INVESTIGATING THE USE OF EFL TEACHERS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING CLASSES

Iva Dian Nadifa
{"title":"INVESTIGATING THE USE OF EFL TEACHERS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING CLASSES","authors":"Iva Dian Nadifa","doi":"10.30743/ll.v6i2.6179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As far as making errors is unavoidable in speaking class, oral corrective feedback (OCF) plays a crucial role to solve that problem. For the past two decades, OCF has become the debatable issue among researchers. This present study was conducted in one of the English courses in East Java, Indonesia. The participants were one native teacher and one non-native teacher teaching two different classes alternately.  The speaking class was for elementary school students. This qualitative study has several aims; 1) to investigate the distribution of OCF types that providing by the teachers in the speaking class, 2) to know whether or not there is an ignorance of the errors by the teachers and the reason behind it, 3) the types of OCF that often used by the teachers. The data was collected through video recording, stimulated recall and semi-structured interview. The results evinced that the teachers provided all the types of OCF to the students with different portions of usage. Recast became the type of OCF that is commonly used by teachers. Furthermore, the teachers corrected almost of the student’s errors. Unfortunately, there several ones that ignored by them. The ignorance of the student’s error due to some reasons such as tiredness and lack of knowledge. Nevertheless, the most prominent reasons were they did not want interrupt the student’s utterances in order to not create the students’ negative feelings about OCF.","PeriodicalId":53061,"journal":{"name":"Language Literacy Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Literacy Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v6i2.6179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As far as making errors is unavoidable in speaking class, oral corrective feedback (OCF) plays a crucial role to solve that problem. For the past two decades, OCF has become the debatable issue among researchers. This present study was conducted in one of the English courses in East Java, Indonesia. The participants were one native teacher and one non-native teacher teaching two different classes alternately.  The speaking class was for elementary school students. This qualitative study has several aims; 1) to investigate the distribution of OCF types that providing by the teachers in the speaking class, 2) to know whether or not there is an ignorance of the errors by the teachers and the reason behind it, 3) the types of OCF that often used by the teachers. The data was collected through video recording, stimulated recall and semi-structured interview. The results evinced that the teachers provided all the types of OCF to the students with different portions of usage. Recast became the type of OCF that is commonly used by teachers. Furthermore, the teachers corrected almost of the student’s errors. Unfortunately, there several ones that ignored by them. The ignorance of the student’s error due to some reasons such as tiredness and lack of knowledge. Nevertheless, the most prominent reasons were they did not want interrupt the student’s utterances in order to not create the students’ negative feelings about OCF.
英语教师口语纠正反馈在口语课堂上的应用研究
由于在口语课上犯错误是不可避免的,因此口头纠正反馈(OCF)在解决这一问题方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在过去的二十年里,OCF已经成为研究人员争论的问题。本研究是在印度尼西亚东爪哇的一个英语课程中进行的。参与者是一名本土教师和一名非本土教师,交替教授两个不同的班级。口语课是为小学生开设的。这项定性研究有几个目的;1) 调查教师在口语课堂上提供的OCF类型的分布,2)了解教师是否忽视了错误及其背后的原因,3)教师经常使用的OCF的类型。数据是通过录像、刺激回忆和半结构化访谈收集的。结果表明,教师为不同使用部位的学生提供了各种类型的OCF。Recast成为教师常用的OCF类型。此外,老师几乎纠正了学生的错误。不幸的是,有几个被他们忽视了。由于疲劳和缺乏知识等原因而忽视学生的错误。然而,最突出的原因是他们不想打断学生的话语,以免造成学生对强迫症的负面情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信