Opportunities for Public Participation Influence on the Russian Waste Management Reform: Statistical Analysis

D. Tinyakov
{"title":"Opportunities for Public Participation Influence on the Russian Waste Management Reform: Statistical Analysis","authors":"D. Tinyakov","doi":"10.22394/1726-1139-2022-12-87-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the opportunities for civic participation to influence the results of policy processes in hybrid regimes on the example of the modern Russian waste management reform. The goal of the article is to identify to what extent and under what conditions civic participation was a significant factor in the outputs of the reform in the regions. Based on the provisions of the concepts of authoritarian responsiveness and regional political regimes, assumptions were made about the significance of the factor of civic participation under conditions of combination with certain features of the regions: the level of consolidation of the political system, the openness of the regional bureaucracy, and the degree of dependence on the federal center. Data for 69 constituent entities of the Russian Federation for 2018–2019 were analyzed by statistical methods (models of ordinal and logistic regressions). The results of the analysis show that civic participation was a significant factor in reform outcomes in regions with less transparent bureaucracies and in regions less dependent on the center. At the same time, apart from these conditions, the level of civic participation was not a significant factor in itself. Thus, we can conclude that in hybrid regimes, civic participation can be a significant factor in the policy process if a) the elites are more susceptible to the risks of protest activity (in regions less dependent on the center, the support of the population is more important to the authorities), or b ) if there are informal channels of interaction between the state and society (regions with more closed administrations), which is consistent with the provisions of the concept of authoritarian responsiveness. In turn, the results of the study testify in favor of the “limited pluralism” approach, according to which civic participation in nondemocracies, although performing the main function of ensuring regime stability, can nevertheless have a significant impact on the outcomes of policy processes under certain conditions.","PeriodicalId":33085,"journal":{"name":"Upravlencheskoe konsul''tirovanie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlencheskoe konsul''tirovanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-12-87-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the opportunities for civic participation to influence the results of policy processes in hybrid regimes on the example of the modern Russian waste management reform. The goal of the article is to identify to what extent and under what conditions civic participation was a significant factor in the outputs of the reform in the regions. Based on the provisions of the concepts of authoritarian responsiveness and regional political regimes, assumptions were made about the significance of the factor of civic participation under conditions of combination with certain features of the regions: the level of consolidation of the political system, the openness of the regional bureaucracy, and the degree of dependence on the federal center. Data for 69 constituent entities of the Russian Federation for 2018–2019 were analyzed by statistical methods (models of ordinal and logistic regressions). The results of the analysis show that civic participation was a significant factor in reform outcomes in regions with less transparent bureaucracies and in regions less dependent on the center. At the same time, apart from these conditions, the level of civic participation was not a significant factor in itself. Thus, we can conclude that in hybrid regimes, civic participation can be a significant factor in the policy process if a) the elites are more susceptible to the risks of protest activity (in regions less dependent on the center, the support of the population is more important to the authorities), or b ) if there are informal channels of interaction between the state and society (regions with more closed administrations), which is consistent with the provisions of the concept of authoritarian responsiveness. In turn, the results of the study testify in favor of the “limited pluralism” approach, according to which civic participation in nondemocracies, although performing the main function of ensuring regime stability, can nevertheless have a significant impact on the outcomes of policy processes under certain conditions.
公众参与对俄罗斯废物管理改革影响的机会:统计分析
本文以现代俄罗斯废物管理改革为例,专门分析公民参与影响混合体制政策过程结果的机会。本文的目的是确定公民参与在何种程度上和在何种条件下是各地区改革成果的一个重要因素。在威权响应性和区域政治制度概念的规定基础上,结合区域政治制度的巩固程度、区域官僚机构的开放程度和对联邦中心的依赖程度等特征,对公民参与因素的重要性进行了假设。通过统计方法(有序和逻辑回归模型)分析了2018-2019年俄罗斯联邦69个组成实体的数据。分析结果表明,在官僚机构透明度较低和对中央依赖程度较低的地区,公民参与是影响改革结果的一个重要因素。同时,除了这些条件之外,公民参与的程度本身并不是一个重要因素。因此,我们可以得出结论,在混合政权中,如果a)精英更容易受到抗议活动风险的影响(在不太依赖中央的地区,民众的支持对当局更重要),或者b)国家与社会之间存在非正式的互动渠道(行政部门更封闭的地区),公民参与可能是政策过程中的一个重要因素。这与权威回应概念的规定是一致的。反过来,这项研究的结果证明了“有限多元主义”的观点,根据这种观点,非民主国家的公民参与,尽管发挥着确保政权稳定的主要功能,但在某些条件下,也会对政策过程的结果产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信