"How Could We Not Go to Mosul?": Empathy, Anagnorisis, and the Politics of Recognition in Orestes in Mosul

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Theodoros Ioannou
{"title":"\"How Could We Not Go to Mosul?\": Empathy, Anagnorisis, and the Politics of Recognition in Orestes in Mosul","authors":"Theodoros Ioannou","doi":"10.3138/ctr.192.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article discusses Milo Rau's and the Ghent Ensemble's recent performance Orestes in Mosul (2019–2020) and the significance of representing ongoing conflict onstage. This article examines the ways in which the politics of recognition, a term coined by Charles Taylor and explored by many scholars after him, has given a renewed relevance to anagnorisis, a term coined by Aristotle and understood as a technical function of classical tragedy. Anagnorisis can be used as a means of accessing empathetic capacities that can in turn create an ethical framework for the reassessment of marginalized identities. In this way, anagnorisis ceases to be the realization of an erroneous action and becomes the protestation of an injustice and the structures of oppression that maintain and perpetuate it. Finally, this article addresses the controversy surrounding Milo Rau and Orestes in Mosul and concludes that at a time of major humanitarian crises, socially and politically engaged theatre can mean the difference between passively observing the practice of exploitation and actively practising solidarity.","PeriodicalId":42646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW","volume":"192 1","pages":"50 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ctr.192.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article discusses Milo Rau's and the Ghent Ensemble's recent performance Orestes in Mosul (2019–2020) and the significance of representing ongoing conflict onstage. This article examines the ways in which the politics of recognition, a term coined by Charles Taylor and explored by many scholars after him, has given a renewed relevance to anagnorisis, a term coined by Aristotle and understood as a technical function of classical tragedy. Anagnorisis can be used as a means of accessing empathetic capacities that can in turn create an ethical framework for the reassessment of marginalized identities. In this way, anagnorisis ceases to be the realization of an erroneous action and becomes the protestation of an injustice and the structures of oppression that maintain and perpetuate it. Finally, this article addresses the controversy surrounding Milo Rau and Orestes in Mosul and concludes that at a time of major humanitarian crises, socially and politically engaged theatre can mean the difference between passively observing the practice of exploitation and actively practising solidarity.
“我们怎么能不去摩苏尔?”《摩苏尔的俄瑞斯忒斯》中的同理心、Anagnorisis和认知政治
摘要:本文讨论了米洛·劳和根特合奏团最近在摩苏尔的演出《俄瑞斯忒斯》(2019-2020),以及在舞台上表现持续冲突的意义。本文考察了由查尔斯·泰勒(Charles Taylor)创造并在他之后被许多学者探索的“承认政治”(politics of recognition)与亚里士多德(Aristotle)创造并被理解为古典悲剧的技术功能的“anagnorisis”重新相关的方式。anagnoris可以作为一种获得同理心能力的手段,反过来又可以为重新评估边缘化身份创造一个伦理框架。通过这种方式,anagnosis不再是错误行为的实现,而成为对不公正的抗议,以及维持和延续它的压迫结构。最后,本文探讨围绕摩苏尔的Milo Rau和Orestes的争议,并得出结论,在重大人道主义危机时期,社会和政治参与的戏剧可能意味着被动观察剥削实践与积极实践团结之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信