Strategy adaptation for sustainable quality management in universities: a systematic literature review.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tolga Ozsen, Baris Uslu, Ahmet Aypay
{"title":"Strategy adaptation for sustainable quality management in universities: a systematic literature review.","authors":"Tolga Ozsen, Baris Uslu, Ahmet Aypay","doi":"10.1007/s11233-022-09098-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its roots in environmental discussions, sustainability has become a critical term influencing every aspect of organisations. As human-oriented institutions, universities have also embraced the 'sustainable development' concept on the quality of their internal and external services. Two overarching questions are most important for university managers to strategically guide sustainable quality development in their institutions: Which strategies do university managers adapt to construct a \"sustainable quality management\" structure in their universities? and how are these adapted strategies related to different aspects/components of universities? In response, we employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) protocol to analyse the existing studies in the related literature. During the systematic review, we followed five steps sequentially: i) defining the research question(s), ii) setting inclusion-exclusion criteria, iii) recording eligible studies, iv) quality overview of selected studies, and v) discussing prominent results. To integrate the results, we benefitted from five enablers in the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model and the sub-sections given in the European University Association's (EUA) institutional evaluation reports. The results revealed that the initial steps for university leadership to establish a 'Sustainable Quality Management' system are integrating a sustainable quality approach to the main strategy document, and then motivating their staff to participate in and enrich the reform-level cultural changes in their universities. This study also discusses the strategies adapted to sustain quality development in universities' teaching, research, societal services, and internationalisation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51727,"journal":{"name":"Tertiary Education and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tertiary Education and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-022-09098-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its roots in environmental discussions, sustainability has become a critical term influencing every aspect of organisations. As human-oriented institutions, universities have also embraced the 'sustainable development' concept on the quality of their internal and external services. Two overarching questions are most important for university managers to strategically guide sustainable quality development in their institutions: Which strategies do university managers adapt to construct a "sustainable quality management" structure in their universities? and how are these adapted strategies related to different aspects/components of universities? In response, we employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) protocol to analyse the existing studies in the related literature. During the systematic review, we followed five steps sequentially: i) defining the research question(s), ii) setting inclusion-exclusion criteria, iii) recording eligible studies, iv) quality overview of selected studies, and v) discussing prominent results. To integrate the results, we benefitted from five enablers in the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model and the sub-sections given in the European University Association's (EUA) institutional evaluation reports. The results revealed that the initial steps for university leadership to establish a 'Sustainable Quality Management' system are integrating a sustainable quality approach to the main strategy document, and then motivating their staff to participate in and enrich the reform-level cultural changes in their universities. This study also discusses the strategies adapted to sustain quality development in universities' teaching, research, societal services, and internationalisation practices.

Abstract Image

高校可持续质量管理的策略适应:系统文献综述
尽管可持续性起源于环境讨论,但它已成为影响组织各个方面的关键术语。作为一所以人为本的院校,大学在其内部和外部服务的质量上也采纳了“可持续发展”的理念。大学管理者在战略上引导其所在院校的可持续质量发展,最重要的两个问题是:大学管理者采用哪些战略来构建“可持续质量管理”结构?这些适应策略是如何与大学的不同方面/组成部分联系起来的?作为回应,我们采用系统文献综述(SLR)方案来分析相关文献中的现有研究。在系统评价中,我们依次遵循了五个步骤:i)定义研究问题,ii)设定纳入-排除标准,iii)记录符合条件的研究,iv)所选研究的质量概述,v)讨论突出的结果。为了整合结果,我们受益于欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)模型中的五个推动者,以及欧洲大学协会(EUA)机构评估报告中给出的子部分。结果表明,大学领导建立“可持续质量管理”体系的第一步是将可持续质量方法整合到主要战略文件中,然后激励其员工参与并丰富其大学改革层面的文化变革。本研究亦探讨了大学在教学、科研、社会服务及国际化实践方面维持高质素发展的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tertiary Education and Management
Tertiary Education and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Tertiary Education and Management (TEAM) is an international, interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed journal that welcomes research contributions that reflect upon, study or question main developmental trends and practices, and address current and future challenges in higher education. The thematic focus of TEAM includes management, governance and organisation of higher education; teaching and learning in higher education; the academic profession and academic careers; higher education and the labour market; and institutional research in higher education.  TEAM is jointly published by Springer and EAIR – The European Higher Education Society, and is intended to contribute to EAIR’s mission of creating a better linkage of research, policy and practice in higher education.Articles submitted should as a consequence be written for, understood by, and be relevant for a multicultural, multifaceted and international audience, consisting of both the international academic community and the field of practice within higher education.  TEAM welcomes articles using a variety of approaches, methods and perspectives given that the article demonstrate the relevance of the research in a broader context whether this be in other higher education institutions, other national settings or in the international arena.  Occasionally, the journal also publishes articles where personal viewpoints/experiences or political arguments are made to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education. Such pieces are published in a dedicated ''Forum'' section of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信