Professional Networks of Special Educators and Speech-Language Pathologists Working With Students Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
E. E. Biggs, J. Bumble, Rebecca E. Hacker
{"title":"Professional Networks of Special Educators and Speech-Language Pathologists Working With Students Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication","authors":"E. E. Biggs, J. Bumble, Rebecca E. Hacker","doi":"10.1177/07419325221128497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supporting students with complex communication needs requires collaboration within and beyond the school system. Through a state-wide survey, this quantitative descriptive study used social network analysis to examine the professional networks and collaboration patterns of 325 special education teachers and 189 speech-language pathologists who worked with students with complex communication needs. Findings revealed wide variability in network size and function across these educators. Information is reported about collaborative partners, frequency of communication, perceptions of trust, and exchange of supports across relationships (i.e., informational, tangible, emotional supports). Teachers and speech-language pathologists who worked with students with access to high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) had larger professional networks than those whose students only used unaided AAC (e.g., gestures, signs) or low-tech AAC such as picture symbols. This research provides an important first look at AAC-related professional networks and collaboration patterns within these networks to inform future research and practice.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"351 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221128497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supporting students with complex communication needs requires collaboration within and beyond the school system. Through a state-wide survey, this quantitative descriptive study used social network analysis to examine the professional networks and collaboration patterns of 325 special education teachers and 189 speech-language pathologists who worked with students with complex communication needs. Findings revealed wide variability in network size and function across these educators. Information is reported about collaborative partners, frequency of communication, perceptions of trust, and exchange of supports across relationships (i.e., informational, tangible, emotional supports). Teachers and speech-language pathologists who worked with students with access to high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) had larger professional networks than those whose students only used unaided AAC (e.g., gestures, signs) or low-tech AAC such as picture symbols. This research provides an important first look at AAC-related professional networks and collaboration patterns within these networks to inform future research and practice.
特殊教育工作者和言语语言病理学家与使用增强和替代交流的学生合作的专业网络
支持有复杂沟通需求的学生需要学校系统内外的合作。通过全州范围的调查,这项定量描述性研究使用社会网络分析来检验325名特殊教育教师和189名言语语言病理学家的专业网络和合作模式,他们与有复杂沟通需求的学生合作。研究结果显示,这些教育工作者的网络规模和功能存在很大差异。报告的信息涉及合作伙伴、沟通频率、信任感以及跨关系的支持交流(即信息、有形、情感支持)。与那些学生只使用无辅助交流(如手势、手势)或低技术交流(如图片符号)的学生相比,与能够使用高科技增强和替代交流(AAC)的学生合作的教师和言语病理学家拥有更大的专业网络。这项研究首次对AAC相关的专业网络和这些网络中的合作模式进行了重要的研究,为未来的研究和实践提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Remedial and Special Education
Remedial and Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信