Peasants’ Informal Employment: A Microsocietal Study of Two Villages of Dingxian, Hebei (华北农民非正规就业的微观形态: 基于河北定县两个村庄的考察)

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Jialiang Huang, Yongsheng Wang
{"title":"Peasants’ Informal Employment: A Microsocietal Study of Two Villages of Dingxian, Hebei (华北农民非正规就业的微观形态: 基于河北定县两个村庄的考察)","authors":"Jialiang Huang, Yongsheng Wang","doi":"10.1163/22136746-01401006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on informal employment in China has mainly adopted an urban perspective, ignoring its rural social and economic dimensions. This article, adopting a rural perspective, not only takes into considerations a greater number of informal forms of employment, such as part-time businesses and self-employment, but also explores the mechanisms that differentiate the various types of informal employment by comparing the level of development of township and village enterprises and changes in the mode of agricultural management. The article discusses the forms and evolution of informal employment in two villages in Dingxian (Ting Hsien) 定县, a county that has been studied in depth since the 1920s. Our study finds that the distance between township enterprises and the village is an important factor influencing peasants’ informal employment since it largely determines the choice of peasants to “leave both the land and the village” or to “leave the land but not the village,” which in turn further affects the level of peasants’ incomes. Compared with employees in the formal sector, these informal employees are obviously in a weak position in terms of wage levels, working conditions, welfare, security, and so on. As for the internal environment, changes of the mode of rural production also affect the forms of informal employment. The large-scale operation of the land will liberate the agricultural labor force, so as to expand the potential scale of farmers’ employment, and the shift from growing food crops to growing cash crops will lead to more diversified forms of farmers’ concurrent businesses. Finally, the article tries to establish a framework composed of the internal and external environment of the village to explain the mechanism of peasants’ informal employment.国内关于非正规就业的研究,大多是以城市为观察视角,忽视了非正规就业人员身后的农村社会经济状况。把农村作为研究的起点,不仅可以纳入更多的非正规就业形式,如农民兼业和个体经营等,更为重要的是,它还能够通过对比“传统部门”内不同程度的乡镇企业发展与农业经营方式变化,从而发现非正规就业的差异化形成机制。作为上世纪20年代就已备受学界关注的农村社会,河北定县有着深厚的学术研究传统。本研究选取了当地两个具有不同特征的村庄,发现附近是否存在乡镇企业很大程度上决定了农民打工的距离远近,即离乡还是不离乡,这也进一步影响农民收入水平的高低。无论是以建筑业为主的离乡务工,还是以作坊式乡镇企业为主的在乡务工,其员工的工资水平、工作条件和福利保障等方面均处于不利位置。与此同时,农村内部经营方式变化也会影响、甚至促成新的非正规就业。土地规模经营更大程度上解放了农业劳动力,客观上扩大了农民外出的潜在规模;从种植粮食作物到经济作物的转变,使得农民兼业形式变得更加多样化。最后,我们尝试建立一个由村庄内外部环境共同作用形成的经验框架来解释农村非正规就业的变化机制。 (This article is in English.)","PeriodicalId":37171,"journal":{"name":"Rural China","volume":"14 1","pages":"101-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-01401006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research on informal employment in China has mainly adopted an urban perspective, ignoring its rural social and economic dimensions. This article, adopting a rural perspective, not only takes into considerations a greater number of informal forms of employment, such as part-time businesses and self-employment, but also explores the mechanisms that differentiate the various types of informal employment by comparing the level of development of township and village enterprises and changes in the mode of agricultural management. The article discusses the forms and evolution of informal employment in two villages in Dingxian (Ting Hsien) 定县, a county that has been studied in depth since the 1920s. Our study finds that the distance between township enterprises and the village is an important factor influencing peasants’ informal employment since it largely determines the choice of peasants to “leave both the land and the village” or to “leave the land but not the village,” which in turn further affects the level of peasants’ incomes. Compared with employees in the formal sector, these informal employees are obviously in a weak position in terms of wage levels, working conditions, welfare, security, and so on. As for the internal environment, changes of the mode of rural production also affect the forms of informal employment. The large-scale operation of the land will liberate the agricultural labor force, so as to expand the potential scale of farmers’ employment, and the shift from growing food crops to growing cash crops will lead to more diversified forms of farmers’ concurrent businesses. Finally, the article tries to establish a framework composed of the internal and external environment of the village to explain the mechanism of peasants’ informal employment.国内关于非正规就业的研究,大多是以城市为观察视角,忽视了非正规就业人员身后的农村社会经济状况。把农村作为研究的起点,不仅可以纳入更多的非正规就业形式,如农民兼业和个体经营等,更为重要的是,它还能够通过对比“传统部门”内不同程度的乡镇企业发展与农业经营方式变化,从而发现非正规就业的差异化形成机制。作为上世纪20年代就已备受学界关注的农村社会,河北定县有着深厚的学术研究传统。本研究选取了当地两个具有不同特征的村庄,发现附近是否存在乡镇企业很大程度上决定了农民打工的距离远近,即离乡还是不离乡,这也进一步影响农民收入水平的高低。无论是以建筑业为主的离乡务工,还是以作坊式乡镇企业为主的在乡务工,其员工的工资水平、工作条件和福利保障等方面均处于不利位置。与此同时,农村内部经营方式变化也会影响、甚至促成新的非正规就业。土地规模经营更大程度上解放了农业劳动力,客观上扩大了农民外出的潜在规模;从种植粮食作物到经济作物的转变,使得农民兼业形式变得更加多样化。最后,我们尝试建立一个由村庄内外部环境共同作用形成的经验框架来解释农村非正规就业的变化机制。 (This article is in English.)
Peasants’ Informal Employment: A Microsocietal Study of Two Villages of Dingxian, Hebei (华北农民非正规就业的微观形态: 基于河北定县两个村庄的考察)
中国的非正式就业研究主要采用城市视角,忽视了其农村社会经济维度。本文采用农村视角,不仅考虑到更多的非正式就业形式,如兼职经营和自营职业,而且通过比较乡镇企业的发展水平和农业经营模式的变化,探讨了不同类型非正式就业的区分机制。本文讨论了自20世纪20年代以来一直被深入研究的定县(亭县)的两个村庄的非正式就业的形式和演变。研究发现,乡镇企业与乡镇之间的距离是影响农民非正式就业的重要因素,它在很大程度上决定了农民是“离开土地和村庄”还是“离开土地而不离开村庄”的选择,进而影响农民的收入水平。与正规部门的雇员相比,这些非正规雇员在工资水平、工作条件、福利、保障等方面明显处于弱势地位。就内部环境而言,农村生产方式的变化也影响着非正规就业的形式。土地的规模化经营将解放农业劳动力,从而扩大农民的潜在就业规模,从种植粮食作物向种植经济作物的转变将使农民的兼业形式更加多样化。最后,本文试图建立一个由村庄内外部环境构成的框架来解释农民的非正式就业机制。把农村作为研究的起点,不仅可以纳入更多的非正规就业形式,如农民兼业和个体经营等,更为重要的是,它还能够通过对比“传统部门”内不同程度的乡镇企业发展与农业经营方式变化,从而发现非正规就业的差异化形成机制。作为上世纪20年代就已备受学界关注的农村社会,河北定县有着深厚的学术研究传统。本研究选取了当地两个具有不同特征的村庄,发现附近是否存在乡镇企业很大程度上决定了农民打工的距离远近,即离乡还是不离乡,这也进一步影响农民收入水平的高低。无论是以建筑业为主的离乡务工,还是以作坊式乡镇企业为主的在乡务工,其员工的工资水平、工作条件和福利保障等方面均处于不利位置。与此同时,农村内部经营方式变化也会影响、甚至促成新的非正规就业。土地规模经营更大程度上解放了农业劳动力,客观上扩大了农民外出的潜在规模;从种植粮食作物到经济作物的转变,使得农民兼业形式变得更加多样化。最后,我们尝试建立一个由村庄内外部环境共同作用形成的经验框架来解释农村非正规就业的变化机制。 (这篇文章是英文的。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural China
Rural China Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信