Diagnostic value of PCT level detection combined with bacterial culture in lower respiratory tract infection

Z. Hui, Li Jiameng
{"title":"Diagnostic value of PCT level detection combined with bacterial culture in lower respiratory tract infection","authors":"Z. Hui, Li Jiameng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-1245.2019.23.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) level detection combined with bacterial culture in lower respiratory tract infection. \n \n \nMethods \n88 patients with lower respiratory tract infection admitted to our hospital from March, 2017 to June, 2019 were selected as the research objects. According to the clinical diagnosis, they were divided into a bacterial infection group (44 cases) and a non-bacterial infection group (44 cases). 44 healthy people who underwent physical examination in our hospital at the same time were selected as a control group. The three groups were detected by electrochemical sandwich method. The sputum of the bacterial infection group was collected for bacterial culture. The PCT levels and positive rates of the three groups were compared; and the distribution of bacteria and the detection rate of bacterial culture in the bacterial culture group were counted. \n \n \nResults \nThe PCT level of the bacterial infection group was higher than those of the non-bacterial infection group and the control group, with statistical differences (both P<0.05); the PCT level of the non-bacterial infection group was higher than that of control group, with a statistical difference (P<0.05). The positive rate of the bacterial infection group was higher than those of the non-bacterial infection group and the control group, with statistical differences (both P<0.05); the positive rate of the non-bacterial infection group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The results of bacterial culture showed that 22 cases were positive, and the detection rate was 50.00%, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa accounting for 36.36%, Staphylococcus epidermidis 18.18%, Staphylococcus aureus 13.63%, Klebsiella pneumoniae 18.18%, pneumonia 18.18%, Streptococcus 4.55%, Escherichia coli 4.55%, and Enterobacter cloacae 4.55%. \n \n \nConclusion \nPCT level detection combined with bacterial culture can improve the positive detection rate of lower respiratory tract infection, and provide important guidance for clinical identification of bacterial infection, non-bacterial infection, and clinical medication. \n \n \nKey words: \nLower respiratory tract infection; PCT level detection; Bacterial culture","PeriodicalId":14405,"journal":{"name":"国际医药卫生导报","volume":"25 1","pages":"3917-3919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际医药卫生导报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-1245.2019.23.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) level detection combined with bacterial culture in lower respiratory tract infection. Methods 88 patients with lower respiratory tract infection admitted to our hospital from March, 2017 to June, 2019 were selected as the research objects. According to the clinical diagnosis, they were divided into a bacterial infection group (44 cases) and a non-bacterial infection group (44 cases). 44 healthy people who underwent physical examination in our hospital at the same time were selected as a control group. The three groups were detected by electrochemical sandwich method. The sputum of the bacterial infection group was collected for bacterial culture. The PCT levels and positive rates of the three groups were compared; and the distribution of bacteria and the detection rate of bacterial culture in the bacterial culture group were counted. Results The PCT level of the bacterial infection group was higher than those of the non-bacterial infection group and the control group, with statistical differences (both P<0.05); the PCT level of the non-bacterial infection group was higher than that of control group, with a statistical difference (P<0.05). The positive rate of the bacterial infection group was higher than those of the non-bacterial infection group and the control group, with statistical differences (both P<0.05); the positive rate of the non-bacterial infection group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The results of bacterial culture showed that 22 cases were positive, and the detection rate was 50.00%, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa accounting for 36.36%, Staphylococcus epidermidis 18.18%, Staphylococcus aureus 13.63%, Klebsiella pneumoniae 18.18%, pneumonia 18.18%, Streptococcus 4.55%, Escherichia coli 4.55%, and Enterobacter cloacae 4.55%. Conclusion PCT level detection combined with bacterial culture can improve the positive detection rate of lower respiratory tract infection, and provide important guidance for clinical identification of bacterial infection, non-bacterial infection, and clinical medication. Key words: Lower respiratory tract infection; PCT level detection; Bacterial culture
PCT水平检测联合细菌培养对下呼吸道感染的诊断价值
目的探讨降钙素原(PCT)检测联合细菌培养对下呼吸道感染的诊断价值。方法选取2017年3月至2019年6月我院收治的88例下呼吸道感染患者为研究对象。根据临床诊断分为细菌感染组(44例)和非细菌感染组(44例)。选取同期在我院体检的健康人群44人作为对照组。采用电化学夹芯法对三种基团进行检测。收集细菌感染组痰液进行细菌培养。比较三组患者PCT水平及阳性率;统计细菌培养组细菌分布及细菌培养检出率。结果细菌感染组PCT水平高于非细菌感染组和对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);非细菌感染组PCT水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。细菌感染组的阳性率高于非细菌感染组和对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);非细菌感染组的阳性率高于对照组(P<0.05)。细菌培养结果为阳性22例,检出率为50.00%,其中铜绿假单胞菌占36.36%,表皮葡萄球菌占18.18%,金黄色葡萄球菌占13.63%,肺炎克雷伯菌占18.18%,肺炎占18.18%,链球菌占4.55%,大肠杆菌占4.55%,阴沟肠杆菌占4.55%。结论PCT水平检测联合细菌培养可提高下呼吸道感染的阳性检出率,为临床鉴别细菌感染、非细菌感染及临床用药提供重要指导。关键词:下呼吸道感染;PCT水平检测;细菌培养
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26723
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信