A novel integrated framework for reproducible formability predictions using virtual materials testing

Adam Plowman, P. Jedrasiak, T. Jailin, Peter Crowther, Sumeet R. Mishra, P. Shanthraj, J. Quinta da Fonseca
{"title":"A novel integrated framework for reproducible formability predictions using virtual materials testing","authors":"Adam Plowman, P. Jedrasiak, T. Jailin, Peter Crowther, Sumeet R. Mishra, P. Shanthraj, J. Quinta da Fonseca","doi":"10.12688/materialsopenres.17516.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Formed aluminium alloy sheet materials are increasingly adopted in production processes such as vehicle manufacturing, due to the potential for weight-saving and improved recyclability when compared to more traditional steel alloys. To maximise these benefits whilst maintaining sufficient mechanical properties, the link between formability and microstructure must be better understood. Virtual materials testing is a cost-effective strategy for generating microstructure-informed formability predictions. Methods: We developed an open-source hybrid framework, combining experimental and computational tasks, for generating reproducible formability predictions. Starting with experimental texture measurements and stress-strain curves, we calibrated crystal plasticity (CP) model parameters. The framework used these parameters to perform a large set of multiaxial full-field CP simulations, from which various anisotropic yield functions were fitted. With these anisotropy parameters, we then employed a Marciniak-Kuczynski finite-element model to predict forming limit curves, which we compared with those from experimental Nakazima tests. Results: We executed the workflow with the aluminium alloy Surfalex HF (AA6016A) as a case study material. The 18-parameter Barlat yield function provided the best fit, compared to six-parameter functions. Predicted forming limits depended strongly on the chosen hardening law, and good agreement with the experimental forming limit curve was found. All of the generated data have been uploaded to the Zenodo repository. A set of Jupyter notebooks to allow interactive inspection of our methods and data are also available. Conclusions: We demonstrated a robust methodology for replicable virtual materials testing, which enables cheaper and faster formability analyses. This complete workflow is encoded within a simple yet highly customisable computational pipeline that can be applied to any material. To maximise reproducibility, our approach takes care to ensure our methods and data — and the ways in which that data is processed — are unambiguously defined during all steps of the workflow.","PeriodicalId":29806,"journal":{"name":"Materials Open Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/materialsopenres.17516.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Formed aluminium alloy sheet materials are increasingly adopted in production processes such as vehicle manufacturing, due to the potential for weight-saving and improved recyclability when compared to more traditional steel alloys. To maximise these benefits whilst maintaining sufficient mechanical properties, the link between formability and microstructure must be better understood. Virtual materials testing is a cost-effective strategy for generating microstructure-informed formability predictions. Methods: We developed an open-source hybrid framework, combining experimental and computational tasks, for generating reproducible formability predictions. Starting with experimental texture measurements and stress-strain curves, we calibrated crystal plasticity (CP) model parameters. The framework used these parameters to perform a large set of multiaxial full-field CP simulations, from which various anisotropic yield functions were fitted. With these anisotropy parameters, we then employed a Marciniak-Kuczynski finite-element model to predict forming limit curves, which we compared with those from experimental Nakazima tests. Results: We executed the workflow with the aluminium alloy Surfalex HF (AA6016A) as a case study material. The 18-parameter Barlat yield function provided the best fit, compared to six-parameter functions. Predicted forming limits depended strongly on the chosen hardening law, and good agreement with the experimental forming limit curve was found. All of the generated data have been uploaded to the Zenodo repository. A set of Jupyter notebooks to allow interactive inspection of our methods and data are also available. Conclusions: We demonstrated a robust methodology for replicable virtual materials testing, which enables cheaper and faster formability analyses. This complete workflow is encoded within a simple yet highly customisable computational pipeline that can be applied to any material. To maximise reproducibility, our approach takes care to ensure our methods and data — and the ways in which that data is processed — are unambiguously defined during all steps of the workflow.
使用虚拟材料测试可重复成形性预测的新型集成框架
背景:与更传统的钢合金相比,成型铝合金板材具有减轻重量和提高可回收性的潜力,因此越来越多地被用于汽车制造等生产过程。为了在保持足够的机械性能的同时最大限度地提高这些优势,必须更好地理解可成形性和微观结构之间的联系。虚拟材料测试是一种成本效益高的策略,用于生成基于微观结构的成形性预测。方法:我们开发了一个开源的混合框架,结合实验和计算任务,用于生成可重复的成形性预测。从实验织构测量和应力-应变曲线开始,我们校准了晶体塑性(CP)模型参数。该框架使用这些参数进行了一大组多轴全场CP模拟,从中拟合了各种各向异性屈服函数。利用这些各向异性参数,我们使用Marciniak Kuczynski有限元模型来预测成形极限曲线,并将其与实验Nakazima试验的结果进行了比较。结果:我们使用铝合金SurflexHF(AA6016A)作为案例研究材料执行了工作流程。与六个参数函数相比,18个参数的Barlat屈服函数提供了最佳拟合。预测的成形极限很大程度上取决于所选择的硬化规律,并且与实验成形极限曲线吻合良好。所有生成的数据都已上传到Zenodo存储库。还提供了一套Jupyter笔记本,可以对我们的方法和数据进行交互式检查。结论:我们展示了一种用于可复制虚拟材料测试的稳健方法,该方法能够进行更便宜、更快的成形性分析。这个完整的工作流程编码在一个简单但高度可定制的计算管道中,可以应用于任何材料。为了最大限度地提高再现性,我们的方法注意确保我们的方法和数据——以及处理数据的方式——在工作流程的所有步骤中都得到了明确的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials Open Research
Materials Open Research materials science-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Materials Open Research is a rapid open access publishing platform for a broad range of materials science research. The platform welcomes theoretical, experimental, and modelling approaches on the properties, characterization, design, structure, classification, processing, and performance of materials, and their applications. The platform is open to submissions from researchers, practitioners and experts, and all articles will benefit from open peer review.  Materials research underpins many significant and novel technologies which are set to revolutionize our society, and Materials Open Research is well-suited to ensure fast and full access to this research for the benefit of the academic community, industry, and beyond. The platform aims to create a forum for discussion and for the dissemination of research in all areas of materials science and engineering. This includes, but is not limited to, research on the following material classes: ● Biomaterials and biomedical materials ● Composites ● Economic minerals ● Electronic materials ● Glasses & ceramics ● Magnetic materials ● Metals & alloys ● Nanomaterials and nanostructures ● Polymers ● Porous materials ● Quantum materials ● Smart materials ● Soft matter ● Structural materials ● Superconducting materials ● Thin films Materials Open Research also focuses on a range of applications and approaches within materials science, including but not limited to: ● Additive manufacturing ● Computational materials & modelling ● Materials in energy & the environment ● Materials informatics ● Materials synthesis and processing In addition to original Research Articles, Materials Open Research will feature a variety of article types including Method Articles, Study Protocols, Software Tool Articles, Systematic Reviews, Data Notes, Brief Reports, and Opinion Articles. All research is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we accept confirmatory and replication studies, as well as negative and null results.  Materials Open Research is an Open Research Platform. All articles are published open access under a CC-BY license and authors benefit from fully transparent publishing and peer review processes. Where applicable, authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and will receive editorial guidance on making all underlying data openly available in order to improve reproducibility. The platform will also provide the option to publish non-peer reviewed materials including technical reports, training materials, posters, slides, and other documents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信