Assessment of high-dose inhalational corticosteroids vs systemic corticosteroids in acute exacerbations of COPD in diabetic patients

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
A. Magdy, Haytham S. Diab
{"title":"Assessment of high-dose inhalational corticosteroids vs systemic corticosteroids in acute exacerbations of COPD in diabetic patients","authors":"A. Magdy, Haytham S. Diab","doi":"10.4103/ejb.ejb_71_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are effective in the management of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, they are not without adverse effects, especially hyperglycemia. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) showed satisfactory outcomes with good safety. These benefits were not evaluated in patients with AECOPD with diabetes mellitus. The aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of high dose of ICS vs SCS in the treatment of AECOPD in diabetic patients. Patients and methods A total of 126 patients with AECOPD were screened, and thirty of them were found to be eligible and were enrolled into two groups: group 1 (n=15) received 1 mg budesonide by jet nebulizer four times daily, and group 2 (n=15) received 40 mg prednisolone or equivalent systemically. Postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) of predicted was measured at day 1 and day 7, and random blood sugar (RBG) was measured twice daily in all patients. Results There was a significant increase in the mean FEV1 at day 7 as compared with mean FEV1 at day 1 in groups 1 and 2, with the increase in mean FEV1 being 19.6 and 21% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a significant difference, with higher mean RBG in group 2 when compared with group 1, at day 4 of treatment and continued onward. Interestingly, there was a significant elevation in mean RBG among patients in group 2 (SCS) starting by day 3 of treatment and continued onward, with no significant rise in the first two days, although there was no evident effect of ICS on the mean RBG among patients in group 1 (ICS) during the follow-up days. Conclusion Both ICS and SCS improve airflow in patients with AECOPD, taking into consideration the existence of diabetes mellitus. ICS may be an excellent substitute to SCS in the treatment of AECOPD in diabetic patients.","PeriodicalId":34128,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_71_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are effective in the management of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, they are not without adverse effects, especially hyperglycemia. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) showed satisfactory outcomes with good safety. These benefits were not evaluated in patients with AECOPD with diabetes mellitus. The aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of high dose of ICS vs SCS in the treatment of AECOPD in diabetic patients. Patients and methods A total of 126 patients with AECOPD were screened, and thirty of them were found to be eligible and were enrolled into two groups: group 1 (n=15) received 1 mg budesonide by jet nebulizer four times daily, and group 2 (n=15) received 40 mg prednisolone or equivalent systemically. Postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) of predicted was measured at day 1 and day 7, and random blood sugar (RBG) was measured twice daily in all patients. Results There was a significant increase in the mean FEV1 at day 7 as compared with mean FEV1 at day 1 in groups 1 and 2, with the increase in mean FEV1 being 19.6 and 21% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a significant difference, with higher mean RBG in group 2 when compared with group 1, at day 4 of treatment and continued onward. Interestingly, there was a significant elevation in mean RBG among patients in group 2 (SCS) starting by day 3 of treatment and continued onward, with no significant rise in the first two days, although there was no evident effect of ICS on the mean RBG among patients in group 1 (ICS) during the follow-up days. Conclusion Both ICS and SCS improve airflow in patients with AECOPD, taking into consideration the existence of diabetes mellitus. ICS may be an excellent substitute to SCS in the treatment of AECOPD in diabetic patients.
糖尿病患者COPD急性加重期大剂量吸入性皮质类固醇与全身性皮质类固醇的评估
背景:全身性皮质类固醇(SCS)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重期的治疗中是有效的。然而,它们并非没有副作用,尤其是高血糖。吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)疗效满意,安全性好。这些益处未在AECOPD合并糖尿病患者中进行评估。目的是比较高剂量ICS与SCS治疗糖尿病AECOPD的疗效和安全性。患者和方法共筛选126例AECOPD患者,其中30例符合条件,分为两组:1组(n=15)接受1 mg布地奈德喷射雾剂治疗,每日4次;2组(n=15)接受40 mg强的松龙或同等药物治疗。在第1天和第7天测量预测的支气管扩张剂后1 s用力呼气量(FEV1%),并每天测量2次随机血糖(RBG)。结果第1、2组患者第7天平均FEV1较第1天平均FEV1显著升高,第1、2组患者平均FEV1分别升高19.6%、21%。在治疗的第4天,与第1组相比,第2组的平均RBG更高,并且持续下去。有趣的是,从治疗第3天开始,第2组(SCS)患者的平均RBG显著升高,并持续下去,前两天没有显著升高,尽管在随访期间,ICS对第1组(ICS)患者的平均RBG没有明显影响。结论考虑到糖尿病的存在,ICS和SCS均能改善AECOPD患者的气流。在糖尿病AECOPD的治疗中,ICS可能是SCS的良好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信