Self-Styled Madness: Fitzgerald's "Nightmare (Fantasy in Black)" and Poe's "The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether"

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Nicole J. Camastra
{"title":"Self-Styled Madness: Fitzgerald's \"Nightmare (Fantasy in Black)\" and Poe's \"The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether\"","authors":"Nicole J. Camastra","doi":"10.5325/FSCOTFITZREVI.18.1.0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Although no evidence suggests that F. Scott Fitzgerald read Edgar Allan Poe's little-known tale \"The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether\" (1845), his posthumously published story \"Nightmare (Fantasy in Black)\" offers riveting textual opportunities to read it as a development of Poe's concern for the lunatic, uncontrolled forces within and without the individual that threaten selfhood. Released in 2017 as part of a \"lost stories\" collection, \"Nightmare\" has received little critical attention. It provided some material for Tender Is the Night, but reading it as part of an ominous conversation with Poe positions it as an example of Fitzgerald's darker vision of American ambition: how it cannibalizes the self. This article explores what J. Gerald Kennedy calls the \"imaginative genealogy\" between both writers, first by contextualizing the composition of their respective stories against the backdrop of personal adversity, professional instability, and an American ethos, and then, by comparing key scenes and characters in the texts themselves. \"Nightmare\" and \"Tarr and Fether\" play with the proverbial understanding of reason and madness finally to suggest that, as Fitzgerald's subtitle implies, there is a \"Fantasy\" on the other side of the \"Nightmare.\"","PeriodicalId":40217,"journal":{"name":"F Scott Fitzgerald Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"143 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F Scott Fitzgerald Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/FSCOTFITZREVI.18.1.0143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Although no evidence suggests that F. Scott Fitzgerald read Edgar Allan Poe's little-known tale "The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether" (1845), his posthumously published story "Nightmare (Fantasy in Black)" offers riveting textual opportunities to read it as a development of Poe's concern for the lunatic, uncontrolled forces within and without the individual that threaten selfhood. Released in 2017 as part of a "lost stories" collection, "Nightmare" has received little critical attention. It provided some material for Tender Is the Night, but reading it as part of an ominous conversation with Poe positions it as an example of Fitzgerald's darker vision of American ambition: how it cannibalizes the self. This article explores what J. Gerald Kennedy calls the "imaginative genealogy" between both writers, first by contextualizing the composition of their respective stories against the backdrop of personal adversity, professional instability, and an American ethos, and then, by comparing key scenes and characters in the texts themselves. "Nightmare" and "Tarr and Fether" play with the proverbial understanding of reason and madness finally to suggest that, as Fitzgerald's subtitle implies, there is a "Fantasy" on the other side of the "Nightmare."
自封的疯狂:菲茨杰拉德的《噩梦(黑衣幻想)》和爱伦坡的《塔尔医生和费瑟教授的体制》
摘要:尽管没有证据表明F.Scott Fitzgerald阅读了埃德加·爱伦·坡鲜为人知的故事《塔尔医生和费瑟教授的系统》(1845),但他死后出版的故事《噩梦(黑色幻想)》提供了引人入胜的文本机会,可以将其解读为坡对疯子的关注的发展,个人内外威胁自我的不受控制的力量。《噩梦》于2017年作为“失落的故事”系列的一部分发行,几乎没有受到评论界的关注。它为《温柔是夜》提供了一些素材,但作为与坡不祥对话的一部分阅读它,将其定位为菲茨杰拉德对美国野心的黑暗愿景的一个例子:它如何吞噬自我。这篇文章探讨了J·杰拉尔德·肯尼迪所说的两位作家之间的“想象力谱系”,首先是在个人逆境、职业不稳定和美国精神的背景下,将他们各自故事的构成置于情境中,然后比较文本中的关键场景和人物。《噩梦》和《塔尔与费瑟》展现了对理性和疯狂的理解,最终表明,正如菲茨杰拉德的副标题所暗示的那样,《噩梦》的另一面有一个“幻想”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F Scott Fitzgerald Review
F Scott Fitzgerald Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书