Evaluation of cellular toxicity in Hep G2 cell and endothelial cells on different medical biopolymer supports

E. T. Fokunang, S. Barkwan, C. Fokunang, P. Tomkins
{"title":"Evaluation of cellular toxicity in Hep G2 cell and endothelial cells on different medical biopolymer supports","authors":"E. T. Fokunang, S. Barkwan, C. Fokunang, P. Tomkins","doi":"10.15406/MOJT.2018.04.00105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an application driven need to identify and develop new materials for the biomedical industry and improve their physical and biocompatible properties.1,2 A combination of cell and molecular biology strategies applied to the rapid evaluation of cell behaviour in contact with materials may help to meet this objective. A group of soft and hard polyurethanes were first evaluated on the basis of cyto-compatibility endpoints Neutral red, (NR, MTT and BrdU uptake) using liver (HepG2) and vascular (endothelial) cell lines.3‒5 By definition, biocompatibility is the ability of a material to perform with an appropriate host response on a specific application. The biocompatibility of biomaterials should be evaluated by quantitative methods. Only testing methods yielding quantitative results allow the biocompatibility “degree” of materials to be assessed and compared with that observed for different materials, including reference materials.6,7 Despite the relatively extensive nature of current test procedures, they are largely non-mechanistically driven and there are considerable opportunities to improve them. Since the late 1990s there has been considerable interest in applying gene expression methodology to the toxicology problem.8,9","PeriodicalId":92106,"journal":{"name":"MOJ toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/MOJT.2018.04.00105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an application driven need to identify and develop new materials for the biomedical industry and improve their physical and biocompatible properties.1,2 A combination of cell and molecular biology strategies applied to the rapid evaluation of cell behaviour in contact with materials may help to meet this objective. A group of soft and hard polyurethanes were first evaluated on the basis of cyto-compatibility endpoints Neutral red, (NR, MTT and BrdU uptake) using liver (HepG2) and vascular (endothelial) cell lines.3‒5 By definition, biocompatibility is the ability of a material to perform with an appropriate host response on a specific application. The biocompatibility of biomaterials should be evaluated by quantitative methods. Only testing methods yielding quantitative results allow the biocompatibility “degree” of materials to be assessed and compared with that observed for different materials, including reference materials.6,7 Despite the relatively extensive nature of current test procedures, they are largely non-mechanistically driven and there are considerable opportunities to improve them. Since the late 1990s there has been considerable interest in applying gene expression methodology to the toxicology problem.8,9
不同医用生物聚合物载体对Hep G2细胞和内皮细胞的细胞毒性评价
为生物医学工业识别和开发新材料并改善其物理和生物相容性是应用驱动的需求。1,2结合细胞和分子生物学策略,应用于快速评估细胞与材料接触的行为,可能有助于实现这一目标。首先使用肝(HepG2)和血管(内皮)细胞系,根据细胞相容性终点中性红(NR, MTT和BrdU摄取)对一组软硬聚氨酯进行评估。3-5根据定义,生物相容性是材料在特定应用中具有适当宿主反应的能力。生物材料的生物相容性应采用定量方法进行评价。只有产生定量结果的测试方法才能评估材料的生物相容性“程度”,并与不同材料(包括标准材料)的观察结果进行比较。6,7尽管目前的测试程序具有相对广泛的性质,但它们在很大程度上是非机械驱动的,并且有相当多的机会来改进它们。自20世纪90年代末以来,人们对将基因表达方法应用于毒理学问题产生了相当大的兴趣
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书