A Comparative Study of the Effect of Labetalol and Remifentanil on Pain Control After Bariatric Surgery.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-04 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.5812/aapm-138220
Masood Mohseni, Reza Farahmand Rad, Ali Akbar Jafarian, Mojtaba Rostami, Niloofar Khosravi
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Effect of Labetalol and Remifentanil on Pain Control After Bariatric Surgery.","authors":"Masood Mohseni, Reza Farahmand Rad, Ali Akbar Jafarian, Mojtaba Rostami, Niloofar Khosravi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-138220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finding the optimal combination of anesthetics to maintain hemodynamic stability during surgery can be challenging. Traditionally, strong opioid analgesics such as fentanyl and its newer analogs have been used. However, the use of narcotics is associated with certain side effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares the effects of labetalol and remifentanil in pain control after bariatric surgery in Hazrat Rasool Akram Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 48 laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients. The participants were randomly divided into two groups receiving remifentanil or labetalol. Postoperative pain was measured in the recovery unit using the numerical rating scale (NRS). This score was recorded upon entering recovery, and 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes after surgery for each patient. Also, the duration of anesthesia, the duration of the operation, the recovery time, the dose of the administered opioids, the volume of intravenous fluids, and the dose of administered propofol were recorded for each patient. Nausea and vomiting after the operation were also recorded as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the mean duration of surgery and anesthesia, dose of the administered anesthetics, recovery period, nausea and vomiting, and the dose of analgesics after the operation. The mean pain intensity during the given period and also the trend of pain intensity changes between the two groups demonstrated no statistically significant differences (P = 0.112). During the operation, 9 subjects (37.5%) in the labetalol group and 16 (66.7%) in the remifentanil group needed more analgesics (rescue drug); in this regard, a significant difference was observed between the two groups (P = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the study's findings, there were no significant differences between labetalol and remifentanil in post and perioperative pain control. However, rescue drugs needed to maintain hemodynamic stability during laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower in patients who received labetalol than remifentanil. Postoperative complications were also comparable between labetalol and remifentanil.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e138220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-138220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Finding the optimal combination of anesthetics to maintain hemodynamic stability during surgery can be challenging. Traditionally, strong opioid analgesics such as fentanyl and its newer analogs have been used. However, the use of narcotics is associated with certain side effects.

Objectives: This study compares the effects of labetalol and remifentanil in pain control after bariatric surgery in Hazrat Rasool Akram Hospital.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 48 laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients. The participants were randomly divided into two groups receiving remifentanil or labetalol. Postoperative pain was measured in the recovery unit using the numerical rating scale (NRS). This score was recorded upon entering recovery, and 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes after surgery for each patient. Also, the duration of anesthesia, the duration of the operation, the recovery time, the dose of the administered opioids, the volume of intravenous fluids, and the dose of administered propofol were recorded for each patient. Nausea and vomiting after the operation were also recorded as outcomes.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the mean duration of surgery and anesthesia, dose of the administered anesthetics, recovery period, nausea and vomiting, and the dose of analgesics after the operation. The mean pain intensity during the given period and also the trend of pain intensity changes between the two groups demonstrated no statistically significant differences (P = 0.112). During the operation, 9 subjects (37.5%) in the labetalol group and 16 (66.7%) in the remifentanil group needed more analgesics (rescue drug); in this regard, a significant difference was observed between the two groups (P = 0.043).

Conclusions: Based on the study's findings, there were no significant differences between labetalol and remifentanil in post and perioperative pain control. However, rescue drugs needed to maintain hemodynamic stability during laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower in patients who received labetalol than remifentanil. Postoperative complications were also comparable between labetalol and remifentanil.

拉贝洛尔与瑞芬太尼对减肥手术后疼痛控制作用的比较研究
背景:在手术中寻找维持血液动力学稳定的最佳麻醉剂组合可能具有挑战性。传统上,芬太尼及其新的类似物等强效阿片类止痛药已被使用。然而,使用麻醉品会产生某些副作用。目的:比较拉贝洛尔和瑞芬太尼在Hazrat Rasool Akram医院减肥手术后疼痛控制中的作用。方法:对48例腹腔镜减肥手术患者进行随机双盲临床试验。参与者被随机分为两组,接受瑞芬太尼或拉贝洛尔治疗。术后疼痛在康复室使用数字评定量表(NRS)进行测量。在每个患者进入康复期以及手术后30分钟、60分钟和120分钟记录该评分。此外,记录每位患者的麻醉持续时间、手术持续时间、恢复时间、阿片类药物的剂量、静脉输液量和丙泊酚的剂量。术后恶心和呕吐也被记录为结果。结果:两组在手术和麻醉的平均持续时间、所用麻醉剂的剂量、恢复期、恶心呕吐和术后镇痛剂的剂量方面没有显著差异。给药期间的平均疼痛强度和两组之间的疼痛强度变化趋势没有统计学上的显著差异(P=0.112)。在手术期间,拉贝洛尔组有9名受试者(37.5%)和瑞芬太尼组有16名(66.7%)需要更多的镇痛药(救援药);在这方面,两组之间观察到显著差异(P=0.043)。结论:根据研究结果,拉贝洛尔和瑞芬太尼在术后和围手术期疼痛控制方面没有显著差异。然而,腹腔镜手术中维持血液动力学稳定所需的抢救药物在接受拉贝洛尔的患者中明显低于瑞芬太尼。拉贝洛尔和瑞芬太尼的术后并发症也具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信