Monetary trilemma, dilemma, or something in between?

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ruijie Cheng, Ramkishen S. Rajan
{"title":"Monetary trilemma, dilemma, or something in between?","authors":"Ruijie Cheng,&nbsp;Ramkishen S. Rajan","doi":"10.1111/infi.12363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper revisits the monetary “trilemma” versus “dilemma” debate by examining empirically interest-rate policy independence for a large sample of both advanced and developing countries over the period 1973–2014. We broadly concur with the growing body of literature that suggests that the trilemma still holds, emphasizing the important insulating effects afforded by exchange-rate flexibility. However, as with Han and Wei (2018), we also document the existence of an asymmetric pattern or 2.5-lemma between the trilemma and dilemma; though, in contrast to them, we find there seems to be evidence of a “fear of capital reversal” rather than a “fear of appreciation.” We further find that holding higher levels of foreign reserves may help countries regain a degree of monetary-policy autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46336,"journal":{"name":"International Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/infi.12363","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infi.12363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper revisits the monetary “trilemma” versus “dilemma” debate by examining empirically interest-rate policy independence for a large sample of both advanced and developing countries over the period 1973–2014. We broadly concur with the growing body of literature that suggests that the trilemma still holds, emphasizing the important insulating effects afforded by exchange-rate flexibility. However, as with Han and Wei (2018), we also document the existence of an asymmetric pattern or 2.5-lemma between the trilemma and dilemma; though, in contrast to them, we find there seems to be evidence of a “fear of capital reversal” rather than a “fear of appreciation.” We further find that holding higher levels of foreign reserves may help countries regain a degree of monetary-policy autonomy.

货币三难,两难,还是介于两者之间?
本文通过实证研究1973-2014年期间发达国家和发展中国家的大量样本利率政策独立性,重新审视了货币“三难困境”与“困境”的争论。我们广泛同意越来越多的文献表明三难困境仍然存在,强调汇率灵活性提供的重要隔离效应。然而,与Han和Wei(2018)一样,我们也记录了三难困境和困境之间存在不对称模式或2.5引理;然而,与他们相反,我们发现似乎有证据表明“对资本逆转的恐惧”而不是“对升值的恐惧”。我们进一步发现,持有较高水平的外汇储备可能有助于各国重新获得一定程度的货币政策自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Finance is a highly selective ISI-accredited journal featuring literate and policy-relevant analysis in macroeconomics and finance. Specific areas of focus include: · Exchange rates · Monetary policy · Political economy · Financial markets · Corporate finance The journal''s readership extends well beyond academia into national treasuries and corporate treasuries, central banks and investment banks, and major international organizations. International Finance publishes lucid, policy-relevant writing in macroeconomics and finance backed by rigorous theory and empirical analysis. In addition to the core double-refereed articles, the journal publishes non-refereed themed book reviews by invited authors and commentary pieces by major policy figures. The editor delivers the vast majority of first-round decisions within three months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信