Risk-return optimised energy asset allocation in transmission-distribution system using tangency portfolio and Black–Litterman model

IF 1.6 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Jisma M, Vivek Mohan, Mini Shaji Thomas
{"title":"Risk-return optimised energy asset allocation in transmission-distribution system using tangency portfolio and Black–Litterman model","authors":"Jisma M,&nbsp;Vivek Mohan,&nbsp;Mini Shaji Thomas","doi":"10.1049/esi2.12102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The application of Markowitz and tangency portfolio and Black–Litterman models is extended by the authors to energy portfolio selection in transmission-distribution environments with high penetration of renewable energy. As Transmission System Operator (TSO) and Distribution System Operator (DSO) contextually take mutualistic or conflicting positions in their portfolio selection process, their risk-return interactions and behaviours depend on their subjective views on generation and operation. Here, the financial portfolio allocation tool Black–Litterman Model is adapted to incorporate subjective views of the operators to arrive at more intuitive portfolios. The best portfolios are searched within the acceptable risk-return search space of each operator defined by their Markowitz efficient frontiers (EF), for Pareto-optimising their profits. The tangency portfolio approach, which is generally used to determine the portfolio of risky and risk-free assets in finance, is used here to determine the portfolio of renewable (energy-risky) and fuel-based sources (energy-risk-free). The proposed methodology is adopted in an HV–MV interconnected test system operated by one TSO and two DSOs, having wind, solar, coal, gas and nuclear generation technologies. It is observed that completely customisable portfolios can be constructed for TSO and DSO based on their inherent financial and energy risk-return behaviours and posterior views.</p>","PeriodicalId":33288,"journal":{"name":"IET Energy Systems Integration","volume":"5 3","pages":"290-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/esi2.12102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Energy Systems Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/esi2.12102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of Markowitz and tangency portfolio and Black–Litterman models is extended by the authors to energy portfolio selection in transmission-distribution environments with high penetration of renewable energy. As Transmission System Operator (TSO) and Distribution System Operator (DSO) contextually take mutualistic or conflicting positions in their portfolio selection process, their risk-return interactions and behaviours depend on their subjective views on generation and operation. Here, the financial portfolio allocation tool Black–Litterman Model is adapted to incorporate subjective views of the operators to arrive at more intuitive portfolios. The best portfolios are searched within the acceptable risk-return search space of each operator defined by their Markowitz efficient frontiers (EF), for Pareto-optimising their profits. The tangency portfolio approach, which is generally used to determine the portfolio of risky and risk-free assets in finance, is used here to determine the portfolio of renewable (energy-risky) and fuel-based sources (energy-risk-free). The proposed methodology is adopted in an HV–MV interconnected test system operated by one TSO and two DSOs, having wind, solar, coal, gas and nuclear generation technologies. It is observed that completely customisable portfolios can be constructed for TSO and DSO based on their inherent financial and energy risk-return behaviours and posterior views.

Abstract Image

使用相切投资组合和Black–Litterman模型优化输电配电系统中的风险收益能源资产配置
将Markowitz和切线投资组合模型以及Black-Litterman模型推广到可再生能源高渗透率输配环境下的能源组合选择中。由于输电系统运营商(TSO)和配电系统运营商(DSO)在其投资组合选择过程中采取互惠或冲突的立场,他们的风险回报相互作用和行为取决于他们对发电和运营的主观看法。在这里,金融投资组合配置工具Black-Litterman模型进行了调整,纳入了操作者的主观观点,以获得更直观的投资组合。在由Markowitz有效边界(EF)定义的每个运营商的可接受风险回报搜索空间内搜索最佳投资组合,以实现其利润的帕累托优化。切线投资组合方法通常用于确定金融领域的风险资产和无风险资产的投资组合,这里用于确定可再生能源(有能源风险)和基于燃料的资源(无能源风险)的投资组合。所提出的方法被采用在由一个TSO和两个dso操作的高压-中压互连测试系统中,该系统具有风能、太阳能、煤炭、天然气和核能发电技术。观察到,基于TSO和DSO固有的财务和能源风险回报行为以及后验观点,可以构建完全可定制的投资组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Energy Systems Integration
IET Energy Systems Integration Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信