Risk factors for penile prosthesis infection: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2023.2242204
Konstantin Menshchikov, Mikhail Menshchikov, Dmitry Yurasov, Anton Artamonov
{"title":"Risk factors for penile prosthesis infection: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Konstantin Menshchikov, Mikhail Menshchikov, Dmitry Yurasov, Anton Artamonov","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2023.2242204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As available data on implantation-related infections is contradictory, the aim was to identify the predictors of penile prosthesis infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an umbrella review and meta-analysis including systematic reviews with extractable data. Literature search was done in two databases: PubMed and Google Scholar. The participants were males with erectile dysfunction regardless of etiology who underwent penile implant surgery. Using a standardized form, three trained researchers reviewed each reference (systematic review) by title and abstract. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (RevMan® 5.4.1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 systematic reviews were identified with the search strategies. Of these, 35 duplicates were removed. Thirty-seven full-text reviews were then excluded after revision. Six systematic reviews with a total of 271,226 patients (156,553 patients in the study group and 114,673 patients in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis identified various predictors of adverse outcomes (infection). Among them were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and different characteristics of penile implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed significant risk factors/predictors of penile prosthesis infection: glycated hemoglobin levels; reoperation, and two predictors associated with the type of penile prosthesis. The weighted mean HbA1c levels of patients with and without infections were 8.37% and 7.17% respectively. The OR was as follows: first surgery/revision OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.29-0.45); antibiotic-coated/non-coated prosthesis OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.72); malleable/inflatable prosthesis OR 3.51 (95% CI 1.41-8.74).</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2023.2242204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As available data on implantation-related infections is contradictory, the aim was to identify the predictors of penile prosthesis infection.

Methods: We performed an umbrella review and meta-analysis including systematic reviews with extractable data. Literature search was done in two databases: PubMed and Google Scholar. The participants were males with erectile dysfunction regardless of etiology who underwent penile implant surgery. Using a standardized form, three trained researchers reviewed each reference (systematic review) by title and abstract. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (RevMan® 5.4.1).

Results: A total of 78 systematic reviews were identified with the search strategies. Of these, 35 duplicates were removed. Thirty-seven full-text reviews were then excluded after revision. Six systematic reviews with a total of 271,226 patients (156,553 patients in the study group and 114,673 patients in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis identified various predictors of adverse outcomes (infection). Among them were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and different characteristics of penile implants.

Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed significant risk factors/predictors of penile prosthesis infection: glycated hemoglobin levels; reoperation, and two predictors associated with the type of penile prosthesis. The weighted mean HbA1c levels of patients with and without infections were 8.37% and 7.17% respectively. The OR was as follows: first surgery/revision OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.29-0.45); antibiotic-coated/non-coated prosthesis OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.72); malleable/inflatable prosthesis OR 3.51 (95% CI 1.41-8.74).

阴茎假体感染的危险因素:综述和荟萃分析
背景:关于植入相关感染的现有数据相互矛盾,因此我们的目的是确定阴茎假体感染的预测因素:我们进行了总括性综述和荟萃分析,包括可提取数据的系统性综述。我们在两个数据库中进行了文献检索:PubMed和谷歌学术。参与者为接受阴茎植入手术的勃起功能障碍男性,病因不限。三名训练有素的研究人员使用标准表格对每篇参考文献(系统综述)的标题和摘要进行了审查。使用Review Manager 5.4.1 (RevMan® 5.4.1)进行荟萃分析:结果:通过检索策略共发现 78 篇系统综述。其中删除了 35 篇重复内容。经修订后,37 篇全文综述被排除在外。荟萃分析纳入了六篇系统综述,共计 271,226 名患者(研究组 156,553 名患者,对照组 114,673 名患者)。分析确定了不良结果(感染)的各种预测因素。其中包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和阴茎植入物的不同特征:系统综述和荟萃分析揭示了阴茎假体感染的重要风险因素/预测因子:糖化血红蛋白水平、再次手术以及与阴茎假体类型相关的两个预测因子。感染和未感染患者的加权平均 HbA1c 水平分别为 8.37% 和 7.17%。OR值如下:首次手术/再次手术OR值为0.36(95% CI为0.29-0.45);抗生素涂层/无涂层假体OR值为0.47(95% CI为0.31-0.72);可弯曲/可充气假体OR值为3.51(95% CI为1.41-8.74)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信