What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Agnieszka Pytlowana, B. Kroese
{"title":"What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography","authors":"Agnieszka Pytlowana, B. Kroese","doi":"10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIt has been recommended that social, health and other relevant professionals work collaboratively to support parents with learning disabilities (LD) and their children. A number of qualitative studies have investigated the experiences of professionals who work with parents with LD. A synthesis of these experiences has not as yet been produced, and therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review how professionals experience working with parents with LD to inform practice guidelines on how parents with LD can be supported most effectively.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic search took place using five databases and 15 peer-reviewed papers were identified based on the relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each included paper was systematically evaluated. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the qualitative data from the identified studies.\n\n\nFindings\nThe synthesis offered six themes: concerns about knowledge and experience, the importance of and difficulties with available support, the importance of and challenges with liaison with and between professionals, differences in power, conflicting priorities – parents or children?, the personal impact on professionals.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results are discussed in the context of previous research. Recommendations for future research and practice innovation are made.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose It has been recommended that social, health and other relevant professionals work collaboratively to support parents with learning disabilities (LD) and their children. A number of qualitative studies have investigated the experiences of professionals who work with parents with LD. A synthesis of these experiences has not as yet been produced, and therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review how professionals experience working with parents with LD to inform practice guidelines on how parents with LD can be supported most effectively. Design/methodology/approach A systematic search took place using five databases and 15 peer-reviewed papers were identified based on the relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each included paper was systematically evaluated. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the qualitative data from the identified studies. Findings The synthesis offered six themes: concerns about knowledge and experience, the importance of and difficulties with available support, the importance of and challenges with liaison with and between professionals, differences in power, conflicting priorities – parents or children?, the personal impact on professionals. Originality/value The results are discussed in the context of previous research. Recommendations for future research and practice innovation are made.
专业人士在帮助有学习障碍的父母方面有什么经验?一个meta-ethnography
目的建议社会、卫生和其他相关专业人员合作,支持有学习障碍(LD)的父母及其子女。许多定性研究调查了与患有LD的父母一起工作的专业人员的经历。这些经验的综合还没有形成,因此,本文的目的是回顾专业人员如何与患有LD的父母合作,为如何最有效地支持患有LD的家长提供实践指南。设计/方法/方法使用五个数据库进行了系统搜索,并根据相关的纳入和排除标准确定了15篇同行评审论文。对每一篇论文的质量进行了系统评估。元民族志用于综合已确定研究的定性数据。发现该综合报告提供了六个主题:对知识和经验的关注,现有支持的重要性和困难,与专业人员联系的重要性和挑战,权力差异,相互冲突的优先事项——父母还是孩子?,对专业人士的个人影响。原创性/价值这些结果是在先前研究的背景下讨论的。对未来的研究和实践创新提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信