Flavoromics approach in monitoring changes of aroma profiles in rapeseed oils with different fragrance styles caused by frying and heating processes

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学
Fei Guo, Peng-Huan Wang, Yang Li, Qiuju Bian, Miao Yu, Wenhui Hou, Xiaoxia Su, Jihong Wu
{"title":"Flavoromics approach in monitoring changes of aroma profiles in rapeseed oils with different fragrance styles caused by frying and heating processes","authors":"Fei Guo, Peng-Huan Wang, Yang Li, Qiuju Bian, Miao Yu, Wenhui Hou, Xiaoxia Su, Jihong Wu","doi":"10.1515/ijfe-2023-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, four typical fragrance types of rapeseed oils were investigated under short-term frying of French fries and heating processes. Volatile flavor profiles, aroma compounds, and sensory attributes were evaluated by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), gas chromatography–olfactory (GC-O), and sensory evaluation. The examination showed 140 volatiles, 28 aroma compounds, as well as 8 sensory attributes were detected. Aldehydes, nitriles, and acids were principal groups in unheated delicate fragrance rapeseed oil (DFRO) and refined rapeseed oil (RRO), as well as nitriles, acids, and heterocycles in unheated strong fragrance rapeseed oil (SFRO) and umami fragrance rapeseed oil (UFRO). During heating process, the total amount of volatiles had significant increases in DFRO and RRO, whereas it was the opposite in SFRO and UFRO. Aldehyde became the most predominant group, with significant increases under thermal treatments. Compared with heated oils, most volatiles presented lower contents in fried oils. Among the volatiles, 24 compounds were formed during heating process and 6 compounds were detected solely in fried oils. Among 8 sensory attributes, the deep-fried flavor attribute was formed in thermal-treated oils. According to the statistical analysis, remarkable differences were observed among unheated and thermal-treated samples, and the differences were diminished under thermal treatments, especially frying process; however, fried SFRO and DFRO still showed obvious distinctions with the others in flavor profiles.","PeriodicalId":13976,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2023-0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this study, four typical fragrance types of rapeseed oils were investigated under short-term frying of French fries and heating processes. Volatile flavor profiles, aroma compounds, and sensory attributes were evaluated by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), gas chromatography–olfactory (GC-O), and sensory evaluation. The examination showed 140 volatiles, 28 aroma compounds, as well as 8 sensory attributes were detected. Aldehydes, nitriles, and acids were principal groups in unheated delicate fragrance rapeseed oil (DFRO) and refined rapeseed oil (RRO), as well as nitriles, acids, and heterocycles in unheated strong fragrance rapeseed oil (SFRO) and umami fragrance rapeseed oil (UFRO). During heating process, the total amount of volatiles had significant increases in DFRO and RRO, whereas it was the opposite in SFRO and UFRO. Aldehyde became the most predominant group, with significant increases under thermal treatments. Compared with heated oils, most volatiles presented lower contents in fried oils. Among the volatiles, 24 compounds were formed during heating process and 6 compounds were detected solely in fried oils. Among 8 sensory attributes, the deep-fried flavor attribute was formed in thermal-treated oils. According to the statistical analysis, remarkable differences were observed among unheated and thermal-treated samples, and the differences were diminished under thermal treatments, especially frying process; however, fried SFRO and DFRO still showed obvious distinctions with the others in flavor profiles.
风味测定法监测不同香味类型菜籽油在油炸和加热过程中的香气变化
摘要在炸薯条的短期油炸和加热过程中,研究了四种典型的菜籽油香味类型。通过气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)、气相色谱法-嗅觉法(GC-O)和感官评估来评估挥发性风味、香气化合物和感官属性。检测结果表明,共检出挥发物140种,香气成分28种,感官性状8种。未加热的清香型菜籽油(DFRO)和精制菜籽油(RRO)中的醛、腈和酸是主要基团,未加热的浓香型菜籽油(SFRO)和鲜味型菜籽油(UFRO)中的腈、酸和杂环也是主要基团。在加热过程中,DFRO和RRO的挥发物总量显著增加,而SFRO和UFRO则相反。醛成为最主要的基团,在热处理下显著增加。与热油相比,大多数挥发物在煎炸油中的含量较低。在挥发物中,有24种化合物是在加热过程中形成的,6种化合物仅在煎炸油中检测到。在8种感官属性中,油炸风味属性是在热处理油中形成的。根据统计分析,未加热和热处理的样品之间存在显著差异,在热处理下,尤其是油炸过程中,差异有所减少;但油炸SFRO和DFRO在风味特征上仍有明显的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Food Engineering
International Journal of Food Engineering 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Food Engineering is devoted to engineering disciplines related to processing foods. The areas of interest include heat, mass transfer and fluid flow in food processing; food microstructure development and characterization; application of artificial intelligence in food engineering research and in industry; food biotechnology; and mathematical modeling and software development for food processing purposes. Authors and editors come from top engineering programs around the world: the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and Western Europe, but also South America, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信