Quantification of training and match-load distribution across a season in elite English Premier League soccer players

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
David M. Kelly, A. Strudwick, G. Atkinson, B. Drust, W. Gregson
{"title":"Quantification of training and match-load distribution across a season in elite English Premier League soccer players","authors":"David M. Kelly, A. Strudwick, G. Atkinson, B. Drust, W. Gregson","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2019.1651934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To examine training and match loads undertaken by soccer players competing in the English Premier League. Methods: Using a retrospective design, external (GPS) and internal training loads (sessions ratings of perceived exertion [sRPE-TL]) were examined in 26 players across the competition phase of the 2012–2013 English Premier League season. Within-subject linear mixed-models estimated the mean effects (95% confidence interval [CI]) for load data across 6-week mesocycles and 1-week microcycles. Results: Daily sRPE-TL (95% CI range, 15 to 111 AU) and total distance (95% CI range, 179 to 949 AU) were higher during the early stages (mesocycle 1 and 2) of the competition period. Overall, high-speed activity was similar between mesocycles. Across the training week, load was greater on match day and lower pre match-day (G-1) vs. all other days, respectively (p < 0.001). sRPE-TL (~70–90 AU per day) and total distance (~700–800 m per day) progressively declined over the 3 days before a match (p < 0.001). High-speed distance was greater 3 days (G-3) before a game vs. G-1 (95% CI, 140 to 336 m) while very high-speed distance was greater on G-3 and G-2 than G-1 (95% CI range, 8 to 62 m; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Periodisation of in-season training load is mainly evident across the weekly microcycle reflecting the recovery and preparation for matches.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"4 1","pages":"59 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2019.1651934","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2019.1651934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To examine training and match loads undertaken by soccer players competing in the English Premier League. Methods: Using a retrospective design, external (GPS) and internal training loads (sessions ratings of perceived exertion [sRPE-TL]) were examined in 26 players across the competition phase of the 2012–2013 English Premier League season. Within-subject linear mixed-models estimated the mean effects (95% confidence interval [CI]) for load data across 6-week mesocycles and 1-week microcycles. Results: Daily sRPE-TL (95% CI range, 15 to 111 AU) and total distance (95% CI range, 179 to 949 AU) were higher during the early stages (mesocycle 1 and 2) of the competition period. Overall, high-speed activity was similar between mesocycles. Across the training week, load was greater on match day and lower pre match-day (G-1) vs. all other days, respectively (p < 0.001). sRPE-TL (~70–90 AU per day) and total distance (~700–800 m per day) progressively declined over the 3 days before a match (p < 0.001). High-speed distance was greater 3 days (G-3) before a game vs. G-1 (95% CI, 140 to 336 m) while very high-speed distance was greater on G-3 and G-2 than G-1 (95% CI range, 8 to 62 m; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Periodisation of in-season training load is mainly evident across the weekly microcycle reflecting the recovery and preparation for matches.
英格兰足球超级联赛精英球员一个赛季训练和比赛负荷分布的量化
摘要目的:考察参加英超联赛的足球运动员的训练和比赛负荷。方法:采用回顾性设计,在2012-2013赛季英超联赛的比赛阶段,对26名球员的外部(GPS)和内部训练负荷(感知用力的会话评分[sRPE TL])进行了检查。受试者内线性混合模型估计了6周中周期和1周微周期负荷数据的平均效应(95%置信区间[CI])。结果:在竞赛期的早期阶段(中周期1和2),日sRPE TL(95%CI范围,15至111 AU)和总距离(95%CI区间,179至949 AU)较高。总的来说,中周期之间的高速活动是相似的。在整个训练周中,与其他所有日子相比,比赛日的负荷更大,赛前负荷更低(G-1)(p<0.001)。sRPE TL(每天约70–90 AU)和总距离(每天约700–800 m)在比赛前的3天内逐渐下降(p<001)。比赛前3天(G-3)的高速距离比其他日子大。G-1(95%CI,140至336米),而G-3和G-2的高速距离大于G-1(95%CI范围,8至62米;p<0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信