离子电池(LIBs)回收过程中排放的渗滤液进行浓缩回收锂的可行性进行了评价。从水通量、浓度速率、膜润湿性和经济可行性等方面比较了VMD与直接接触膜蒸馏(DCMD)的性能。VMD的体积浓度因子(VCF)为45,而DCMD在LiCl进料溶液中的VCF为25。在Li2SO4进料溶液中,VMD和DCMD分别浓缩到VCF15和vcf17,然后进行润湿。使用含有镍和锰的进料溶液验证了MD工艺的稳定性,镍和锰是阴极材料,即使在低浓度下也会引起结垢。低浓度的镍和锰对最大VCF和润湿没有显著影响;然而,高浓度的镍和锰影响了MD过程的稳定性。VMD比DCMD具有更高的通量和低32%的热能消耗。此外,对渗滤液浓度进行VMD生产Li2CO3的预期成本为8.31-10.65美元/公斤。从废锂回收过程中排放的渗滤液中回收VMD浓缩工艺是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Desalination
Desalination 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
20.20%
发文量
619
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Desalination is a scholarly journal that focuses on the field of desalination materials, processes, and associated technologies. It encompasses a wide range of disciplines and aims to publish exceptional papers in this area. The journal invites submissions that explicitly revolve around water desalting and its applications to various sources such as seawater, groundwater, and wastewater. It particularly encourages research on diverse desalination methods including thermal, membrane, sorption, and hybrid processes. By providing a platform for innovative studies, Desalination aims to advance the understanding and development of desalination technologies, promoting sustainable solutions for water scarcity challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信