Arthroplasty after septic arthritis of the native hip and knee: retrospective analysis of 49 joints

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
E. Portier, V. Zeller, Y. Kerroumi, B. Heym, S. Marmor, P. Chazerain
{"title":"Arthroplasty after septic arthritis of the native hip and knee: retrospective analysis of 49 joints","authors":"E. Portier, V. Zeller, Y. Kerroumi, B. Heym, S. Marmor, P. Chazerain","doi":"10.5194/jbji-7-81-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Arthroplasty after septic arthritis (SA) treatment raises diagnostic and therapeutic questions. The main objective was to evaluate infection-free survival of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) post-SA. Other objectives were to describe the population's characteristics, surgical strategies, results of preoperative examinations and cultures of intraoperative samples taken at implantation, and postoperative antibiotic therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, monocenter study, from January 2005 to May 2019, including all patients undergoing TKA or THA with prior or ongoing SA in the same joint. Infection–free survival was analyzed and reported. Results: Forty-seven patients, 29 men, 49 joints operated on (30 knees, 19 hips), were included. Median SA-to-arthroplasty interval was 32 [1–216] weeks. It was <2 years for 43 joints and <6 months for 19 joints. Six patients underwent arthroplasty while still on SA treatment. One-stage arthroplasty was done for 43 joints and two-stage arthroplasty for 6 joints. Eight (16 %) cultures of intraoperative specimens were positive. Median durations of postoperative antibiotic therapy were 10 d for sterile cultures and 82 d for those that were positive. At 2 years, infection-free survival rate was 95.9 % ( ±0.02 ). After a median follow-up of 47 [18–142] months, no SA relapse was observed, but five patients developed new periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with a different microorganism. Conclusion: Arthroplasty may be a post-SA option, even within a short period of time. One-stage arthroplasty can be done if synovectomy is thorough, intraoperative samples are taken and antibiotics are administered until those culture results become available. We observed no SA relapse, but new PJIs occurred.","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"7 1","pages":"81 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-81-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Background: Arthroplasty after septic arthritis (SA) treatment raises diagnostic and therapeutic questions. The main objective was to evaluate infection-free survival of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) post-SA. Other objectives were to describe the population's characteristics, surgical strategies, results of preoperative examinations and cultures of intraoperative samples taken at implantation, and postoperative antibiotic therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, monocenter study, from January 2005 to May 2019, including all patients undergoing TKA or THA with prior or ongoing SA in the same joint. Infection–free survival was analyzed and reported. Results: Forty-seven patients, 29 men, 49 joints operated on (30 knees, 19 hips), were included. Median SA-to-arthroplasty interval was 32 [1–216] weeks. It was <2 years for 43 joints and <6 months for 19 joints. Six patients underwent arthroplasty while still on SA treatment. One-stage arthroplasty was done for 43 joints and two-stage arthroplasty for 6 joints. Eight (16 %) cultures of intraoperative specimens were positive. Median durations of postoperative antibiotic therapy were 10 d for sterile cultures and 82 d for those that were positive. At 2 years, infection-free survival rate was 95.9 % ( ±0.02 ). After a median follow-up of 47 [18–142] months, no SA relapse was observed, but five patients developed new periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with a different microorganism. Conclusion: Arthroplasty may be a post-SA option, even within a short period of time. One-stage arthroplasty can be done if synovectomy is thorough, intraoperative samples are taken and antibiotics are administered until those culture results become available. We observed no SA relapse, but new PJIs occurred.
49例髋关节、膝关节脓毒性关节炎后关节置换术的回顾性分析
背景:脓毒性关节炎(SA)治疗后的关节置换术提出了诊断和治疗问题。主要目的是评估sa后接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)或全髋关节置换术(THA)患者的无感染生存。其他目的是描述人群的特征,手术策略,术前检查和术中植入样本培养的结果,以及术后抗生素治疗。方法:这是一项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究,研究时间为2005年1月至2019年5月,包括所有在同一关节进行TKA或THA且既往或正在进行SA的患者。分析并报告无感染生存率。结果:47例患者,男性29例,手术关节49个(膝关节30个,髋关节19个)。sa至关节置换术的中位间隔为32周[1-216]。43个关节<2年,19个关节<6个月。6例患者在接受SA治疗的同时接受了关节置换术。一期关节置换43例,二期关节置换6例。术中标本培养阳性8例(16 %)。术后抗生素治疗的中位持续时间无菌培养为10 d,阳性培养为82 d。2年无感染生存率为95.9% %(±0.02)。中位随访47个月[18-142]后,未观察到SA复发,但有5例患者发生了新的假体周围关节感染(PJIs),感染微生物不同。结论:即使在短时间内,关节置换术也可能是sa后的一种选择。如果滑膜切除术彻底,可以进行一期关节置换术,术中采集样本并使用抗生素,直到获得培养结果。我们没有观察到SA复发,但出现了新的PJIs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信