Assessing Provider Utilization of COVID-19 Inflammatory Marker Trends in Hospitalized Patients and Implications in Optimizing Value-Based Care During a Pandemic

P. Subramanian, Lucy Stun, Kellie Wark, N. Bahr, W. El Atrouni, L. Satterwhite, Maharshi Bhakta, F. Plapp, Jessica Newman
{"title":"Assessing Provider Utilization of COVID-19 Inflammatory Marker Trends in Hospitalized Patients and Implications in Optimizing Value-Based Care During a Pandemic","authors":"P. Subramanian, Lucy Stun, Kellie Wark, N. Bahr, W. El Atrouni, L. Satterwhite, Maharshi Bhakta, F. Plapp, Jessica Newman","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.15201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Numerous inflammatory markers may serve a role in prognostication of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Early in the pandemic, our health system created an admission order set which included daily d-dimer, c-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin. Given more available outcomes data, limiting standing order of labs that do not affect daily management could result in significant cost savings to the health system without adverse patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine ordering and utilization patterns of inflammatory markers by physicians caring for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Methods An anonymous 10-question survey was distributed to 125 physicians (Infectious Disease, Hospitalist, Pulmonary and Critical Care faculty). Responses were tallied and values greater than 50% were identified as the majority of the surveyed group. Results Of the 125 physicians surveyed, 77 (62%) responded. A total of 57.1% (44/77) of physicians reported ordering daily inflammatory markers for 3 – 10 days from admission. Another 31.2% (24/77) ordered markers until clinical improvement or hospital discharge. D-dimer was used for care decisions by 83.1% (64/77) of respondents; 93.8% (60/64) of those reported utilizing it in determining anticoagulation dose. CRP was used by 61% (47/77) of physicians to help identify a secondary infection or determine steroid dose or duration. LDH and ferritin were not used for management decisions by the majority of physicians. Inflammatory markers were not used routinely after isolation precautions had been discontinued, even when ongoing care required mechanical ventilation. Conclusions Of the markers studied, both d-dimer and CRP were considered useful by most respondents. LDH and ferritin were used less frequently and were not considered as useful in guiding medical decision making. Discontinuation of standing daily LDH and ferritin orders is believed to have potential to result in cost savings to the health care system with no adverse patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"91 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.15201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Numerous inflammatory markers may serve a role in prognostication of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Early in the pandemic, our health system created an admission order set which included daily d-dimer, c-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin. Given more available outcomes data, limiting standing order of labs that do not affect daily management could result in significant cost savings to the health system without adverse patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine ordering and utilization patterns of inflammatory markers by physicians caring for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Methods An anonymous 10-question survey was distributed to 125 physicians (Infectious Disease, Hospitalist, Pulmonary and Critical Care faculty). Responses were tallied and values greater than 50% were identified as the majority of the surveyed group. Results Of the 125 physicians surveyed, 77 (62%) responded. A total of 57.1% (44/77) of physicians reported ordering daily inflammatory markers for 3 – 10 days from admission. Another 31.2% (24/77) ordered markers until clinical improvement or hospital discharge. D-dimer was used for care decisions by 83.1% (64/77) of respondents; 93.8% (60/64) of those reported utilizing it in determining anticoagulation dose. CRP was used by 61% (47/77) of physicians to help identify a secondary infection or determine steroid dose or duration. LDH and ferritin were not used for management decisions by the majority of physicians. Inflammatory markers were not used routinely after isolation precautions had been discontinued, even when ongoing care required mechanical ventilation. Conclusions Of the markers studied, both d-dimer and CRP were considered useful by most respondents. LDH and ferritin were used less frequently and were not considered as useful in guiding medical decision making. Discontinuation of standing daily LDH and ferritin orders is believed to have potential to result in cost savings to the health care system with no adverse patient outcomes.
评估住院患者新冠肺炎炎症标志物趋势的提供者利用率以及在大流行期间优化基于价值的护理的意义
引言许多炎症标志物可能在新冠肺炎感染住院患者的预后中发挥作用。在疫情早期,我们的卫生系统创建了一个入院顺序集,其中包括每日d-二聚体、c-反应蛋白(CRP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和铁蛋白。如果有更多可用的结果数据,在不影响日常管理的情况下,限制实验室的常备秩序可能会为卫生系统节省大量成本,而不会产生不良的患者结果。本研究的目的是确定新冠肺炎感染住院患者的医生对炎症标志物的排序和使用模式。方法对125名医生(传染病科、住院医师、肺科和重症监护科)进行10个问题的匿名调查。对回答进行了统计,超过50%的数值被确定为受调查组的大多数。结果在接受调查的125名医生中,有77名(62%)做出了回应。共有57.1%(44/77)的医生报告称,在入院后的3-10天内,每天都会订购炎症标志物。另有31.2%(24/77)的患者在临床好转或出院前订购了标记物。83.1%(64/77)的受访者将D-二聚体用于护理决策;93.8%(60/64)的报告使用它来确定抗凝剂量。61%(47/77)的医生使用CRP来帮助识别继发感染或确定类固醇剂量或持续时间。大多数医生未将LDH和铁蛋白用于管理决策。在隔离预防措施停止后,即使在持续护理需要机械通气的情况下,也没有常规使用炎症标志物。结论在研究的标志物中,大多数受访者认为d-二聚体和CRP都是有用的。LDH和铁蛋白的使用频率较低,也不被认为对指导医疗决策有用。停止每天的LDH和铁蛋白医嘱被认为有可能为医疗保健系统节省成本,而不会对患者产生不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信