El Códice de Dresde como documento del Posclásico Tardío: análisis visual en el desarrollo del concepto

IF 0.3 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
Merideth Paxton
{"title":"El Códice de Dresde como documento del Posclásico Tardío: análisis visual en el desarrollo del concepto","authors":"Merideth Paxton","doi":"10.19130/iifl.ecm.59.22x874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research to determine the pre-Hispanic context of the Dresden Codex argues that it is Late Postclassic (1250 AD-Spanish conquest) and that it is not necessarily from the area of Chichen Itza. The conclusions modify the view of J. Eric S. Thompson, still highly influential after nearly fifty years, that it was painted in or near the settlement between 1200 and 1250 AD. Because the manuscript is a copy from Classic period sources, it is necessary to establish its date according to the most recent revision. This can be determined from a group of objects in the illustrations that are closely linked with Late Postclassic art. The study further supports interpretation of the period in neutral terms, not decadence.","PeriodicalId":43489,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Cultura Maya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Cultura Maya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.59.22x874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research to determine the pre-Hispanic context of the Dresden Codex argues that it is Late Postclassic (1250 AD-Spanish conquest) and that it is not necessarily from the area of Chichen Itza. The conclusions modify the view of J. Eric S. Thompson, still highly influential after nearly fifty years, that it was painted in or near the settlement between 1200 and 1250 AD. Because the manuscript is a copy from Classic period sources, it is necessary to establish its date according to the most recent revision. This can be determined from a group of objects in the illustrations that are closely linked with Late Postclassic art. The study further supports interpretation of the period in neutral terms, not decadence.
德累斯顿法典作为后古典主义晚期的文件:概念发展中的视觉分析
这项确定德累斯顿手抄本的前西班牙语境的研究认为,它是后古典晚期(公元1250年西班牙征服),它不一定来自奇琴伊察地区。这些结论修正了j·埃里克·s·汤普森的观点,他认为这幅画是在公元1200年到1250年之间的定居点或附近绘制的,在近五十年后仍然很有影响力。由于手稿是古典时期的副本,因此有必要根据最近的修订确定其日期。这可以从插图中的一组与后期后古典艺术密切相关的对象中确定。这项研究进一步支持了对这一时期的中性解释,而不是颓废。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Estudios de Cultura Maya
Estudios de Cultura Maya ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信