The effectiveness of methods to diagnose eimeriosis in turkeys on industrial farms and the species identification

E. Chalysheva, R. Safiullin
{"title":"The effectiveness of methods to diagnose eimeriosis in turkeys on industrial farms and the species identification","authors":"E. Chalysheva, R. Safiullin","doi":"10.31016/1998-8435-2022-16-3-274-281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of methods to diagnose eimeriosis in turkeys and the species identification.Materials and methods. A comparative effectiveness assessment of life-time diagnostic methods for eimeriosis in turkey poults was conducted using coproscopic examinations: with sodium chloride alone, and with sodium chloride and glycerin according to Darling; with sodium chloride and glucose according to McMaster; and with sodium chloride alone according to Fülleborn. The diagnostic strength of different methods was evaluated with Eimeria oocysts artificially placed in standard litter samples free from infection. Morphological examinations and characteristics determination of Eimeria species in the turkey poults were conducted in the laboratory after the completed sporulation.Results and discussion. The diagnostic strength of the Fülleborn’s flotation method for turkey eimeriosis was 62.4%, 79.2% for the combined Darling1 methods, 85.6% for the combined Darling2 methods, and 90.4% for the McMaster’s methods. The combined Darling’s and McMaster’s methods used by us provide, according to their technology, for double centrifugation: water settling and flotation with saline, thus the microscopically examined sample contained not so many feed residues or other particles, which affected the diagnostic strength of the method. The young turkeys from the Penza and Moscow Regions’ farms were found to have the following types of Eimeria: Eimeria meleagrimitis in 62–80%, E. meleagridis in 15–16%, E. adenoides in 5–13%, and E. gallopavonis in 9%. E. meleagrimitis and E. meleagridis dominated on the turkey farms in the said regions. E. adenoides and E. gallopavonis were significantly less common.","PeriodicalId":34353,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii parazitologicheskii zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii parazitologicheskii zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2022-16-3-274-281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the research is a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of methods to diagnose eimeriosis in turkeys and the species identification.Materials and methods. A comparative effectiveness assessment of life-time diagnostic methods for eimeriosis in turkey poults was conducted using coproscopic examinations: with sodium chloride alone, and with sodium chloride and glycerin according to Darling; with sodium chloride and glucose according to McMaster; and with sodium chloride alone according to Fülleborn. The diagnostic strength of different methods was evaluated with Eimeria oocysts artificially placed in standard litter samples free from infection. Morphological examinations and characteristics determination of Eimeria species in the turkey poults were conducted in the laboratory after the completed sporulation.Results and discussion. The diagnostic strength of the Fülleborn’s flotation method for turkey eimeriosis was 62.4%, 79.2% for the combined Darling1 methods, 85.6% for the combined Darling2 methods, and 90.4% for the McMaster’s methods. The combined Darling’s and McMaster’s methods used by us provide, according to their technology, for double centrifugation: water settling and flotation with saline, thus the microscopically examined sample contained not so many feed residues or other particles, which affected the diagnostic strength of the method. The young turkeys from the Penza and Moscow Regions’ farms were found to have the following types of Eimeria: Eimeria meleagrimitis in 62–80%, E. meleagridis in 15–16%, E. adenoides in 5–13%, and E. gallopavonis in 9%. E. meleagrimitis and E. meleagridis dominated on the turkey farms in the said regions. E. adenoides and E. gallopavonis were significantly less common.
工业化养殖场火鸡球虫病诊断方法的有效性及品种鉴定
本研究的目的是比较评估诊断火鸡艾美拉虫病的方法和物种鉴定的有效性。材料和方法。使用阴道镜检查对火鸡雏鸡艾美耳虫病的终生诊断方法进行了比较有效性评估:单独使用氯化钠,根据达林的说法,使用氯化钠和甘油;根据麦克马斯特的说法,用氯化钠和葡萄糖;根据莱伯恩的说法,只能使用氯化钠。用人工将艾美耳球虫卵囊置于未受感染的标准窝样中,评价不同方法的诊断强度。产孢完成后,在实验室对雏鸡艾美耳球虫进行形态学检查和特征测定。结果和讨论。 lleborn浮选法对火鸡艾美耳虫病的诊断率为62.4%,联合达林1法为79.2%,联合达林2法为85.6%,麦克马斯特法为90.4%。我们使用的达令和麦克马斯特联合方法,根据他们的技术,提供了双重离心:水沉淀和盐水浮选,因此显微镜下检查的样品中没有那么多的饲料残留物或其他颗粒,这影响了方法的诊断强度。奔萨州和莫斯科州农场的雏火鸡被发现有以下几种艾美耳虫:肉鸡艾美耳虫占62% - 80%,肉鸡艾美耳虫占15% - 16%,腺状艾美耳虫占5-13%,加洛帕沃尼艾美耳虫占9%。在上述地区的火鸡养殖场中,以肉鸡肉鸡绦虫和肉鸡肉鸡绦虫为主。腺状囊绦虫和gallopavonis明显较少见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信