Sharon Lee. An Unseen Unheard Minority: Asian American Students at the University of Illinois New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2021. 172 pp.

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christopher Getowicz
{"title":"Sharon Lee. An Unseen Unheard Minority: Asian American Students at the University of Illinois New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2021. 172 pp.","authors":"Christopher Getowicz","doi":"10.1017/heq.2022.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"researched, Burkholder seems to have left few stones unturned. Sources include newspapers, research studies, court cases, the NAACP papers, school board records, and a plethora of secondary sources. She manages the varying viewpoints of white conservatives, moderates, and liberals as well as Black nationalists, integrationists, moderates, civil rights leaders, and Black power advocates. Burkholder also simplifies a complex history with excellent writing, representative vignettes, and amplified voices of scholars, leaders, teachers, parents, and students. Inevitably, even the most comprehensive studies may fail to feature every example or city. Burkholder deftly chooses representative samples to demonstrate both support for and opposition to integration. Such an approach can also lead to some viewpoints receiving minimal coverage. It would have been useful to see more coverage of Black nationalism in the earlier eras as well as more Black views of community control. Finally, perhaps the study should have ended prior to the contemporary period, because the examples beyond 2007 are limited. These are all minor points of preference rather than critiques. So much of the history of northern Black education is only found in case studies or limited to certain eras. This study is timely, extensive, and a major contribution to the history of African American education. More significantly, it reminds us that both strategies of integration and separation were thoughtful responses in the various historical contexts. Certainly, Black people should be integrated into the larger society to fulfill their roles as citizens, claim the luxuries of freedom, and avoid underfunded and inequitable education. They should also be free to value an education in Black-controlled spaces where students can be nurtured and cultivated to their highest potential, as Vanessa Siddle Walker has argued. Throughout the back-and-forth between these strategies, white supremacy has truncated both responses. The value of these continued debates is evidence that Black people are unwilling to sit back and allow white supremacy to continue unabated.","PeriodicalId":45631,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2022.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

researched, Burkholder seems to have left few stones unturned. Sources include newspapers, research studies, court cases, the NAACP papers, school board records, and a plethora of secondary sources. She manages the varying viewpoints of white conservatives, moderates, and liberals as well as Black nationalists, integrationists, moderates, civil rights leaders, and Black power advocates. Burkholder also simplifies a complex history with excellent writing, representative vignettes, and amplified voices of scholars, leaders, teachers, parents, and students. Inevitably, even the most comprehensive studies may fail to feature every example or city. Burkholder deftly chooses representative samples to demonstrate both support for and opposition to integration. Such an approach can also lead to some viewpoints receiving minimal coverage. It would have been useful to see more coverage of Black nationalism in the earlier eras as well as more Black views of community control. Finally, perhaps the study should have ended prior to the contemporary period, because the examples beyond 2007 are limited. These are all minor points of preference rather than critiques. So much of the history of northern Black education is only found in case studies or limited to certain eras. This study is timely, extensive, and a major contribution to the history of African American education. More significantly, it reminds us that both strategies of integration and separation were thoughtful responses in the various historical contexts. Certainly, Black people should be integrated into the larger society to fulfill their roles as citizens, claim the luxuries of freedom, and avoid underfunded and inequitable education. They should also be free to value an education in Black-controlled spaces where students can be nurtured and cultivated to their highest potential, as Vanessa Siddle Walker has argued. Throughout the back-and-forth between these strategies, white supremacy has truncated both responses. The value of these continued debates is evidence that Black people are unwilling to sit back and allow white supremacy to continue unabated.
莎朗·李。《看不见、听不见的少数族裔:伊利诺伊大学新不伦瑞克分校的亚裔学生》:罗格斯大学出版社,2021。172页。
经过调查,伯克霍尔德似乎没有放过什么线索。资料来源包括报纸、研究报告、法庭案件、全国有色人种协进会的文件、学校董事会的记录,以及大量的二手资料。她处理白人保守派、温和派和自由派的不同观点,以及黑人民族主义者、种族融合主义者、温和派、民权领袖和黑人权力倡导者的不同观点。伯克霍尔德还简化了复杂的历史与优秀的写作,代表性的小插曲,并扩大了学者,领导人,教师,家长和学生的声音。不可避免的是,即使是最全面的研究也可能无法涵盖每个例子或城市。伯克霍尔德巧妙地选择有代表性的样本来证明支持和反对整合。这样的方法也可能导致一些观点得到最少的报道。如果在早期看到更多关于黑人民族主义的报道,以及更多黑人对社区控制的看法,那将是有益的。最后,也许这项研究应该在当代之前就结束,因为2007年以后的例子是有限的。这些都是次要的偏好,而不是批评。如此多的北方黑人教育史只能在案例研究中找到,或者局限于某些时代。这项研究及时、广泛,对非裔美国人教育史做出了重大贡献。更重要的是,它提醒我们,无论是整合还是分离策略,都是在不同历史背景下的深思熟虑的回应。当然,黑人应该融入更大的社会,以履行他们作为公民的角色,享有自由的奢侈品,避免资金不足和不公平的教育。正如瓦妮莎·希德·沃克(Vanessa Siddle Walker)所主张的那样,他们也应该自由地重视在黑人控制的空间里接受教育,在那里学生可以得到培养,发挥最大的潜力。在这两种策略的反复较量中,白人至上主义削弱了两种回应。这些持续辩论的价值表明,黑人不愿坐视白人至上主义有增无减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: History of Education Quarterly publishes topics that span the history of education, both formal and nonformal, including the history of childhood, youth, and the family. The subjects are not limited to any time period and are universal in scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信