How Do Listening Comprehension Processes Differ by Second Language Proficiency? Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Aiko Furuya
{"title":"How Do Listening Comprehension Processes Differ by Second Language Proficiency? Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives","authors":"Aiko Furuya","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2019.1694411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study aims to examine how listening comprehension processes (top-down and bottom-up) differ by second language proficiency. To investigate such differences, experiments (listening tasks) followed by questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants included 18 lower intermediate learners, 19 upper intermediate learners, and 23 advanced learners. Participants listened to materials under two conditions: (a) vocabulary knowledge; no background knowledge and (b) no vocabulary knowledge; background knowledge. Results showed that lower intermediate learners comprehended better in (a), whereas upper intermediate learners performed better in (b). No significant difference was observed between (a) and (b) for advanced learners.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":"35 1","pages":"123 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10904018.2019.1694411","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1694411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study aims to examine how listening comprehension processes (top-down and bottom-up) differ by second language proficiency. To investigate such differences, experiments (listening tasks) followed by questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants included 18 lower intermediate learners, 19 upper intermediate learners, and 23 advanced learners. Participants listened to materials under two conditions: (a) vocabulary knowledge; no background knowledge and (b) no vocabulary knowledge; background knowledge. Results showed that lower intermediate learners comprehended better in (a), whereas upper intermediate learners performed better in (b). No significant difference was observed between (a) and (b) for advanced learners.
第二语言水平对听力理解过程有何影响?自顶向下和自底向上的视角
摘要本研究旨在考察听力理解过程(自上而下和自下而上)如何因第二语言熟练程度而不同。为了调查这种差异,我们进行了实验(听力任务),然后进行了问卷调查和半结构化访谈。参与者包括18名初中学习者、19名高中学习者和23名高级学习者。参与者在两个条件下聆听材料:(a)词汇知识;没有背景知识和(b)没有词汇知识;背景知识。结果表明,初中生在(a)中理解得更好,而高中生在(b)中表现更好。高级学习者在(a)和(b)之间没有观察到显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信