Whitney Battle-Baptiste. Black Feminist Archaeology (Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, 2011, 200 pp., 13 b/w illustr., 2 tables, pbk, ISBN 978-1-59874-379-1)

IF 1.2 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Kathleen Sterling
{"title":"Whitney Battle-Baptiste. Black Feminist Archaeology (Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, 2011, 200 pp., 13 b/w illustr., 2 tables, pbk, ISBN 978-1-59874-379-1)","authors":"Kathleen Sterling","doi":"10.1017/eaa.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archaeology, Oxford: Oxbow, pp.2–28 . Hamilakis, Y. 2002c. Too Many Chiefs? Factional Competition in Neopalatial Crete. In: Driessen, J., Schoep, I. & Laffineur, R. eds. Monuments of Minos: Rethinking the Minoan Palaces (Aegaeum 23). Liège: Université de Liège & University of Texas at Austin, pp.179–99. Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2 edition. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Martin, P. 1971. The Revolution in Archaeology. American Antiquity, 36: 1–8. Relaki, M. & Driessen, J. eds. 2020. OIKOS. Archaeological Approaches to House Societies in the Bronze Age Aegean. Louvain-laneuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain. Sahlins., M.D. 1972. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine. Schiffer, M. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity, 37: 156–65. Schoep, I., Tomkins, P. & Driessen, J. eds. 2012. Back to the Beginning: Reassessing Social and Political Complexity on Crete during the Early and Middle Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxbow books. Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Terrenato, N. & Haggis, D.C. eds. 2011. State Formation in Italy and Greece: Questioning the Neoevolutionist Paradigm. Oxford & Oakeville: Oxbow books . Thomas, J. 1996. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. London: Routledge.","PeriodicalId":46261,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2022.10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archaeology, Oxford: Oxbow, pp.2–28 . Hamilakis, Y. 2002c. Too Many Chiefs? Factional Competition in Neopalatial Crete. In: Driessen, J., Schoep, I. & Laffineur, R. eds. Monuments of Minos: Rethinking the Minoan Palaces (Aegaeum 23). Liège: Université de Liège & University of Texas at Austin, pp.179–99. Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2 edition. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Martin, P. 1971. The Revolution in Archaeology. American Antiquity, 36: 1–8. Relaki, M. & Driessen, J. eds. 2020. OIKOS. Archaeological Approaches to House Societies in the Bronze Age Aegean. Louvain-laneuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain. Sahlins., M.D. 1972. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine. Schiffer, M. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity, 37: 156–65. Schoep, I., Tomkins, P. & Driessen, J. eds. 2012. Back to the Beginning: Reassessing Social and Political Complexity on Crete during the Early and Middle Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxbow books. Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Terrenato, N. & Haggis, D.C. eds. 2011. State Formation in Italy and Greece: Questioning the Neoevolutionist Paradigm. Oxford & Oakeville: Oxbow books . Thomas, J. 1996. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. London: Routledge.
惠特尼Battle-Baptiste。《黑人女性主义考古学》(加利福尼亚核桃溪:左海岸出版社,2011年,200页,13页插图)。, 2表,pbk, ISBN 978-1-59874-379-1)
考古,牛津:牛津大学,第2–28页。哈米拉基斯,Y.2002c。酋长太多?新腭化克里特岛的派系竞争。在:Driesen,J.,Schoep,I.和Laffineur,R.编辑的《米诺斯纪念碑:重新思考米诺斯宫殿》(Aegaeum 23)。列日:列日大学和德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校,第179-99页。霍德,I.1986。阅读过去。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社。库恩,T.1970。《科学革命的结构》,第2版。芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社。Martin,P.1971。考古革命。《美国古董》,36:1-8。Relaki,M.和Driesen,J.编辑。2020。OIKOS。青铜时代爱琴海房屋社会的考古方法。卢旺大学出版社。萨林斯。,1972年出生。石器时代经济学。芝加哥:阿尔丁。Schiffer,M.1972。考古语境与系统语境。《美国古董》,37:156-65。Schoep,I.、Tomkins,P.和Driesen,J.编辑,2012年。回到开始:重新评估青铜时代早期和中期克里特岛的社会和政治复杂性。牛津:牛津图书。Shanks,M.和Tilley,C.1987。社会理论与考古学。剑桥:礼貌出版社。Terrenato,N.和Haggis,D.C.编辑,2011年。意大利和希腊的国家形成:对新进化论范式的质疑。牛津和奥克维尔:牛津图书。Thomas,J.,1996。时间、文化与身份:解读考古学。伦敦:劳特利奇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The publication organ of the European Association of Archaeologists, the European Journal of Archaeology seeks to promote open debate amongst archaeologists committed to a new idea of Europe in which there is more communication across national frontiers and more interest in interpretation. The journal accepts not only new empirical data and new interpretations of the past but also encourages debate about the role archaeology plays in society, how it should be organized in a changing Europe, and the ethics of archaeological practice. All periods are covered; papers, review articles, interviews and short "debate" pieces are all sought. Whilst English is the primary language of publication in the EJA, papers submitted in French or German will be given equal consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信