The function of the monarchy as an institution in British society, for the Commonwealth, and globally

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
O. Khaleelee
{"title":"The function of the monarchy as an institution in British society, for the Commonwealth, and globally","authors":"O. Khaleelee","doi":"10.33212/osd.v22n2.2022.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixteen months before the death of our Queen, OPUS held a Study Day with thirty participants on the function of the monarchy in British society, the Commonwealth, and globally. Perceptions of the monarchy clustered into either very positive perceptions or equally negative views. The positive perception was especially of the Queen in her role; the equally negative view was either in the perception of the \"scaffolding\" around the monarchy, her court, or in how the class structure with its negative consequences for society emanates from the existence of the monarchy. Another negative perception of the monarchy was as a colonising power whose actions often had destructive consequences for many different nations. In between, we had two sets of feelings: on the one hand, feelings of shame about past and present behaviours, particularly as a coloniser; and on the other hand, a powerful dependency on the monarchy, certainly amongst those English people present, and focused on the person of the Queen. Related to this was anxiety about the succession to the throne, about monarchical competence, and about whether the monarchy could provide containment of the Union, or whether the UK will break up into its constituent parts.","PeriodicalId":41413,"journal":{"name":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/osd.v22n2.2022.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sixteen months before the death of our Queen, OPUS held a Study Day with thirty participants on the function of the monarchy in British society, the Commonwealth, and globally. Perceptions of the monarchy clustered into either very positive perceptions or equally negative views. The positive perception was especially of the Queen in her role; the equally negative view was either in the perception of the "scaffolding" around the monarchy, her court, or in how the class structure with its negative consequences for society emanates from the existence of the monarchy. Another negative perception of the monarchy was as a colonising power whose actions often had destructive consequences for many different nations. In between, we had two sets of feelings: on the one hand, feelings of shame about past and present behaviours, particularly as a coloniser; and on the other hand, a powerful dependency on the monarchy, certainly amongst those English people present, and focused on the person of the Queen. Related to this was anxiety about the succession to the throne, about monarchical competence, and about whether the monarchy could provide containment of the Union, or whether the UK will break up into its constituent parts.
君主制作为一种制度在英国社会、英联邦和全球的作用
在女王去世的16个月前,安大略省公共事务部举办了一个有30名参与者参加的研究日,主题是君主制在英国社会、英联邦和全球的作用。对君主制的看法要么是非常积极的看法,要么是同样消极的看法。人们对女王的积极看法尤其突出;同样负面的观点要么是对君主制、她的宫廷周围的“脚手架”的看法,要么是对阶级结构及其对社会的负面影响如何源于君主制的存在。对君主制的另一种负面看法是,它是一个殖民大国,其行为往往对许多不同的国家产生破坏性后果。在这两者之间,我们有两种感觉:一方面,对过去和现在的行为感到羞耻,尤其是作为一名殖民者;另一方面,对君主制的强烈依赖,当然在在场的英国人中也是如此,他们关注的是女王本人。与此相关的是对王位继承、君主制能力以及君主制是否能遏制联邦的焦虑,或者英国是否会分裂成其组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Organisational and Social Dynamics
Organisational and Social Dynamics PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: O&SD aims to create a deeper understanding of organisational and social processes and their effects on individuals, and to provide a forum for both theoretical and applied papers addressing emerging issues in societies and organisations from a psycho-social perspective. The editors seek to sustain a creative tension between scientific rigour and popular appeal, by developing conversations with the professional and social scientific worlds and opening them to practitioners and reflective citizens everywhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信