Das Zeitalter der Ambiguität. Vom Umgang mit Werten und Normen in der Frühen Neuzeit By Hillard von Thiessen. Cologne and Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2021. Pp. 447. Cloth €60.00. ISBN: 978-3412521202.

IF 0.4 3区 人文科学 Q1 HISTORY
J. Whaley
{"title":"Das Zeitalter der Ambiguität. Vom Umgang mit Werten und Normen in der Frühen Neuzeit By Hillard von Thiessen. Cologne and Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2021. Pp. 447. Cloth €60.00. ISBN: 978-3412521202.","authors":"J. Whaley","doi":"10.1017/S0008938922001686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whatwas “modern” about earlymodern Europe? The term is relatively new, dating from themidtwentieth century, before which these centuries were simply included under the heading “modern history.” The neologism implies a dividing line somewhere between the mid-eighteenth century and the early nineteenth century and was often simply abbreviated as “1789.” Some viewed the early modern period as a transitional era. Others agreed with Winfried Schulze’s view, articulated in 1983, that it was a “pattern book of modernity,” an age in which Europeans experimented with solutions to problems, thrown up largely by the Reformation, in ways which prefigured the pluralistic society that emerged in modern Europe. Increasingly, however, and partly reflecting wider growing anxieties about modernity and progress in the West, scholars have questioned these assumptions. Some point to continuities between the Middle Ages and the early modern period, even across the Reformation and all the confessional and secular changes associated with it. Others emphasise the differentness of early modern society and culture, the distinctively unmodern character of its culture, thought, and practice. Hillard von Thiessen believes that the debate has become rather sterile. He favours the new approaches of cultural historians but suggests that their suspicion of master narratives prevents them from using their research to see the bigger picture. His new book suggests an approach which takes account of all recent “turns” and offers an overall view of the period. It is, he emphasises, not a new comprehensive account of early modern European history but a possible way of approaching that history which captures its distinctive character. Instead of starting with the realm of political and military decision-making or with the overarching structures which conditioned the lives of individuals, von Thiessen wants to view history from the perspective of those individuals themselves. Their lives were hedged about with norms (rules) and values (ideals). How did they deal with them and how did their perceptions and reactions contribute to the process of historical change? Variations of social status, gender, age, or profession, among other factors, ensured a huge variety of responses and modes of behaviour, some conformist, others antagonistic. Norms often conflicted with values. This generated uncertainty, which individuals had to negotiate. According to von Thiessen, the willingness and ability of individuals to engage with the contradictions of their time, the ability to live with and accept ambiguity, is the true characteristic of early modern society. This bold thesis is elaborated in two stages, starting with an outline of the development of three kinds of norms in Western society after the fifteenth century. Firstly, the various late medieval church reform movements aimed to establish norms of belief and Christian behaviour. The Reformation resulted in the failure to reform the universal church. Instead, the aspiration to create such norms fuelled the development of discrete confessions, each of which ultimately sought to impose its own version of Christian discipline on its members. At the same time,","PeriodicalId":45053,"journal":{"name":"Central European History","volume":"56 1","pages":"100 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938922001686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"人文科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whatwas “modern” about earlymodern Europe? The term is relatively new, dating