Mosaic Nature of Dialogue in Academic Tutoring

Edyta Zawadzka
{"title":"Mosaic Nature of Dialogue in Academic Tutoring","authors":"Edyta Zawadzka","doi":"10.35765/hw.2022.2160.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to problematize and present the mosaic approach to the dimensions of dialogue in academic tutoring. \nTHE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The considerations carried out in the article are aimed at solving the following research problem: “what are the structure and specific features of the mosaic approach to dialogue in academic tutoring?”. The method used in the process of constructing the scientific argumentation is problematization of issues, based on literature and the author’s experience gained during the “Masters of Didactics” project. \nTHE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In order to answer the research question, first, tutoring was characterised as an exemplification of personalised education (learning), and then the author focused on the problematization of three dimensions of dialogue in academic tutoring. \nRESEARCH RESULTS: In the process of scientific analysis, three dimensions of dialogue were described (as a way of communication between the tutor and the tutee, a personal dialogue, and a motivational interviewing), showing the mosaic nature of dialogue in academic tutoring and the contribution of this process to the achievement of goals that complement one another. \nCONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS: In the mosaic approach to dialogue, each of its dimensions is important, and saturation of individual tutoring processes with them is conditioned by the factors corresponding to the personalization of education. Such an approach seems not only to legitimize and make varied tutoring practices more reflective, but it also inspires empirical research on the dimensions of dialogue at universities.","PeriodicalId":53094,"journal":{"name":"Horyzonty Wychowania","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horyzonty Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2022.2160.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to problematize and present the mosaic approach to the dimensions of dialogue in academic tutoring. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The considerations carried out in the article are aimed at solving the following research problem: “what are the structure and specific features of the mosaic approach to dialogue in academic tutoring?”. The method used in the process of constructing the scientific argumentation is problematization of issues, based on literature and the author’s experience gained during the “Masters of Didactics” project. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In order to answer the research question, first, tutoring was characterised as an exemplification of personalised education (learning), and then the author focused on the problematization of three dimensions of dialogue in academic tutoring. RESEARCH RESULTS: In the process of scientific analysis, three dimensions of dialogue were described (as a way of communication between the tutor and the tutee, a personal dialogue, and a motivational interviewing), showing the mosaic nature of dialogue in academic tutoring and the contribution of this process to the achievement of goals that complement one another. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS: In the mosaic approach to dialogue, each of its dimensions is important, and saturation of individual tutoring processes with them is conditioned by the factors corresponding to the personalization of education. Such an approach seems not only to legitimize and make varied tutoring practices more reflective, but it also inspires empirical research on the dimensions of dialogue at universities.
学术辅导中对话的镶嵌性
研究目的:本文的目的是对学术辅导中对话的维度提出问题并提出马赛克方法。研究问题与方法:本文所进行的思考旨在解决以下研究问题:“学术辅导对话的马赛克方法的结构和具体特征是什么?”在构建科学论证的过程中使用的方法是问题的问题化,基于文献和作者在“教学硕士”项目中获得的经验。论证过程:为了回答研究问题,首先,将辅导定性为个性化教育(学习)的例证,然后作者将重点放在学术辅导中对话的三个维度的问题化上。研究结果:在科学分析的过程中,描述了对话的三个维度(导师与学生之间的沟通方式,个人对话和动机访谈),显示了学术辅导中对话的马赛克性质以及这一过程对实现相辅相成的目标的贡献。结论、创新和建议:在对话的马赛克方法中,它的每个维度都很重要,个别辅导过程的饱和取决于与个性化教育相对应的因素。这种方法似乎不仅使各种辅导实践合法化,并使其更具反思性,而且还激发了对大学对话维度的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信