Silviculture and community forestry: looking backwards, looking forwards

D. Gilmour
{"title":"Silviculture and community forestry: looking backwards, looking forwards","authors":"D. Gilmour","doi":"10.3126/BANKO.V27I3.20536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silviculture is about the deliberate manipulation of a forest to achieve defined objectives. It can be thought of as the art of producing and tending a forest. The notion of “appropriate” silviculture is very important when considering silviculture for community forests because silvicultural approaches and prescriptions need to be appropriate for local users while also ensuring that they promote the long term sustainability of the forest. Experience suggests that not all community forests require the application of sophisticated silvicultural regimes or the use of inventory data to schedule yields. Many can be managed perfectly well by the application of very simple silvicultural regimes and little or no need to collect inventory data. The needs of the most complex situation (sophisticated silvicultural system and inventory) should not be the model for all community forestry silviculture. At best, conventional silvicultural regimes and inventory practices require major revision for community forestry. It is clear that community forestry will achieve its full potential only if a holistic view is taken and a number of enabling conditionalities are met. These include: secure tenure, an enabling regulatory framework, strong governance, viable technology (including appropriate silviculture), adequate market knowledge and a supportive bureaucracy. These all need to be present for community forestry to operate at its full potential to deliver the biophysical and socio-economic outcomes that are expected of it. Viable technology, including appropriate silviculture informed by good science, is one of these important conditionalities but it is not the only one. Sustainable outcomes require much more than the application of technical forestry. Banko JanakariA Journal of Forestry Information for Nepal Special Issue No. 4, 2018, Page : 6-14 ","PeriodicalId":89659,"journal":{"name":"Banko janakari","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/BANKO.V27I3.20536","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banko janakari","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/BANKO.V27I3.20536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Silviculture is about the deliberate manipulation of a forest to achieve defined objectives. It can be thought of as the art of producing and tending a forest. The notion of “appropriate” silviculture is very important when considering silviculture for community forests because silvicultural approaches and prescriptions need to be appropriate for local users while also ensuring that they promote the long term sustainability of the forest. Experience suggests that not all community forests require the application of sophisticated silvicultural regimes or the use of inventory data to schedule yields. Many can be managed perfectly well by the application of very simple silvicultural regimes and little or no need to collect inventory data. The needs of the most complex situation (sophisticated silvicultural system and inventory) should not be the model for all community forestry silviculture. At best, conventional silvicultural regimes and inventory practices require major revision for community forestry. It is clear that community forestry will achieve its full potential only if a holistic view is taken and a number of enabling conditionalities are met. These include: secure tenure, an enabling regulatory framework, strong governance, viable technology (including appropriate silviculture), adequate market knowledge and a supportive bureaucracy. These all need to be present for community forestry to operate at its full potential to deliver the biophysical and socio-economic outcomes that are expected of it. Viable technology, including appropriate silviculture informed by good science, is one of these important conditionalities but it is not the only one. Sustainable outcomes require much more than the application of technical forestry. Banko JanakariA Journal of Forestry Information for Nepal Special Issue No. 4, 2018, Page : 6-14 
林业与社区林业:回顾,展望
造林是指为了达到特定的目标而对森林进行刻意的操纵。它可以被认为是种植和照料森林的艺术。在考虑社区森林的造林时,“适当”造林的概念非常重要,因为造林方法和方法必须适合当地用户,同时也要确保它们促进森林的长期可持续性。经验表明,并非所有社区森林都需要采用复杂的造林制度或使用清单数据来安排产量。许多森林可以通过应用非常简单的造林制度而得到很好的管理,很少或根本不需要收集盘存数据。最复杂的情况(复杂的造林系统和库存)的需要不应成为所有社区林业造林的模式。在最好的情况下,传统的造林制度和清查做法需要对社区林业进行重大修订。显然,只有采取全面的观点并满足若干有利的条件,社区林业才能充分发挥其潜力。这些包括:有保障的权属、有利的管理框架、强有力的治理、可行的技术(包括适当的造林)、充分的市场知识和支持性的官僚机构。社区林业要充分发挥其潜力,实现预期的生物物理和社会经济成果,就必须具备所有这些条件。可行的技术,包括良好科学指导下的适当造林,是这些重要的条件之一,但不是唯一的条件。可持续成果需要的远不止技术林业的应用。《尼泊尔林业信息》2018年第4期特刊,第6-14页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信