Book Review: Hillary Angelo, How Green Became Good: Urbanized Nature and the Making of Cities and Citizens

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Kevin Loughran
{"title":"Book Review: Hillary Angelo, How Green Became Good: Urbanized Nature and the Making of Cities and Citizens","authors":"Kevin Loughran","doi":"10.1177/15356841221076662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"jeopardizing tax revenue, in general Airbnb avoids giving cities “the data they need to easily and efficiently monitor and enforce regulations or study impact” (p. 47). The second half of the book, which is focused on Australia and Germany, notes that Airbnb was “well-received in Australia where it encountered little resistance from housing advocates and local authorities,” soon making it “the most penetrated market in the world” (p. 81). However, as elsewhere, concerns about “quality of life and neighborhood amenities” (p. 88) soon fueled efforts to research the impact of Airbnb, although “regulation has been mild, primarily taking the form of codes of conduct” (p. 97). By comparison, in Germany, one of the “least penetrated markets” (p. 104), Airbnb and related short-term rentals (STRs) have been “met with a degree of skepticism and resistance” (p. 105). As Hoffman and Heisler note, “in a nation of renters facing a severe housing crisis, Airbnb and STRs have been perceived as extremely threatening because ‘every unit counts’” (p. 126). Looking at the United States, Germany, and Australia, the authors find similar patterns with listings concentrated in “inner-city, trendy and gentrifying neighborhoods” where their concentration leads to “rising rents, house prices and lack of availability” and the conversion to “tourist milieus” displaces locals. Not surprisingly, most cities discussed in the book have a problem with commercial hosts, Airbnb’s so-called “bad actors” who overwhelmingly secure the most rental nights, make the most money from the platform, and never seem to be in short supply, regardless of platform efforts. One can’t help but think that if all the barrels have bad apples, maybe it’s an issue with the orchard . . . Unlike many books on the gig economy, this is decidedly not a trade book. While the authors refer to “narratives,” this is less of a human interest story of what happens to neighbors when Airbnb comes to town and more of a sobering accounting of the reports written by each side. Although the book is an invaluable reference guide to the sheer magnitude of studies conducted to examine the impact of Airbnb and short-term rentals on the local housing market in the case study cities, I was disappointed that there wasn’t more on the actual impact on the ground. Learning that rents are up by a certain percentage in desirable communities is important, but what does that change actually mean for the residents? While unfortunately outside the scope of this book, it would also be fascinating to see the impact of the coronavirus pandemic—and related decrease in tourism—on Airbnb. Did hosts move their rental properties from shortterm back to long-term, enabling a re-seeding of neighborhoods with long-term residents? Or will eviction moratoriums eventually push more landlords into the short-term rental market in order to make up for earlier income shortfalls? With references listed after every chapter, I had great hopes that this could be used in an undergraduate special topics class on the sharing economy. While the writing is clear, and the chapters are manageable, the book would likely be a better fit in a graduate seminar in urban studies or urban planning or an advanced undergraduate seminar focused on cross-cultural perspectives on the sharing economy. In addition, organizations or researchers who plan to field their own studies on the impact of short-term rentals locally would likely find this to be a useful resource, especially when seeking to compare their results with those of other locales.","PeriodicalId":47486,"journal":{"name":"City & Community","volume":"21 1","pages":"83 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City & Community","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841221076662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

