Etika Tasawuf Guru: Studi Pemikiran Imam al-Ghazali dan Syekh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi

Akh Syaiful Rijal, L. Hakim
{"title":"Etika Tasawuf Guru: Studi Pemikiran Imam al-Ghazali dan Syekh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi","authors":"Akh Syaiful Rijal, L. Hakim","doi":"10.19105/tjpi.v16i1.4351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims: (1) to identify how the ethics of teacher Sufism according to Imam al-Ghazali and Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi; and (2) To find out how the teacher's Sufism ethical thinking compared between the two. This research method includes the type of library research. The main data sources are the book Ihya 'Ulumiddin, Ayyuhal Walad by Imam al-Ghazali, and the book Tanwirul Qulub by Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi. The analysis uses content analysis and comparison methods. As a result, the ethics of teachers from the Sufism perspective according to Imam al-Ghazali and Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi are in the form of ethical-religious so that the ethics of teachers are more directed at the Sufism behavior of a mursyid to his students. Second, the similarity of the teacher’ ethic based on Sufism perspective according to Imam al-Ghazali and Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi is that the teacher must be care to their students and know their students’ intellectual competence. The difference, Imam al-Ghazali recommends that the teachers guide their students to be real human through an exemplary approach. Meanwhile, Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi also emphasized compassion in interacting with students, but in internalizing values it ​​uses a verbal approach, namely giving advice. \n ","PeriodicalId":32034,"journal":{"name":"Tadris Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tadris Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v16i1.4351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims: (1) to identify how the ethics of teacher Sufism according to Imam al-Ghazali and Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi; and (2) To find out how the teacher's Sufism ethical thinking compared between the two. This research method includes the type of library research. The main data sources are the book Ihya 'Ulumiddin, Ayyuhal Walad by Imam al-Ghazali, and the book Tanwirul Qulub by Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi. The analysis uses content analysis and comparison methods. As a result, the ethics of teachers from the Sufism perspective according to Imam al-Ghazali and Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi are in the form of ethical-religious so that the ethics of teachers are more directed at the Sufism behavior of a mursyid to his students. Second, the similarity of the teacher’ ethic based on Sufism perspective according to Imam al-Ghazali and Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi is that the teacher must be care to their students and know their students’ intellectual competence. The difference, Imam al-Ghazali recommends that the teachers guide their students to be real human through an exemplary approach. Meanwhile, Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi also emphasized compassion in interacting with students, but in internalizing values it ​​uses a verbal approach, namely giving advice.  
本研究的目的是:(1)从伊玛目加扎利和谢赫·穆罕默德·阿明·库尔迪的角度来确定苏菲派教师的道德观;(2)教师苏菲主义伦理思想与苏伦理思想的比较。这种研究方法包括图书馆研究的类型。主要数据来源是伊玛目加扎利的《Ihya’Ulumiddin,Ayyuhal Walad》一书和谢赫·穆罕默德·阿明·库尔迪的《Tanwirul Qulub》一书。分析采用内容分析和比较的方法。因此,根据Imam al-Ghazali和Sheikh Muhammad Amin al-Kurdi的观点,从苏菲主义的角度来看,教师的道德是以伦理宗教的形式存在的,因此教师的道德更多地针对穆尔希德对学生的苏菲主义行为。其次,根据伊玛目加扎利和谢赫·穆罕默德·阿明·库尔迪的观点,基于苏菲主义视角的教师伦理的相似之处在于,教师必须关心学生,了解学生的智力能力。不同的是,伊玛目加扎利建议老师们通过榜样的方式引导学生成为真正的人。与此同时,谢赫·穆罕默德·阿明·库尔迪在与学生互动时也强调同情心,但在内化价值观时​​使用口头方法,即提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信