The Puzzle of Social Accumulation of Violence in Brazil: Some Remarks

Q3 Social Sciences
Michel Misse
{"title":"The Puzzle of Social Accumulation of Violence in Brazil: Some\n Remarks","authors":"Michel Misse","doi":"10.31389/JIED.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article comments on a new generation of researchers studying the illegal markets in Brazil. In doing so, I summarize the interpretative model of ‘social accumulation of violence’. Initially applied to Rio de Janeiro, several researchers have now expanded it to other Brazilian states as well as to countries with high violence rates, such as Colombia and Mexico. The model is both historical and social. It combines three main factors that have been feeding one another throughout times and expanded across several places: (1) social accumulation of disadvantages; (2) criminal subjection; and (3) expansion of acquisition strategies across networks of informality and illicit markets, for which the offer of political merchandise is decisive. As proposed in previous works, political merchandise means political assets originated from the privatization of segments of the State’s pretension to sovereignty over the monopoly of violence by different agents, who negotiate these assets in exchange for economic assets or other political goods. O artigo comenta trabalhos da nova geracao de pesquisadores dos mercados ilegais no Brasil, e resume o modelo sociologico interpretativo da ‘acumulacao social da violencia’, desenvolvido para o Rio de Janeiro, e utilizado por diferentes pesquisadores em diferentes casos com altas taxas de violencia, como Colombia e Mexico na America Latina. O modelo agrega tres elementos que se retroalimentam na escala do tempo e pela expansao espacial. E preciso que haja i) acumulacao social de desvantagens, ii) sujeicao criminal e iii) expansao de estrategias aquisitivas em redes baseadas na informalidade e em mercados ilegais, entre as quais e decisiva a oferta de mercadorias politicas. Mercadorias politicas sao bens de natureza politica (envolvendo a privatizacao de segmentos da pretensao de soberania do Estado sobre o monopolio da violencia) por diferentes agentes que os negociam por bens economicos ou outros bens politicos.  Publisher's Note: This article has been published in both Portuguese and English. To download the Portuguese version, click the \"Download\" link and select \"PDF (PT)\". Este artigo foi publicado tanto em Ingles, como em Portugues. Para baixar a versao em Portugues, clique \"Download\" e depois selecione \"PDF (PT)\".","PeriodicalId":73784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of illicit economies and development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of illicit economies and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/JIED.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The article comments on a new generation of researchers studying the illegal markets in Brazil. In doing so, I summarize the interpretative model of ‘social accumulation of violence’. Initially applied to Rio de Janeiro, several researchers have now expanded it to other Brazilian states as well as to countries with high violence rates, such as Colombia and Mexico. The model is both historical and social. It combines three main factors that have been feeding one another throughout times and expanded across several places: (1) social accumulation of disadvantages; (2) criminal subjection; and (3) expansion of acquisition strategies across networks of informality and illicit markets, for which the offer of political merchandise is decisive. As proposed in previous works, political merchandise means political assets originated from the privatization of segments of the State’s pretension to sovereignty over the monopoly of violence by different agents, who negotiate these assets in exchange for economic assets or other political goods. O artigo comenta trabalhos da nova geracao de pesquisadores dos mercados ilegais no Brasil, e resume o modelo sociologico interpretativo da ‘acumulacao social da violencia’, desenvolvido para o Rio de Janeiro, e utilizado por diferentes pesquisadores em diferentes casos com altas taxas de violencia, como Colombia e Mexico na America Latina. O modelo agrega tres elementos que se retroalimentam na escala do tempo e pela expansao espacial. E preciso que haja i) acumulacao social de desvantagens, ii) sujeicao criminal e iii) expansao de estrategias aquisitivas em redes baseadas na informalidade e em mercados ilegais, entre as quais e decisiva a oferta de mercadorias politicas. Mercadorias politicas sao bens de natureza politica (envolvendo a privatizacao de segmentos da pretensao de soberania do Estado sobre o monopolio da violencia) por diferentes agentes que os negociam por bens economicos ou outros bens politicos.  Publisher's Note: This article has been published in both Portuguese and English. To download the Portuguese version, click the "Download" link and select "PDF (PT)". Este artigo foi publicado tanto em Ingles, como em Portugues. Para baixar a versao em Portugues, clique "Download" e depois selecione "PDF (PT)".
巴西社会暴力积累之谜——兼论
这篇文章评论了新一代研究巴西非法市场的研究人员。在此过程中,我总结了“暴力的社会积累”的解释模型。一些研究人员最初将其应用于巴西里约热内卢,现在已将其扩展到巴西其他州以及暴力率高的国家,如哥伦比亚和墨西哥。这种模式既是历史的,也是社会的。它结合了三个主要因素,这些因素一直相互促进,并扩展到多个地方:(1)不利因素的社会积累;(二)刑事服从;(3)扩大非正式和非法市场网络的收购策略,其中政治商品的提供是决定性的。正如之前的著作所提出的那样,政治商品是指政治资产,源于不同代理人对国家对暴力垄断的主权主张的私有化,这些代理人通过谈判这些资产来换取经济资产或其他政治商品。在巴西,我们对“社会暴力累积”的社会学解释模式进行了评论;在巴西,我们对“社会暴力累积”的社会学解释模式进行了回顾;在巴西,我们对“社会暴力累积”的社会学解释模式进行了回顾;在哥伦比亚、墨西哥和拉丁美洲,我们对“不同的社会暴力累积”的社会学解释模式进行了回顾;因此,对于整体的树木元素来说,这是一种复古的风格,而对于扩展的空间来说,这是一种独特的风格。具体情况如下:(1)累积的社会劣势;(2)主观的刑事劣势;(3)扩大的战略劣势;(3)非正式的非法商品劣势;(3)决定的劣势;(3)政治商品劣势。“政治市场”是指不同的代理人,如谈判代理人、经济代理人、外部代理人、政治代理人等。作者注:本文以葡萄牙语和英语两种语言发布。如欲下载葡语版本,请按“下载”连结并选择“PDF (PT)”。“我的祖国,我的祖国,我的祖国,我的祖国。Para baixar和veresugues, clique“下载”和存款选择“PDF (PT)”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信