The Power Dynamics and Stakeholder Effects in the Legislative Process of Philanthropy Lawmaking in China

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Talia Ye Tao, Cynthia R. Jasper
{"title":"The Power Dynamics and Stakeholder Effects in the Legislative Process of Philanthropy Lawmaking in China","authors":"Talia Ye Tao, Cynthia R. Jasper","doi":"10.1353/chn.2022.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:How did the engagement of various stakeholders affect the legislative process resulting in the Charity Law of the People's Republic of China? This article employs methods of participant observation, expert consultation and qualitative document analysis to find an answer. Results indicate that the power distribution in the legislative process was neither uniform nor one-directional. Power was distributed among a limited scope of stakeholders, then largely to all stakeholders and finally only to the legislative committee of the National People's Congress (NPC). The NPC committees had a significant impact on the philanthropy legislation; while seemingly marginal stakeholders, such as prominent academics, actually wielded more power through specialities and political connections than those institutions with traditional authority, such as the Ministry of Civil Affairs. Throughout the legislative process, various stakeholders have exerted effects on the representation of legal contexts (e.g. the chapter on charitable trusts) and the regulation of specific affairs (e.g. online fundraising). This study provides crucial insights into the power dynamics and stakeholder effect in the philanthropy legislative processes in China and explores the nuances inherent in the transformation of philanthropy in Chinese civil society.","PeriodicalId":45391,"journal":{"name":"China-An International Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"121 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2022.0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:How did the engagement of various stakeholders affect the legislative process resulting in the Charity Law of the People's Republic of China? This article employs methods of participant observation, expert consultation and qualitative document analysis to find an answer. Results indicate that the power distribution in the legislative process was neither uniform nor one-directional. Power was distributed among a limited scope of stakeholders, then largely to all stakeholders and finally only to the legislative committee of the National People's Congress (NPC). The NPC committees had a significant impact on the philanthropy legislation; while seemingly marginal stakeholders, such as prominent academics, actually wielded more power through specialities and political connections than those institutions with traditional authority, such as the Ministry of Civil Affairs. Throughout the legislative process, various stakeholders have exerted effects on the representation of legal contexts (e.g. the chapter on charitable trusts) and the regulation of specific affairs (e.g. online fundraising). This study provides crucial insights into the power dynamics and stakeholder effect in the philanthropy legislative processes in China and explores the nuances inherent in the transformation of philanthropy in Chinese civil society.
我国慈善立法过程中的权力动态与利益相关者效应
摘要:各利益相关方的参与如何影响《中华人民共和国慈善法》的立法进程?本文采用了参与观察、专家咨询和定性文献分析等方法来寻找答案。结果表明,立法过程中的权力分配既不均匀,也不单向。权力被分配给有限范围的利益相关者,然后主要分配给所有利益相关者,最后只分配给全国人民代表大会立法委员会。全国人大常委会对慈善事业立法的影响较大;而看似边缘的利益相关者,如著名学者,实际上通过专业和政治关系,比那些拥有传统权威的机构,如民政部,拥有更大的权力。在整个立法过程中,不同的利益相关者对法律背景的代表性(例如慈善信托章节)和具体事务的监管(例如网上筹款)产生了影响。本研究对中国慈善立法过程中的权力动态和利益相关者效应提供了重要的见解,并探讨了中国公民社会慈善转型中固有的细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信