Estimating the likelihood of ESBL-producing E. coli carriage in slaughter-aged pigs following bacterial introduction onto a farm: A multiscale risk assessment

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Catherine McCarthy , Alexis Viel , Chris Gavin , Pascal Sanders , Robin R.L. Simons
{"title":"Estimating the likelihood of ESBL-producing E. coli carriage in slaughter-aged pigs following bacterial introduction onto a farm: A multiscale risk assessment","authors":"Catherine McCarthy ,&nbsp;Alexis Viel ,&nbsp;Chris Gavin ,&nbsp;Pascal Sanders ,&nbsp;Robin R.L. Simons","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2021.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) between animals, their environment, food and humans is a complex issue. Previous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models indicate that extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) resistant bacterial populations may be self-sustaining through horizontal and vertical gene transfer, even in the absence of antimicrobial pressure. However, models focusing purely on the biochemical aspects fail to incorporate the complicated host population dynamics which occur within a farm environment. Models of disease transmission within commercial farm environments can provide further insight to the on-farm transmission dynamics of AMR between animals and their environment, as well as predict the effect of various on-farm interventions. Here, we present a risk assessment which predicts the likelihood that slaughter-aged pigs would carry resistant bacteria after a single introduction of ESBL <em>E. coli</em> on commercial pig farms. We incorporate outputs from a PKPD model which explores the complex host/gastrointestinal bacteria interplay after antimicrobial treatment; with an on-farm model of bacterial transmission. The risk assessment is designed to be adaptable for the simultaneous transmission of multiple bacteria and resistant strains. We predicted that after introduction onto a pig farm, ESBL <em>E. coli</em> bacteria are likely to persist on the farm for more than a year, leading to a high batch prevalence (39.4% slaughter pigs, 5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–57.5) and high faecal shedding. A comparison of different farm management types suggested that all-in-all-out housing was a protective measure for both prevalence in slaughter-aged pigs and faecal shedding rates. We applied two main interventions at the farm level, an enhanced cleaning and disinfectant (C&amp;D) protocol and isolation of pigs in sick pens for the duration of their antibiotic treatment. Both interventions were able to reduce the number of pigs shedding more than 2 log<sub>10</sub> ESBL <em>E. coli</em> from 18.7% (5th and 95th percentiles: 5.9–30.4) in the baseline scenario, to 7.2% (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–21.5) when an enhanced C&amp;D protocol was applied, 0.1% (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–0.3) when sick pens were used and 0.1% (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–0.3) when a combination of enhanced C&amp;D plus sick pens was used. Both scenarios also reduced the prevalence in batches of pigs going to slaughter. This effect was largest when sick pens were used, where 75% of batches had 0% positive pigs. The results suggest that a single introductory event is sufficient to cause a substantial risk of carriage in slaughter-aged pigs. Further quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA) are needed to consider the onwards risk posed to later parts of the food chain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235235222100027X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) between animals, their environment, food and humans is a complex issue. Previous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models indicate that extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) resistant bacterial populations may be self-sustaining through horizontal and vertical gene transfer, even in the absence of antimicrobial pressure. However, models focusing purely on the biochemical aspects fail to incorporate the complicated host population dynamics which occur within a farm environment. Models of disease transmission within commercial farm environments can provide further insight to the on-farm transmission dynamics of AMR between animals and their environment, as well as predict the effect of various on-farm interventions. Here, we present a risk assessment which predicts the likelihood that slaughter-aged pigs would carry resistant bacteria after a single introduction of ESBL E. coli on commercial pig farms. We incorporate outputs from a PKPD model which explores the complex host/gastrointestinal bacteria interplay after antimicrobial treatment; with an on-farm model of bacterial transmission. The risk assessment is designed to be adaptable for the simultaneous transmission of multiple bacteria and resistant strains. We predicted that after introduction onto a pig farm, ESBL E. coli bacteria are likely to persist on the farm for more than a year, leading to a high batch prevalence (39.4% slaughter pigs, 5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–57.5) and high faecal shedding. A comparison of different farm management types suggested that all-in-all-out housing was a protective measure for both prevalence in slaughter-aged pigs and faecal shedding rates. We applied two main interventions at the farm level, an enhanced cleaning and disinfectant (C&D) protocol and isolation of pigs in sick pens for the duration of their antibiotic treatment. Both interventions were able to reduce the number of pigs shedding more than 2 log10 ESBL E. coli from 18.7% (5th and 95th percentiles: 5.9–30.4) in the baseline scenario, to 7.2% (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–21.5) when an enhanced C&D protocol was applied, 0.1% (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–0.3) when sick pens were used and 0.1% (5th and 95th percentiles: 0.0–0.3) when a combination of enhanced C&D plus sick pens was used. Both scenarios also reduced the prevalence in batches of pigs going to slaughter. This effect was largest when sick pens were used, where 75% of batches had 0% positive pigs. The results suggest that a single introductory event is sufficient to cause a substantial risk of carriage in slaughter-aged pigs. Further quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA) are needed to consider the onwards risk posed to later parts of the food chain.

在农场引入细菌后,估计屠宰年龄猪携带产生esbl的大肠杆菌的可能性:多尺度风险评估
抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)在动物及其环境、食物和人类之间的传播是一个复杂的问题。先前的药代动力学-药效学(PKPD)模型表明,即使在没有抗菌素压力的情况下,广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)耐药细菌群体也可能通过水平和垂直基因转移自我维持。然而,单纯关注生物化学方面的模型未能纳入在农场环境中发生的复杂宿主种群动态。商业农场环境中的疾病传播模型可以进一步了解动物及其环境之间的AMR在农场中的传播动态,并预测各种农场干预措施的效果。在这里,我们提出了一项风险评估,预测了在商业养猪场引入单一ESBL大肠杆菌后,屠宰年龄的猪携带耐药细菌的可能性。我们纳入了PKPD模型的输出,该模型探索了抗菌治疗后复杂的宿主/胃肠道细菌相互作用;用农场内的细菌传播模型。风险评估的设计适用于多种细菌和耐药菌株的同时传播。我们预测,ESBL大肠杆菌引入猪场后,可能会在猪场持续存在一年以上,导致高批次流行率(屠宰猪39.4%,第5和第95百分位数:0.0-57.5)和高粪便排出率。对不同农场管理类型的比较表明,全面的住房是一种保护措施,既保护了屠宰年龄猪的患病率,也保护了粪便排出率。我们在猪场一级采用了两项主要干预措施,即加强清洁和消毒(C&D)方案,以及在猪的抗生素治疗期间对病猪圈中的猪进行隔离。两种干预措施都能够将猪的ESBL大肠杆菌数量从基线情景下的18.7%(第5和第95百分位数:5.9-30.4)减少到7.2%(第5和第95百分位数:0.0-21.5),当使用病栏时减少0.1%(第5和第95百分位数:0.0-0.3),当使用强化的C&D +病栏组合使用时减少0.1%(第5和第95百分位数:0.0-0.3)。这两种情况也降低了即将屠宰的猪的流行率。当使用病栏时,这种影响最大,其中75%的批次有0%的阳性猪。结果表明,单一的介绍性事件足以造成屠宰年龄猪携带的重大风险。需要进一步的定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)来考虑对食物链后期部分构成的后续风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信