jeopardizing tax revenue, in general Airbnb avoids giving cities “the data they need to easily and efficiently monitor and enforce regulations or study impact” (p. 47). The second half of the book, which is focused on Australia and Germany, notes that Airbnb was “well-received in Australia where it encountered little resistance from housing advocates and local authorities,” soon making it “the most penetrated market in the world” (p. 81). However, as elsewhere, concerns about “quality of life and neighborhood amenities” (p. 88) soon fueled efforts to research the impact of Airbnb, although “regulation has been mild, primarily taking the form of codes of conduct” (p. 97). By comparison, in Germany, one of the “least penetrated markets” (p. 104), Airbnb and related short-term rentals (STRs) have been “met with a degree of skepticism and resistance” (p. 105). As Hoffman and Heisler note, “in a nation of renters facing a severe housing crisis, Airbnb and STRs have been perceived as extremely threatening because ‘every unit counts’” (p. 126). Looking at the United States, Germany, and Australia, the authors find similar patterns with listings concentrated in “inner-city, trendy and gentrifying neighborhoods” where their concentration leads to “rising rents, house prices and lack of availability” and the conversion to “tourist milieus” displaces locals. Not surprisingly, most cities discussed in the book have a problem with commercial hosts, Airbnb’s so-called “bad actors” who overwhelmingly secure the most rental nights, make the most money from the platform, and never seem to be in short supply, regardless of platform efforts. One can’t help but think that if all the barrels have bad apples, maybe it’s an issue with the orchard . . . Unlike many books on the gig economy, this is decidedly not a trade book. While the authors refer to “narratives,” this is less of a human interest story of what happens to neighbors when Airbnb comes to town and more of a sobering accounting of the reports written by each side. Although the book is an invaluable reference guide to the sheer magnitude of studies conducted to examine the impact of Airbnb and short-term rentals on the local housing market in the case study cities, I was disappointed that there wasn’t more on the actual impact on the ground. Learning that rents are up by a certain percentage in desirable communities is important, but what does that change actually mean for the residents? While unfortunately outside the scope of this book, it would also be fascinating to see the impact of the coronavirus pandemic—and related decrease in tourism—on Airbnb. Did hosts move their rental properties from shortterm back to long-term, enabling a re-seeding of neighborhoods with long-term residents? Or will eviction moratoriums eventually push more landlords into the short-term rental market in order to make up for earlier income shortfalls? With references listed after every chapter, I had great hopes that this could be used in an undergraduate special topics class on the sharing economy. While the writing is clear, and the chapters are manageable, the book would likely be a better fit in a graduate seminar in urban studies or urban planning or an advanced undergraduate seminar focused on cross-cultural perspectives on the sharing economy. In addition, organizations or researchers who plan to field their own studies on the impact of short-term rentals locally would likely find this to be a useful resource, especially when seeking to compare their results with those of other locales.
书评:希拉里·安吉洛,《绿色如何变得美好:城市化的自然与城市和公民的形成》
一般来说,Airbnb避免向城市提供“他们需要的数据,以便轻松有效地监控和执行法规或研究影响”(第47页)。该书的后半部分主要关注澳大利亚和德国,指出Airbnb“在澳大利亚很受欢迎,几乎没有遇到住房倡导者和地方当局的阻力”,很快使其成为“世界上渗透程度最高的市场”(第81页)。然而,和其他地方一样,对“生活质量和社区便利设施”的担忧(第88页)很快推动了对Airbnb影响的研究,尽管“监管一直很温和,主要采取行为准则的形式”(第97页)。相比之下,在“渗透最少的市场”之一的德国(第104页),Airbnb和相关的短期租赁(str)“遭到了一定程度的怀疑和抵制”(第105页)。正如霍夫曼和海斯勒所指出的,“在一个租房者面临严重住房危机的国家,Airbnb和STRs被认为是极具威胁性的,因为‘每个单元都很重要’”(第126页)。在美国、德国和澳大利亚,作者发现了类似的模式,房源集中在“内城、时尚和中产阶级化的社区”,这些社区的集中导致“租金上涨、房价上涨和房源缺乏”,而向“旅游环境”的转变取代了当地人。不出所料,书中讨论的大多数城市都存在商业房东的问题,即Airbnb所谓的“坏演员”,他们绝大多数都能保证最多的出租夜,从平台上赚到最多的钱,而且无论平台如何努力,似乎从来都不会出现供不应求的情况。人们不禁会想,如果所有的桶里都有坏苹果,也许这是果园的问题……与许多关于零工经济的书不同,这本书显然不是一本行业书籍。虽然作者提到了“叙事”,但这并不是一个人性化的故事,讲述了当Airbnb来到小镇时,邻居们会发生什么,而更多的是对双方撰写的报告进行了发人深省的描述。尽管这本书是一本非常有价值的参考指南,说明了在案例研究城市中,为检验Airbnb和短期租赁对当地房地产市场的影响而进行的大量研究,但令我失望的是,书中没有更多关于实际影响的内容。了解到理想社区的租金上涨了一定比例是很重要的,但这种变化对居民来说究竟意味着什么?虽然不幸的是,这超出了本书的范围,但看到冠状病毒大流行以及相关的旅游业减少对Airbnb的影响也很有趣。房东是否将他们的租赁房产从短期转为长期,从而重新播种长期居民的社区?或者,为了弥补之前的收入不足,暂缓驱逐最终会不会迫使更多的房东进入短期租赁市场?每一章后面都列出了参考文献,我非常希望这本书能被用在关于共享经济的本科专题课上。虽然写作清晰,章节易于管理,但这本书可能更适合城市研究或城市规划的研究生研讨会,或者以共享经济的跨文化视角为重点的高级本科生研讨会。此外,计划对当地短期租赁的影响进行实地研究的组织或研究人员可能会发现这是一个有用的资源,特别是在寻求将其结果与其他地区的结果进行比较时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City & Community
City & Community Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信