Clinical Decision Making: A Comparison Study between Greece and Slovakia

N. Bakalis
{"title":"Clinical Decision Making: A Comparison Study between Greece and Slovakia","authors":"N. Bakalis","doi":"10.31579/2690-4861/220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical decisions are a nurses' daily clinical practice skill that needs to be constantly evolving in order to provide quality patient care. Purpose: To investigate and compare the clinical decisions made by nurses in Greece and Slovakia. Materials and Methods: Q-methodology was used and eight modified scenarios were given to the nursing staff. Using power analysis, a total of 100 nurses that worked in public hospitals in Greece (nG = 50) and Slovakia (nS = 50) successfully completed the study. Results: In the scenarios with more medical interventions, Greek nurses showed higher scores in the scenarios of tachycardia, bradycardia and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In contrast, Slovak nurses scored higher individual scores in all four scenarios (anxiety - difficulty sleeping –dyspnea - vomiting) with more nursing interventions (p<0.05). Conclusions: Greek nurses overall had higher individual scores in the scenarios with more medical interventions, probably due to the medically-centered philosophy of nurses, the lack of protocols and autonomy to provide patient care.","PeriodicalId":93010,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical case reports and reviews : open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical case reports and reviews : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical decisions are a nurses' daily clinical practice skill that needs to be constantly evolving in order to provide quality patient care. Purpose: To investigate and compare the clinical decisions made by nurses in Greece and Slovakia. Materials and Methods: Q-methodology was used and eight modified scenarios were given to the nursing staff. Using power analysis, a total of 100 nurses that worked in public hospitals in Greece (nG = 50) and Slovakia (nS = 50) successfully completed the study. Results: In the scenarios with more medical interventions, Greek nurses showed higher scores in the scenarios of tachycardia, bradycardia and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In contrast, Slovak nurses scored higher individual scores in all four scenarios (anxiety - difficulty sleeping –dyspnea - vomiting) with more nursing interventions (p<0.05). Conclusions: Greek nurses overall had higher individual scores in the scenarios with more medical interventions, probably due to the medically-centered philosophy of nurses, the lack of protocols and autonomy to provide patient care.
临床决策:希腊和斯洛伐克的比较研究
背景:临床决策是护士的日常临床实践技能,需要不断发展才能提供高质量的患者护理。目的:调查和比较希腊和斯洛伐克护士的临床决策。材料与方法:采用Q方法,对护理人员进行8种改进方案。使用权力分析,希腊(nG=50)和斯洛伐克(nS=50)公立医院的100名护士成功完成了这项研究。结果:在有更多医疗干预的情况下,希腊护士在心动过速、心动过缓和心肺复苏方面的得分更高。相比之下,斯洛伐克护士在所有四种情况下(焦虑-睡眠困难-呼吸困难-呕吐)的个人得分都较高,护理干预次数较多(p<0.05)。结论:希腊护士在医疗干预次数较多的情况下总体得分较高,这可能是由于护士以医学为中心的理念,缺乏提供患者护理的协议和自主性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信