from themidtwentieth century, before which these centuries were simply included under the heading “modern history.” The neologism implies a dividing line somewhere between the mid-eighteenth century and the early nineteenth century and was often simply abbreviated as “1789.” Some viewed the early modern period as a transitional era. Others agreed with Winfried Schulze’s view, articulated in 1983, that it was a “pattern book of modernity,” an age in which Europeans experimented with solutions to problems, thrown up largely by the Reformation, in ways which prefigured the pluralistic society that emerged in modern Europe. Increasingly, however, and partly reflecting wider growing anxieties about modernity and progress in the West, scholars have questioned these assumptions. Some point to continuities between the Middle Ages and the early modern period, even across the Reformation and all the confessional and secular changes associated with it. Others emphasise the differentness of early modern society and culture, the distinctively unmodern character of its culture, thought, and practice. Hillard von Thiessen believes that the debate has become rather sterile. He favours the new approaches of cultural historians but suggests that their suspicion of master narratives prevents them from using their research to see the bigger picture. His new book suggests an approach which takes account of all recent “turns” and offers an overall view of the period. It is, he emphasises, not a new comprehensive account of early modern European history but a possible way of approaching that history which captures its distinctive character. Instead of starting with the realm of political and military decision-making or with the overarching structures which conditioned the lives of individuals, von Thiessen wants to view history from the perspective of those individuals themselves. Their lives were hedged about with norms (rules) and values (ideals). How did they deal with them and how did their perceptions and reactions contribute to the process of historical change? Variations of social status, gender, age, or profession, among other factors, ensured a huge variety of responses and modes of behaviour, some conformist, others antagonistic. Norms often conflicted with values. This generated uncertainty, which individuals had to negotiate. According to von Thiessen, the willingness and ability of individuals to engage with the contradictions of their time, the ability to live with and accept ambiguity, is the true characteristic of early modern society. This bold thesis is elaborated in two stages, starting with an outline of the development of three kinds of norms in Western society after the fifteenth century. Firstly, the various late medieval church reform movements aimed to establish norms of belief and Christian behaviour. The Reformation resulted in the failure to reform the universal church. Instead, the aspiration to create such norms fuelled the development of discrete confessions, each of which ultimately sought to impose its own version of Christian discipline on its members. At the same time,
模棱两可的时代。希拉德·冯·蒂森《现代早期对价值和规范的处理》。科隆和维也纳:Böhlau Verlag,2021。第447页。布料60.00欧元。ISBN:978-3412521202。
早期现代欧洲的“现代”是什么?这个词相对较新,可以追溯到20世纪中期,在此之前,这些世纪被简单地包含在“现代史”的标题下。这个新词意味着18世纪中期和19世纪初之间的分界线,通常被简单地缩写为“1789”。一些人认为现代早期是一个过渡时期。其他人同意温弗里德·舒尔茨在1983年提出的观点,即这是一本“现代性的模式书”,在这个时代,欧洲人尝试解决主要由宗教改革引发的问题,以预示着现代欧洲出现的多元化社会。然而,学者们越来越多地质疑这些假设,这在一定程度上反映了人们对西方现代性和进步日益增长的焦虑。一些人指出中世纪和现代早期之间的连续性,甚至贯穿宗教改革以及与之相关的所有忏悔和世俗变革。另一些人则强调现代早期社会和文化的差异,其文化、思想和实践具有明显的非现代性。希拉德·冯·蒂森认为,这场辩论已经变得相当乏味。他赞成文化历史学家的新方法,但认为他们对大师叙事的怀疑使他们无法利用自己的研究来看到更大的图景。他的新书提出了一种考虑到最近所有“转折”的方法,并提供了对这一时期的总体看法。他强调,这并不是对早期现代欧洲历史的一种新的全面描述,而是一种可能的方式来处理这段历史,捕捉其独特的特征。冯·蒂森不想从政治和军事决策领域或制约个人生活的总体结构开始,而是想从这些人自己的角度来看待历史。他们的生活被规范(规则)和价值观(理想)所包围。他们是如何应对的,他们的看法和反应是如何对历史变化的过程做出贡献的?社会地位、性别、年龄或职业的变化,以及其他因素,确保了各种各样的反应和行为模式,有些是顺从的,有些是敌对的。规范往往与价值观相冲突。这产生了不确定性,个人不得不进行谈判。根据冯•泰森的观点,个人处理时代矛盾的意愿和能力,与歧义共存并接受歧义的能力,是早期现代社会的真正特征。这篇大胆的论文分两个阶段进行阐述,首先概述了15世纪后西方社会三种规范的发展。首先,中世纪晚期的各种教会改革运动旨在建立信仰和基督教行为规范。宗教改革导致了普世教会改革的失败。相反,建立这种规范的愿望推动了离散忏悔的发展,每一种忏悔最终都试图将自己版本的基督教纪律强加给其成员。同时
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信