Explaining the Adoption of Care Policies in Costa Rica and Uruguay: A Multiple Streams Approach

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Social Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI:10.1093/sp/jxac030
Diana Leon‐Espinoza
{"title":"Explaining the Adoption of Care Policies in Costa Rica and Uruguay: A Multiple Streams Approach","authors":"Diana Leon‐Espinoza","doi":"10.1093/sp/jxac030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article aims to reveal how Costa Rica and Uruguay succeeded in adopting integrated care policies. By adapting the classic “multiple streams approach,” I analyze the processes leading to the adoption of two care policies in Costa Rica and Uruguay. The findings suggest that the key to understanding the adoption of care policies lies within the interplay between agents and contexts in different streams. Problems can be constructed as a top-down process by a women’s agency or as a bottom-up process from a feminist organization. Solutions can be designed in close-knit policy networks of technocrats/bureaucrats or in open policy networks of bureaucrats and civil society organizations. Care policies become prominent items on government agendas in the presence of programmatic political parties and high electoral competition settings that prioritize the issue to attract voters or consolidate support. The alignment of problems, solutions, and politics identify different pathways that lead to the adoption of care policies.","PeriodicalId":47441,"journal":{"name":"Social Politics","volume":"29 1","pages":"1379 - 1402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article aims to reveal how Costa Rica and Uruguay succeeded in adopting integrated care policies. By adapting the classic “multiple streams approach,” I analyze the processes leading to the adoption of two care policies in Costa Rica and Uruguay. The findings suggest that the key to understanding the adoption of care policies lies within the interplay between agents and contexts in different streams. Problems can be constructed as a top-down process by a women’s agency or as a bottom-up process from a feminist organization. Solutions can be designed in close-knit policy networks of technocrats/bureaucrats or in open policy networks of bureaucrats and civil society organizations. Care policies become prominent items on government agendas in the presence of programmatic political parties and high electoral competition settings that prioritize the issue to attract voters or consolidate support. The alignment of problems, solutions, and politics identify different pathways that lead to the adoption of care policies.
解释哥斯达黎加和乌拉圭护理政策的采用:多流方法
摘要:本文旨在揭示哥斯达黎加和乌拉圭是如何成功地采取综合护理政策的。通过采用经典的“多流方法”,我分析了哥斯达黎加和乌拉圭采取两项护理政策的过程。研究结果表明,理解护理政策采用的关键在于不同流中的因素和环境之间的相互作用。问题可以由妇女机构构建为自上而下的过程,也可以由女权主义组织构建为自下而上的过程。可以在技术官僚/官僚的紧密政策网络中或在官僚和民间社会组织的开放政策网络中设计解决方案。在纲领性政党和高度竞争的选举环境中,照顾政策成为政府议程上的突出项目,这些政党优先考虑这个问题以吸引选民或巩固支持。问题、解决方案和政治的一致性确定了导致采取护理政策的不同途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Politics
Social Politics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Social Politics is the journal for incisive analyses of gender, politics and policy across the globe. It takes on the critical emerging issues of our age: globalization, transnationality and citizenship, migration, diversity and its intersections, the restructuring of capitalisms and states. We engage with feminist theoretical issues and with theories of welfare regimes, "varieties of capitalism," the ideational and cultural turns in social science, governmentality and postcolonialism. We are looking for articles that engage in this exciting mix of debates that will be of interest to our multidisciplinary and international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信