Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.

Tahseen A Chowdhury, Halima Khan, Maralyn R Druce, William M Drake, Ravindra Rajakariar, Raj Thuraisingham, Hamish Dobbie, Laila Parvanta, Francis Chinegwundoh, Ahmad Almushatat, Anthony Warrens, Elspeth M Alstead
{"title":"Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.","authors":"Tahseen A Chowdhury, Halima Khan, Maralyn R Druce, William M Drake, Ravindra Rajakariar, Raj Thuraisingham, Hamish Dobbie, Laila Parvanta, Francis Chinegwundoh, Ahmad Almushatat, Anthony Warrens, Elspeth M Alstead","doi":"10.7861/fhj.2018-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flipped learning is an approach in which core teaching is delivered using online material viewed prior to face-to-face learning, applying knowledge gained from online material. Core teaching in a module for third-year undergraduate medical students was based around a 1-week course comprising 32 hours of lectures. Feedback suggested that students were poorly engaged and attendance was poor.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and evaluate a programme of learning for medical students using flipped learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Core lectures were videoed and students were advised to watch online at home in the morning prior to a case-based interactive discussion session in the afternoon. Feedback was undertaken prior to and following change in delivery; changes in Likert scale feedback were assessed. Thematic assessment of free-text feedback was undertaken. Results of in-course assessment examinations were compared prior to and following change in delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Student feedback showed a significant improvement in satisfaction with flipped learning compared to standard lectures, both in scores and free-text feedback. Results of in-course assessments did not change between the two methods of delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flipped learning can improve student satisfaction and engagement with teaching, but our study has not demonstrated an improvement in assessment scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"192-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2018-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flipped learning is an approach in which core teaching is delivered using online material viewed prior to face-to-face learning, applying knowledge gained from online material. Core teaching in a module for third-year undergraduate medical students was based around a 1-week course comprising 32 hours of lectures. Feedback suggested that students were poorly engaged and attendance was poor.

Objectives: To develop and evaluate a programme of learning for medical students using flipped learning.

Methods: Core lectures were videoed and students were advised to watch online at home in the morning prior to a case-based interactive discussion session in the afternoon. Feedback was undertaken prior to and following change in delivery; changes in Likert scale feedback were assessed. Thematic assessment of free-text feedback was undertaken. Results of in-course assessment examinations were compared prior to and following change in delivery.

Results: Student feedback showed a significant improvement in satisfaction with flipped learning compared to standard lectures, both in scores and free-text feedback. Results of in-course assessments did not change between the two methods of delivery.

Conclusions: Flipped learning can improve student satisfaction and engagement with teaching, but our study has not demonstrated an improvement in assessment scores.

翻转学习:颠覆医学教育
摘要背景翻转学习是一种在面对面学习之前使用在线材料进行核心教学的方法,应用从在线材料中获得的知识。医学三年级本科生模块的核心教学是基于一周的课程,包括32小时的讲座。反馈表明,学生参与度低,出勤率低。目的制定和评估医学生使用翻转学习的学习计划。方法对核心讲座进行录像,建议学生上午在家在线观看,下午进行基于案例的互动讨论。在交付变更前后进行了反馈;评估Likert量表反馈的变化。对自由文本反馈进行了专题评估。在分娩变更前后对课程评估检查结果进行比较。结果学生反馈显示,与标准讲座相比,翻转学习的满意度在分数和自由文本反馈方面都有显著提高。两种交付方式的课程评估结果没有变化。结论翻转学习可以提高学生对教学的满意度和参与度,但我们的研究尚未表明评估分数有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信