ESTRATEGIAS COGNITIVO-EMOCIONALES Y DENSIDAD ARGUMENTATIVA

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Cristian Noemi, Rosalía Iglesias
{"title":"ESTRATEGIAS COGNITIVO-EMOCIONALES Y DENSIDAD ARGUMENTATIVA","authors":"Cristian Noemi, Rosalía Iglesias","doi":"10.4067/S0718-48832019000100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl trabajo procura establecer si los modos con los que un sujeto se enfrenta cognitiva y emocionalmente con la realidad estan relacionados con su conducta linguistica expresada en terminos de densidad argumentativa. A fin de establecer cuales son las principales estrategias cognitivo-emocionales empleadas por los sujetos de la muestra, se empleo el test Moldes (Hernandez, 2010). Para evaluar la densidad discursiva argumentativa se utilizo el Dilema III del Cuestionario D.I.T. (Rest, 2013). El cruce de informacion entre ambos instrumentos permitio establecer que los sujetos de alto rendimiento en el test Moldes mostraron mayor grado de densidad discursiva y viceversa. Los resultados, igualmente, permitieron especificar los tipos de estrategias cognitivo-emocionales que se asocian con mayor o menor densidad discursiva argumentativa. EnglishThe work tries to establish whether the ways in which a subject is confronted cognitively and emotionally with reality are related to their linguistic behavior expressed in terms of argumentative density. In order to establish which are the main cognitive emotional strate gies used by the subjects of the sample, the Moldes test was used (Hernandez, 2010). To assess the argumentative discursive density, the Dilemma III of the Questionnaire D.I.T. (Rest, 2013) was used. The crossing of information between both instruments allowed to establish that the subjects of high performance in the Molds test showed a greater degree of discursive density and vice versa. The results also allowed us to specify the types of cognitive emotional strategies that are associated with greater or lesser argumentative discursive density","PeriodicalId":35168,"journal":{"name":"RLA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832019000100161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolEl trabajo procura establecer si los modos con los que un sujeto se enfrenta cognitiva y emocionalmente con la realidad estan relacionados con su conducta linguistica expresada en terminos de densidad argumentativa. A fin de establecer cuales son las principales estrategias cognitivo-emocionales empleadas por los sujetos de la muestra, se empleo el test Moldes (Hernandez, 2010). Para evaluar la densidad discursiva argumentativa se utilizo el Dilema III del Cuestionario D.I.T. (Rest, 2013). El cruce de informacion entre ambos instrumentos permitio establecer que los sujetos de alto rendimiento en el test Moldes mostraron mayor grado de densidad discursiva y viceversa. Los resultados, igualmente, permitieron especificar los tipos de estrategias cognitivo-emocionales que se asocian con mayor o menor densidad discursiva argumentativa. EnglishThe work tries to establish whether the ways in which a subject is confronted cognitively and emotionally with reality are related to their linguistic behavior expressed in terms of argumentative density. In order to establish which are the main cognitive emotional strate gies used by the subjects of the sample, the Moldes test was used (Hernandez, 2010). To assess the argumentative discursive density, the Dilemma III of the Questionnaire D.I.T. (Rest, 2013) was used. The crossing of information between both instruments allowed to establish that the subjects of high performance in the Molds test showed a greater degree of discursive density and vice versa. The results also allowed us to specify the types of cognitive emotional strategies that are associated with greater or lesser argumentative discursive density
认知-情感策略和论证密度
西班牙的工作试图确定一个人在认知和情感上面对现实的方式是否与他或她的语言行为有关,这些行为以论证密度的形式表达。为了确定样本受试者使用的主要认知-情感策略是什么,使用了模型测试(埃尔南德斯,2010年)。使用D.I.T.(REST,2013年)问卷中的困境三来评估论点话语密度。这两种仪器之间的信息交叉表明,在测试模具中表现出色的受试者表现出更高的话语密度,反之亦然。研究结果还确定了与或多或少的论证话语密度相关的认知-情感策略类型。英语这项工作试图确定一个主题在认知和情感上与现实面对的方式是否与他们在论证密度方面所表达的语言行为有关。为了确定样本对象使用的主要认知情感策略是什么,使用了模子测试(埃尔南德斯,2010年)。为了评估论点话语密度,使用了D.I.T.(REST,2013年)问卷的困境三。这两种仪器之间的信息交叉表明,模具测试中的高性能主题显示出更高的话语密度,反之亦然。这些结果还使我们能够具体说明与较高或较低议论文密度相关的认知情感策略类型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RLA
RLA Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信