Simon Roques , Lisanne Koning , Johan van Riel , Alex Bossers , Dirkjan Schokker , Soumya Kanti Kar , Léon Sebek
{"title":"Influence of agroecology practices on rumen microbiota associated with methane emission in dairy cattle","authors":"Simon Roques , Lisanne Koning , Johan van Riel , Alex Bossers , Dirkjan Schokker , Soumya Kanti Kar , Léon Sebek","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Moving from intensive farming to agroecology to support farm sustainability means changing feeding practices. In practical terms, this means increasing the botanical diversity and delaying mowing of the grasslands to favor fauna diversity and associated ecosystem services. However, it is unknown whether these feeding practices alter rumen microbiota and its association with methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission, a potent greenhouse gas. The objective of this study was to assess CH<sub>4</sub> emission and rumen microbiota of several dairy breeds fed agroecology diets. Three dairy cattle breeds (Holstein Friesian, Groninger Blaarkop and Jersey) (N = 10 for each breed) were fed three grass silage-based diets that included a proportion of a control silage, an experimental silage composed of late mown grass, and an experimental silage composed of diverse botanical species. Cows were fed for 13 weeks with gradual adjustment of the proportion of each silage. Rumen fluid was sampled during the weeks that corresponded to the highest proportion of each silage in the diet. Rumen microbiota was characterized through 16 s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for its richness and diversity, as well as its compositions according to diet type and breed. Production performances and CH<sub>4</sub> emission were also measured. Methane production (g/d) was similar between the control and the agroecological diets. Cows fed the experimental diets had a different rumen microbiota composition than cows fed control diet. The cows fed the agroecological diets presented reduced relative abundances of <em>Rumminoccocaeae</em>, and higher relative abundances of <em>Chirstensenellaceae</em> and <em>Methanobrevibacter</em> than cows fed the control diet. Besides, the cows fed the agroecological diets presented a richer (<em>P</em> < 0.01) and more diverse (<em>P</em> < 0.01) rumen microbiota. Overall, this study highlights how feeding practices that comply with agroecology principles, and applied under practical conditions, shaped the rumen microbiota of specialized and dual-purpose cattle breeds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 115716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840123001505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Moving from intensive farming to agroecology to support farm sustainability means changing feeding practices. In practical terms, this means increasing the botanical diversity and delaying mowing of the grasslands to favor fauna diversity and associated ecosystem services. However, it is unknown whether these feeding practices alter rumen microbiota and its association with methane (CH4) emission, a potent greenhouse gas. The objective of this study was to assess CH4 emission and rumen microbiota of several dairy breeds fed agroecology diets. Three dairy cattle breeds (Holstein Friesian, Groninger Blaarkop and Jersey) (N = 10 for each breed) were fed three grass silage-based diets that included a proportion of a control silage, an experimental silage composed of late mown grass, and an experimental silage composed of diverse botanical species. Cows were fed for 13 weeks with gradual adjustment of the proportion of each silage. Rumen fluid was sampled during the weeks that corresponded to the highest proportion of each silage in the diet. Rumen microbiota was characterized through 16 s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for its richness and diversity, as well as its compositions according to diet type and breed. Production performances and CH4 emission were also measured. Methane production (g/d) was similar between the control and the agroecological diets. Cows fed the experimental diets had a different rumen microbiota composition than cows fed control diet. The cows fed the agroecological diets presented reduced relative abundances of Rumminoccocaeae, and higher relative abundances of Chirstensenellaceae and Methanobrevibacter than cows fed the control diet. Besides, the cows fed the agroecological diets presented a richer (P < 0.01) and more diverse (P < 0.01) rumen microbiota. Overall, this study highlights how feeding practices that comply with agroecology principles, and applied under practical conditions, shaped the rumen microbiota of specialized and dual-purpose cattle breeds.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.