Perspectives for Medical Research in the Next Decade

N. Mudgalkar
{"title":"Perspectives for Medical Research in the Next Decade","authors":"N. Mudgalkar","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1002.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perspec ves in medical research has completed ten glorious as a journal this year. The journey was difficult yet very dynamic. The problems for medical journals are enormous. Right from receiving standardmanuscripts which have strong scien fic message, to the proper peer review for ar cles every step was difficult. Ins tu onal Ethics commi ee approval and clinical trial approval for studies was not universal and was not asked regularly for medical journal. Peer review process was not robust and was not objec ve. The CONSORT checklist was not being followed for every ar cle and hence ar cle standard is compromised. The non-availability of technical staff was again an issue.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1002.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perspec ves in medical research has completed ten glorious as a journal this year. The journey was difficult yet very dynamic. The problems for medical journals are enormous. Right from receiving standardmanuscripts which have strong scien fic message, to the proper peer review for ar cles every step was difficult. Ins tu onal Ethics commi ee approval and clinical trial approval for studies was not universal and was not asked regularly for medical journal. Peer review process was not robust and was not objec ve. The CONSORT checklist was not being followed for every ar cle and hence ar cle standard is compromised. The non-availability of technical staff was again an issue.
未来十年医学研究展望
《医学研究透视》今年创刊了十期。这次旅行很艰难,但很有活力。医学期刊面临的问题是巨大的。从收到具有强烈科学信息的标准稿件,到对文章进行适当的同行评审,每一步都很困难。国家伦理委员会对研究的批准和临床试验的批准并不普遍,也没有定期要求医学杂志。同行评议过程不健全,不客观。CONSORT检查表并没有被每个项目所遵循,因此一个项目的标准受到了损害。没有技术人员也是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信