Distribution of temperature and residual stresses in GMA-DED based wire-arc additive manufacturing

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
S. Srivastava, R. K. Garg, A. Sachdeva, Vishal S. Sharma, Sehijpal Singh, M. Gupta
{"title":"Distribution of temperature and residual stresses in GMA-DED based wire-arc additive manufacturing","authors":"S. Srivastava, R. K. Garg, A. Sachdeva, Vishal S. Sharma, Sehijpal Singh, M. Gupta","doi":"10.1108/rpj-01-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nGas metal arc-based directed energy deposition (GMA-DED) process experiences residual stress (RS) developed due to heat accumulation during successive layer deposition as a significant challenge. To address that, monitoring of transient temperature distribution concerning time is a critical input. Finite element analysis (FEA) is considered a decisive engineering tool in quantifying temperature and RS in all manufacturing processes. However, computational time and prediction accuracy has always been a matter of concern for FEA-based prediction of responses in the GMA-DED process. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of finite element mesh variations on the developed RS in the GMA-DED process.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe variation in the element shape functions, i.e. linear- and quadratic-interpolation elements, has been used to model a single-track 10-layered thin-walled component in Ansys parametric design language. Two cases have been proposed in this study: Case 1 has been meshed with the linear-interpolation elements and Case 2 has been meshed with the combination of linear- and quadratic-interpolation elements. Furthermore, the modelled responses are authenticated with the experimental results measured through the data acquisition system for temperature and RS.\n\n\nFindings\nA good agreement of temperature and RS profile has been observed between predicted and experimental values. Considering similar parameters, Case 1 produced an average error of 4.13%, whereas Case 2 produced an average error of 23.45% in temperature prediction. Besides, comparing the longitudinal stress in the transverse direction for Cases 1 and 2 produced an error of 8.282% and 12.796%, respectively.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo avoid the costly and time-taking experimental approach, the experts have suggested the utilization of numerical methods in the design optimization of engineering problems. The FEA approach, however, is a subtle tool, still, it faces high computational cost and low accuracy based on the choice of selected element technology. This research can serve as a basis for the choice of element technology which can predict better responses in the thermo-mechanical modelling of the GMA-DED process.\n","PeriodicalId":20981,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Prototyping Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Prototyping Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-01-2023-0032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Gas metal arc-based directed energy deposition (GMA-DED) process experiences residual stress (RS) developed due to heat accumulation during successive layer deposition as a significant challenge. To address that, monitoring of transient temperature distribution concerning time is a critical input. Finite element analysis (FEA) is considered a decisive engineering tool in quantifying temperature and RS in all manufacturing processes. However, computational time and prediction accuracy has always been a matter of concern for FEA-based prediction of responses in the GMA-DED process. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of finite element mesh variations on the developed RS in the GMA-DED process. Design/methodology/approach The variation in the element shape functions, i.e. linear- and quadratic-interpolation elements, has been used to model a single-track 10-layered thin-walled component in Ansys parametric design language. Two cases have been proposed in this study: Case 1 has been meshed with the linear-interpolation elements and Case 2 has been meshed with the combination of linear- and quadratic-interpolation elements. Furthermore, the modelled responses are authenticated with the experimental results measured through the data acquisition system for temperature and RS. Findings A good agreement of temperature and RS profile has been observed between predicted and experimental values. Considering similar parameters, Case 1 produced an average error of 4.13%, whereas Case 2 produced an average error of 23.45% in temperature prediction. Besides, comparing the longitudinal stress in the transverse direction for Cases 1 and 2 produced an error of 8.282% and 12.796%, respectively. Originality/value To avoid the costly and time-taking experimental approach, the experts have suggested the utilization of numerical methods in the design optimization of engineering problems. The FEA approach, however, is a subtle tool, still, it faces high computational cost and low accuracy based on the choice of selected element technology. This research can serve as a basis for the choice of element technology which can predict better responses in the thermo-mechanical modelling of the GMA-DED process.
基于GMA-DED的线弧增材制造中温度和残余应力的分布
目的气体金属电弧定向能沉积(GMA-DED)工艺面临着一个重大挑战,即在连续的层沉积过程中,由于热量积累而产生的残余应力(RS)。为了解决这一问题,监测与时间有关的瞬态温度分布是一个关键输入。有限元分析(FEA)被认为是量化所有制造过程中的温度和RS的决定性工程工具。然而,计算时间和预测精度一直是GMA-DED过程中基于有限元分析的响应预测所关注的问题。因此,本研究旨在研究GMA-DED过程中有限元网格变化对所开发RS的影响。设计/方法/方法单元形状函数的变化,即线性和二次插值单元,已用于在Ansys参数化设计语言中对单轨10层薄壁构件进行建模。本研究提出了两种情况:情况1采用线性插值单元进行网格划分,情况2采用线性和二次插值单元的组合进行网格划分。此外,模型响应与通过温度和RS数据采集系统测量的实验结果进行了验证。结果表明,在预测值和实验值之间,温度和RS剖面具有良好的一致性。考虑到类似的参数,情况1的温度预测平均误差为4.13%,而情况2的温度预测的平均误差为23.45%。此外,比较情况1和情况2的横向纵向应力,误差分别为8.282%和12.796%。独创性/价值为了避免昂贵和耗时的实验方法,专家们建议在工程问题的设计优化中使用数值方法。然而,有限元分析方法是一种微妙的工具,它仍然面临着高计算成本和低精度的选择,基于选定的单元技术。这项研究可以作为选择元素技术的基础,该技术可以在GMA-DED过程的热机械建模中预测更好的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4.6 months
期刊介绍: Rapid Prototyping Journal concentrates on development in a manufacturing environment but covers applications in other areas, such as medicine and construction. All papers published in this field are scattered over a wide range of international publications, none of which actually specializes in this particular discipline, this journal is a vital resource for anyone involved in additive manufacturing. It draws together important refereed papers on all aspects of AM from distinguished sources all over the world, to give a truly international perspective on this dynamic and exciting area. -Benchmarking – certification and qualification in AM- Mass customisation in AM- Design for AM- Materials aspects- Reviews of processes/applications- CAD and other software aspects- Enhancement of existing processes- Integration with design process- Management implications- New AM processes- Novel applications of AM parts- AM for tooling- Medical applications- Reverse engineering in relation to AM- Additive & Subtractive hybrid manufacturing- Industrialisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信