Role of China's agricultural water policy reforms and production technology heterogeneity on agriculture water usage efficiency and total factor productivity change

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Wasi Ul Hassan Shah , Gang Hao , Rizwana Yasmeen , Hong Yan , Jintao Shen , Yuting Lu
{"title":"Role of China's agricultural water policy reforms and production technology heterogeneity on agriculture water usage efficiency and total factor productivity change","authors":"Wasi Ul Hassan Shah ,&nbsp;Gang Hao ,&nbsp;Rizwana Yasmeen ,&nbsp;Hong Yan ,&nbsp;Jintao Shen ,&nbsp;Yuting Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China introduced the \"agricultural water conversion policy\" in 2012 to efficiently utilize agricultural water resources and improve production technology in different regions of the Country to increase sustainable agriculture production. To this end, for Policy impact evaluation, our study employed slack-based measure data envelopment analysis, Meta frontier Analysis, and the Malmquist productivity index to measure the agriculture water usage efficiency, agriculture Production technology heterogeneity, and total factor productivity change in pre- and post-agriculture water policy (2012) implementation in different regions of China. Data for 31 provinces and cities were taken for efficiency and productivity estimation from 2000 to 2020. Results revealed that agriculture water usage efficiency significantly increased after the policy implementation. The average agricultural water usage efficiency score for the 2000–2012pre–policy period is 0.6763, whereas the average AWUE score for the 2013–2020 post–policy period is 0.7522, showing an increase of 11.22%. Further results show that the eastern region maintains superior agriculture production technology compared to the western and central regions, with an average technology gap ratio of 0.8941 during the study period. The average total factor productivity change for the study period is 1.0769. Technological change is the primary determinant of productivity growth. There was a marginal decline in average Productivity change after policy implementation. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis test strengthens the study's results by providing statistically significant differences among different periods and regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 108429"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002949","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

China introduced the "agricultural water conversion policy" in 2012 to efficiently utilize agricultural water resources and improve production technology in different regions of the Country to increase sustainable agriculture production. To this end, for Policy impact evaluation, our study employed slack-based measure data envelopment analysis, Meta frontier Analysis, and the Malmquist productivity index to measure the agriculture water usage efficiency, agriculture Production technology heterogeneity, and total factor productivity change in pre- and post-agriculture water policy (2012) implementation in different regions of China. Data for 31 provinces and cities were taken for efficiency and productivity estimation from 2000 to 2020. Results revealed that agriculture water usage efficiency significantly increased after the policy implementation. The average agricultural water usage efficiency score for the 2000–2012pre–policy period is 0.6763, whereas the average AWUE score for the 2013–2020 post–policy period is 0.7522, showing an increase of 11.22%. Further results show that the eastern region maintains superior agriculture production technology compared to the western and central regions, with an average technology gap ratio of 0.8941 during the study period. The average total factor productivity change for the study period is 1.0769. Technological change is the primary determinant of productivity growth. There was a marginal decline in average Productivity change after policy implementation. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis test strengthens the study's results by providing statistically significant differences among different periods and regions.

中国农业用水政策改革和生产技术异质性对农业用水效率和全要素生产率变化的影响
中国于2012年推出了“农业用水转换政策”,以有效利用农业水资源,提高全国不同地区的生产技术,增加农业可持续生产。为此,在政策影响评价方面,本研究采用基于slack的测度数据包络分析、Meta前沿分析和Malmquist生产力指数,对中国不同地区农业用水政策实施前后的农业用水效率、农业生产技术异质性和全要素生产率变化进行了测度。该研究采用了31个省市2000年至2020年的效率和生产率估算数据。结果表明,政策实施后农业用水效率显著提高。2000 - 2012年政策实施前农业用水效率平均得分为0.6763,2013-2020年政策实施后农业用水效率平均得分为0.7522,提高了11.22%。进一步的研究结果表明,东部地区的农业生产技术相对于西部和中部地区保持优势,研究期间的平均技术差距比为0.8941。研究期间的平均全要素生产率变化为1.0769。技术变革是生产率增长的主要决定因素。政策实施后,平均生产率变化略有下降。Mann-Whitney和Kruskal Wallis测试通过提供不同时期和地区之间的统计显着差异来加强研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信