Tolstoy’s War and Peace: Philosophy of History Defamiliarized

IF 0.4 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.1163/18722636-12341461

H. Kellner

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tolstoy’s War and Peace asserts an opposition to the discourse of philosophy of history and of any theorizing of human life because of the complexity of events, the possibilities not realized, and the insignificance of our moment in time and space. Without that sort of consideration of the possibility that human events cannot be theorized, explained, correctly narrated, or anticipated, we may miss our chance to cast off the burden of philosophy of history (in the interest of life), or at least to perceive that it is a burden.

查看原文本刊更多论文

托尔斯泰的《战争与和平:陌生化的历史哲学》

托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》主张反对历史哲学话语和任何人类生活理论，因为事件的复杂性、未实现的可能性以及我们在时间和空间中的渺小。如果不考虑人类事件无法被理论化、解释、正确叙述或预测的可能性，我们可能会错过摆脱历史哲学负担的机会（为了生活的利益），或者至少会认为这是一种负担。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the Philosophy of History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy of history is a rapidly expanding area. There is growing interest today in: what constitutes knowledge of the past, the ontology of past events, the relationship of language to the past, and the nature of representations of the past. These interests are distinct from – although connected with – contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, metaphysics, philosophy of language, and aesthetics. Hence we need a distinct venue in which philosophers can explore these issues. Journal of the Philosophy of History provides such a venue. Ever since neo-Kantianism, philosophy of history has been central to all of philosophy, whether or not particular philosophers recognized its potential significance.