Ariella Aïsha Azoulay and Georges Didi-Huberman: the persistence of lost worlds

IF 0.4 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Stijn De Cauwer
{"title":"Ariella Aïsha Azoulay and Georges Didi-Huberman: the persistence of lost worlds","authors":"Stijn De Cauwer","doi":"10.1080/20004214.2021.1994179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In two striking books released in 2019, Ariella Aïsha Azoulay and Georges Didi-Huberman explicitly draw a connection between their respective theoretical approaches to images and their family histories. In Potential History: Unlearning Imperialism, Azoulay recounts the suppression of the existence of her Algerian-Jewish grandmother Aïsha by her father, who wanted to hide his Arabic-Algerian origins. Azoulay consequently develops a critical view on the history of photography and its role in the imperialist destruction of entire lifeworlds. In Pour Commencer Encore, Didi-Huberman recounts the story of his mother, who had to hide her Jewishness to survive the Nazi occupation of France, and of his father, who migrated to France as a Jewish Tunisian. In both cases, their relatives’ cultural identity had to remain invisible for various reasons in the countries in which their children grew up. Azoulay and Didi-Huberman present their approaches to images as influenced by the injustices experienced by these relatives and their commitment to them even goes as far as both them of changing their author names: Azoulay added “Aïsha” to her name and Didi-Huberman adopted his paternal (“Didi”) and maternal (“Huberman”) family name. However, this commitment led them to develop vastly different approaches to images and photographs. Whereas Azoulay emphasizes the role of photography in the imperialist destruction of worlds, remaining cautious of even reproducing certain photographs in her book, Didi-Huberman argues that worlds are never completely lost and that traces of these worlds always reappear by means of images. Azoulay aligns photography with imperialism and colonialism, while Didi-Huberman associates photography with migration. In their desire to do justice to the sufferings of their relatives, both influential theorists of images develop strongly diverging views on the politics of photographs and how they can reveal traces of lost worlds.","PeriodicalId":43229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aesthetics & Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aesthetics & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2021.1994179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In two striking books released in 2019, Ariella Aïsha Azoulay and Georges Didi-Huberman explicitly draw a connection between their respective theoretical approaches to images and their family histories. In Potential History: Unlearning Imperialism, Azoulay recounts the suppression of the existence of her Algerian-Jewish grandmother Aïsha by her father, who wanted to hide his Arabic-Algerian origins. Azoulay consequently develops a critical view on the history of photography and its role in the imperialist destruction of entire lifeworlds. In Pour Commencer Encore, Didi-Huberman recounts the story of his mother, who had to hide her Jewishness to survive the Nazi occupation of France, and of his father, who migrated to France as a Jewish Tunisian. In both cases, their relatives’ cultural identity had to remain invisible for various reasons in the countries in which their children grew up. Azoulay and Didi-Huberman present their approaches to images as influenced by the injustices experienced by these relatives and their commitment to them even goes as far as both them of changing their author names: Azoulay added “Aïsha” to her name and Didi-Huberman adopted his paternal (“Didi”) and maternal (“Huberman”) family name. However, this commitment led them to develop vastly different approaches to images and photographs. Whereas Azoulay emphasizes the role of photography in the imperialist destruction of worlds, remaining cautious of even reproducing certain photographs in her book, Didi-Huberman argues that worlds are never completely lost and that traces of these worlds always reappear by means of images. Azoulay aligns photography with imperialism and colonialism, while Didi-Huberman associates photography with migration. In their desire to do justice to the sufferings of their relatives, both influential theorists of images develop strongly diverging views on the politics of photographs and how they can reveal traces of lost worlds.
Ariella Aïsha Azoulay和Georges Didi Huberman:失落世界的持久性
摘要在2019年出版的两本引人注目的书中,Ariella Aïsha Azoulay和Georges Didi Huberman明确地将他们各自的图像理论方法与家族史联系起来。在《潜在的历史:解放帝国主义》一书中,阿祖莱讲述了她的阿尔及利亚犹太祖母艾莎被她的父亲压制的故事,她的父亲想隐瞒他的阿拉伯-阿尔及利亚血统。因此,阿祖莱对摄影史及其在帝国主义摧毁整个生命世界中的作用提出了批判的观点。在《Pour Commencer Encore》中,Didi Huberman讲述了他的母亲和父亲的故事,母亲为了在纳粹占领法国期间幸存下来,不得不隐藏自己的犹太身份,父亲作为一名犹太突尼斯人移民到法国。在这两种情况下,由于各种原因,他们亲属的文化身份在其子女成长的国家不得不保持隐形。Azoulay和Didi Huberman表示,他们对图像的处理方式受到了这些亲属所经历的不公正的影响,他们对这些亲属的承诺甚至包括他们都更改了作者的名字:Azoulay在她的名字后面加了“Aïsha”,Didi Hubterman采用了他的父系(“Didi”)和母系(“Huberman”)姓氏。然而,这一承诺使他们开发了截然不同的图像和照片方法。尽管阿祖莱强调摄影在帝国主义摧毁世界中的作用,甚至在她的书中对复制某些照片保持谨慎,但迪迪·胡伯曼认为,世界从未完全消失,这些世界的痕迹总是通过图像再现。阿祖莱将摄影与帝国主义和殖民主义联系在一起,而迪迪·胡伯曼则将摄影与移民联系在一起。为了公正对待亲人的痛苦,两位有影响力的图像理论家都对照片的政治性以及如何揭示失落世界的痕迹产生了强烈的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信